Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فوت توییت ⚽️

Channel

فوت توییت ⚽️

@Foot_twitte

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,092subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001058109955
TypeChannel
Username@Foot_twitte
Descriptionآخرین توییت‌های فوتبالی & ورزشی رو از فوت توییت دنبال کنید! @FootFun2020 @footfuntv2024 سرویس پخش زنده فوتفان 👇 تبلیغات @fftabligh 👈 نحوه‌ی ارسال توییت: فقط در توییتر با هشتگ #فوتفان و #فوت_توییت 👉 بازنشر توییت به معنای تاییدش نیست.
Created3 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Foot_twitte

Growth

27,09227,17827,1355 August 2026 — 27,178 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,178 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,177 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,160 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,158 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,156 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,151 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,147 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,148 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,139 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,130 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,118 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,114 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,106 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,096 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,092 subscribers5 August 202622 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,079–27,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 00:4627,092-4
20 Aug 2026, 18:4627,096-10
19 Aug 2026, 18:3327,106-8
18 Aug 2026, 19:0427,114-4
17 Aug 2026, 22:0527,118-12
16 Aug 2026, 20:5327,130-9
14 Aug 2026, 03:2427,139-9
12 Aug 2026, 20:1327,148+1
11 Aug 2026, 20:5227,147-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:3227,151-5
10 Aug 2026, 02:2227,156-2
9 Aug 2026, 03:5127,158-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:5527,160-7
7 Aug 2026, 07:3727,167-10
6 Aug 2026, 08:3027,177-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:0127,178no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0027,178first reading

Engagement

135 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 27,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,140
135 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
135
of 135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held135 (3 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total963,480
Reactions total19,429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
42,100
Videos
6,190
Links
1,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23m 14s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18,869 reactions across 130 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣5,55429.4%
3,98621.1%
👍3,57018.9%
😁2,04310.8%
🔥1,3166.97%
💔1,1626.16%
👎1,1135.90%
😍960.509%
👌150.079%
🤩140.074%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 135 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Foot_twitte. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 135 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,930 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026

یه نکته در مورد اینکه چرا چندین ساله سوپرجام فوتبال آلمان تو ورزشگاه بایرن‌مونیخ برگزار نمیشه: طبق قانونی که از سال ۲۰۱۰ گذاشتن بازی سوپرجام به میزبانی قهرمان جام حذفی برگزار میشه و این چند سال بایرن‌مونیخ همش قهرمان لیگ شده... و نکته دیگه اینه که اگه یه تیم هم دوگانه ببره بازهم سوپرجام تو خونه‌ی نایب قهرمان لیگ برگزار میشه... این یعنی حالا حالاها خبری از سوپرجام آلمان تو آلیانز آرنا نیست... «محمد پارسا رحمانی» @f

19🤣18👍1👎1

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈2,030 views57 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

۳۰۰ میلیون پوند هزینه در تابستان شکست ۲-۰ تاتنهام مقابل برنتفورد در نیمه اول. «⚽️تا خرتناق فوتبالی⚽️» @foot_twitte

🤣57

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈2,090 views53 reactionsread 22 August 2026

دوستان میگن انتظار این بازی از منچستر نداشتن چرا نداشتید؟ ته ته این سبک فوتبال با اوله دیدیم باور کنید اون تیم اوله بهترین تیم دنیا تو این سبک بود ولی قهرمان نشد با این مدیریت و مربی و سبک بازی همیشه با مالکیت کمتر میبریم و با مالکیت بیشتر میبازیم :)) «چیچاریتو» @foot_twitte

👍48🤣5

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,140 views102 reactionsread 22 August 2026

لذت ناکامی همه تیمای انگلیسی عادی میشه بالاخره، جز منچستر. «Mahmoud» @foot_twitte

🤣82👎11💔53😁1

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈3,720 views81 reactionsread 22 August 2026

چندتا فکت در مورد مربی بوسنیایی هال سیتی بگم: اولین سرمربی بوسنیایی تاریخ لیگ برتره و تنها سرمربی بوسنیایی تاریخ لیگ برتره که تیمش موفق میشه یه بازی پرمیرلیگ رو ببره... و اینا همه مقابل منچستریونایتد واسش رقم خورد... «محمد پارسا رحمانی» @foot_twitte

51😁14🔥8👍5💔3

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈4,010 views119 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

باز شروع شد، باز شروع شد، باااااز شروع شد کریک دلقکککک، گفته بود اطمینان میدم این فصل مالکانه بازی کنیم و اینم نتیجه اولین "بازی مالکانه" منچستر مقابل تیم تازه صعود کرده… دو گل خوردیم، جا داشت دو تا دیگه هم بخوریم! قبلاً هم گفته بودم؛ با برونو نمیشه بازی مالکانه اجرا کرد. «لِد تَسو» @foot_twitte

