Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 39 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,578–21,653 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 04:20
21,587
-8
13 Sept 2026, 16:36
21,595
-1
11 Sept 2026, 18:17
21,596
+9
9 Sept 2026, 04:16
21,587
-23
5 Sept 2026, 19:59
21,610
+1
3 Sept 2026, 15:37
21,609
-4
2 Sept 2026, 11:33
21,613
-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:38
21,614
+1
31 Aug 2026, 08:57
21,613
+2
30 Aug 2026, 11:34
21,611
-4
29 Aug 2026, 11:36
21,615
-6
27 Aug 2026, 12:04
21,621
-5
26 Aug 2026, 12:11
21,626
+4
25 Aug 2026, 13:02
21,622
-3
24 Aug 2026, 12:49
21,625
+3
22 Aug 2026, 18:36
21,622
-8
21 Aug 2026, 08:36
21,630
-5
20 Aug 2026, 10:43
21,635
-8
19 Aug 2026, 12:37
21,643
-1
18 Aug 2026, 11:43
21,644
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 21,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,210
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
56 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
108,220
Reactions total
2,006
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 32s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,956 reactions across 56 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
2,680
33.7%
❤
1,942
24.4%
👍
1,282
16.1%
🗿
566
7.11%
💔
548
6.89%
😐
346
4.35%
🔥
301
3.78%
😭
127
1.60%
👏
81
1.02%
🤪
69
0.867%
🫡
10
0.126%
🥰
3
0.038%
💅
1
0.013%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,956 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 56 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OfficialCinemaTwitter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
همیشه معتقد بودم بهترین فیلم ترسناک اون فیلمیه که یه بلایی سرت بیاره که بعدش دیگه جرئت نکنی دوباره ببینیش. این فیلم دقیقاً یکی از همونهاست.
داستانش دربارهی مستندسازیه که روی اتفاقات و پدیدههای ماورایی تحقیق میکنه.
Noroi the curse 2005
* Pawn *
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
اینکه بتونی ژولیت بینوش رو بیاری ایران بهش آبگوشت بدی اونم کف خیابون رو میز و صندلی پلاستیکی و همزمان نیکی کریمی هم تو آبنمک گذاشتی خیس بخوره عباس تو کی بودی عبااس تو چی بودی
* better not call arash *
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
فیلمنامهی «سونات پاییزی» را ظرف چند هفته نوشتم تا اگر فیلمم «تخم مار» با کله زمین خورد، چیزی در آستین داشته باشم. اینگرید شیوهی کار عجیب و منحصربهفردی داشت. اوایل دورهی تمرین متوجه شدم که همدلی کردن و با حوصله به حرفهایش گوش دادن جواب نمیدهد. در مورد او مجبور شدم از شیوههایی استفاده کنم که معمولاً خودم ردشان میکردم؛ و در درجهی اول، پرخاشگری. یک بار به من گفت: «اگر به من نگویی این صحنه را چطور باید بازی کنم،…
دیگه وقتشه کینگرام و تتلو و نامجو توی کافهی بابک زنجانی اجرای زنده داشته باشن و به مهمونا بلیط تئاتر پژمان جمشیدی و فرهاد اصلانی به نویسندگی آیدین آغداشلو رو هدیه بدن.
* im_totor0 *
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
سخنرانی احساسی کوین اسپیسی پس از کسب جایزه اسکار بهترین بازیگر نقش مکمل مرد در سال ۱۹۹۶ برای بازی در فیلم مظنونین همیشگی
* cinema bestt *
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
تخمی ترين و رو مخ ترين حركتی كه تو اينستا ديدم ميكس اهنگای كسشر و خز اينستايی رو سيگار كشيدن شلبی و رفقاش بود. اين حركت به قدری تخمی بود كه ديگه بعد اون هيچوقت سمت پيكی بلايندرز نرفتم.
* سالازار *
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
استودیو بهمعنای واقعی کلمه به دستوپای فینچر و برد پیت افتاد که پایانبندی Se7en را تغییر دهند و از بیرحمی آن بکاهند. اما آن دو هیچجوره زیر بار نرفتند که آن جعبهی کذایی از پایانبندی حذف شود. نتیجه؟ یکی از تکاندهندهترین پایانبندیهای تاریخ سینما و عامل اصلی جاودانگی فیلم.
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
"من اصفهان را بهعنوان شهری زیبا به یاد داشتم و امیدوار بودم بتوانم از تمام شهر استفاده کنم. اما وقتی این بار برای بازدید از لوکیشنها به آنجا رفتم، بولدوزرهایی دیدم که آخرین خانهها را خراب میکردند و جرثقیلهایی که روی ویرانهها، شهری مدرن و معمولی برپا میکردند. خوشبختانه هنوز چند مجموعه، بنا و معبد زیبا باقی ماندهاند." پازولینی
* CinemaJabe *
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
شما در حال تماشای یکی از نمادترین لحظات تاریخ سینمای جهان هستید.
جین کلی با تب 39 درجه، زیر باران، ترانه Singin' in the rain را میخواند و رقصی زیبا و سرخوشانه میکند. بارانی که حتی باران هم نبود؛ بخاطر اینکه جلوه بهتری در برابر دوربین داشته باشد، ترکیب شیر و آب بود. میگویند چنان لباس جین کلی از شیر سنگین شده بود که توانایی حرکت سخت و طاقتفرسا بود. ۶ روز پیدرپی تیم تولید در حال خشککردن صحنه و ضبط دوباره بودند و …
سرنوشت قومی که هنگام بلا و سختی به خرافهپرستی و "دعا" روی میآورد، چیزی جز نابودی نیست.
The Seventh Seal - Ingmar Bergman
* mental *
@OfficialCinemaTwitter
❤89👍36😐6🔥3🗿3
Signed Aria
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @OfficialCinemaTwitter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دیالوگ های ماندگار @tinymoviez · 124,350 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
نشریه دیجیتالی سینما🛰 @CooFilm · 42,506 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
MovieTwitte | مووی توییت @MovieTwitte · 46,461 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
HIGH MOVIES @high_moviess · 52,885 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
Cinema Tweet @cinema_twittt · 28,812 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
سینما توییتر فارسی ⚫⚫ @Cinema_Twitter_Farsi · 66,406 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
کافه هنر @honar7modiran · 35,118 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
Cinema | سینما دارک @CinemaDL_ir · 53,972 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
🎥 CinemaFact 📺 @MyCinemaFact2 · 285,877 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
Cinematicket - سینماتیکت @cinematicketorg · 25,893 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 September 2026
CinemaDaily | سینمادیلی @Cinemadaily · 59,874 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
مووی کاتیج @CottageOrg · 801,368 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
آنها @anhaaparat · 65,455 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
رئالیسم @reaalissm · 25,938 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
30nama @OfficialCinama · 57,519 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
PDF | پی دی اف @PDFsCom · 304,372 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
BOOK™ @lBOOKl · 188,431 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سینما توییتر” (@OfficialCinemaTwitter), 21,587 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficialCinemaTwitter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.