👍66🤣40👎94

Signed Hadi Farahani

22 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈3,880 views144 reactionsread 22 August 2026

با پیوستن طارمی به الوصل الان بالاترین سطحی که لژیونر های ایرانی بازی میکنن لیگ لهستان و هلنده سراشیبی سطح فوتبالمون تازه شروع شده «محمد مهدی فرهادی» @foot_twitte

👍112🤣27💔31🔥1

Signed Hadi Farahani

22 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈4,060 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔥 فروش هات ووچر با بهترین قیمت 🔥 هات ووچر مورد نیازت رو سریع و مطمئن تهیه کن! ✅ تحویل سریع ✅ قیمت مناسب و رقابتی ✅ پشتیبانی و پاسخگویی ✅ مناسب برای استفاده و فعال‌سازی سرویس‌های مربوطه 📩 برای استعلام قیمت و ثبت سفارش، همین الان پیام بده. @K77ian https://t.me/hotvoucher_ir

2🤣1

Signed footfuniran Ads

22 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈4,820 views127 reactionsread 22 August 2026

تیمی که دفاع راستش مزروعی و دفاع وسطش هیونه به گل خوردن تو همون دقایق اول مقابل تیم تازه صعود کرده لیگ نباید بگه تقدیر... باید بگه حماقت مدیریت باشگاه... «محمد پارسا رحمانی» @foot_twitte

👍103😁186

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈5,420 views100 reactionsread 22 August 2026

نه ببین ما بازیکنا رو از حریف می‌گیریم و کاپیتانش می‌کنیم که نحسیمون بگیرتش. اگر نگرفت و امتیاز گرفت هم یه کمی کمتر ناراحت می‌شیم :))) «بی‌نا» @foot_twitte

🤣93👍3👎21😁1

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈5,710 views134 reactionsread 22 August 2026

فکر کن مثلا منچستر با ایپسویچ بازی داره و توئم از ایپسویچ دفاع وسط داری دلت میخواد منچستر ببره ولی ایپسویچ هم گل بخوره کلین شیت دفاع وسطت به چوخ میره هم نمیتونی از بازی تیمت لذت ببری هم استرس گند زدن بازیکن فانتزیتو داری «Dante» @foot_twitte

👍112🤣20👎2

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

22 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈5,730 views117 reactionsread 22 August 2026

ما رو نحسیمون حساب میکنیم از حریف بازیکن میاریم «لاشیِ توییتر🇧🇷» @foot_twitte

🤣114👎2👍1

Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅

Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @Foot_twitte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTCAnonymous Poll3,090 voters approx.

قهرمان این فصل لیگ برتر انگلیس؟

  1. آرسنال52%
  2. منچسترسیتی3%
  3. لیورپول9%
  4. منچستریونایتد18%
  5. چلسی11%
  6. تاتنهام3%
  7. استون‌ویلا2%
  8. نیوکاسل1%
  9. سایر تیم‌ها1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 284,558 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FootFun | فوتفان
@FootFun2020 · 83,650
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
ترول فوتبال
@trollfootball_persian · 65,194
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
طرفداری
@tarafdari · 103,312
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
⚽️Dashagh News⚽️
@Dashaghnews · 112,429
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Radio Relax
@RadiioRelax · 132,140
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
SUT Twitter
@sut_tw · 89,634
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
توییتر فارسی
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,251
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
ابوطالب حسینی
@abutalebhosseini · 98,834
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
Fweeter
@Fweeter · 64,270
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
BOOK™
@OfficialBook · 77,087
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
سينمادیلی | CinemaDaily
@Cinemadaily · 63,767
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
گزارش‌ورزشی
@Gsport3 · 84,828
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
سینما توییتر فارسی ⚫⚫
@Cinema_Twitter_Farsi · 66,420
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
فوتبال ۳۶۰
@ft360_ir · 433,349
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist
@Playlistpodcas · 152,612
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
دیالوگ های ماندگار
@tinymoviez · 124,796
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
اخبار مهم
@Saate_13 · 60,219
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
کاف
@kafiha · 692,411
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
تـاج | اسـتقـلال
@Esteghlal · 102,192
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
حافظه تاریخی
@hafezeye_tarikhi · 139,896
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
مملکته
@mamlekate · 569,758
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین
@vahidonline · 1,412,490
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Virauniversity | ویرا
@virauniversitycom · 380,301
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
VahidOOnline وحید اون‌لاین
@VahidOOnLine · 77,744
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فوت توییت ⚽️” (@Foot_twitte), 27,092 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Foot_twitte.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.