Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net +125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,475–8,638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 09:57
8,619
+1
1 Sept 2026, 05:14
8,618
+30
29 Aug 2026, 05:53
8,588
+23
26 Aug 2026, 09:17
8,565
+24
22 Aug 2026, 23:28
8,541
-2
19 Aug 2026, 23:51
8,543
-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:56
8,544
+27
12 Aug 2026, 20:15
8,517
+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:22
8,516
+14
6 Aug 2026, 21:45
8,502
+8
6 Aug 2026, 03:02
8,494
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:15
8,494
first reading
Engagement
368 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 8,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
261 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
261
of 368 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
368 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
438,404
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52m 56s
Average length
1m 16s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
فابریزیو رومانو، اسکای ایتالیا
باشگاه سروت سوئیس برای جذب دیوید داترو فوفانا از چلسی به توافق نهایی رسیده و این بازیکن بهصورت دائمی راهی این باشگاه خواهد شد
مبلغ انتقال ۲.۵ میلیون یورو است و ۱ میلیون یورو نیز بهعنوان پاداشهای احتمالی در نظر گرفته شده است
به این ترتیب، همکاری چلسی و فوفانا به پایان رسیده است
🔗 @ChelseaCF
فابریزیو رومانو، اسکای ایتالیا
تمام مدارک مربوط به انتقال امیلیانو مارتینز بین چلسی و استون ویلا امضا شده است
مبلغ این انتقال ۷.۵ میلیون پوند خواهد بود
🔗 @ChelseaCF
بابی وینسنت، فوتبال لندن
مشخص نیست که جذب لامین کامارا مستقیماً به آینده انزو فرناندز مرتبط باشد. همچنین چلسی قصد دارد در روزهای آینده داریو اسوگو را به صورت قرضی به تیم دیگری واگذار کند
پیتر راتزلر، تایمز
مدیر ورزشی موناکو، تیاگو اسکورو، درِ خروج لامین کامارا را نبسته است و گفت
ما باشگاهی هستیم که بازیکن میفروشد
با این حال، او اعلام کرد که میخواهد کامارا در موناکو بماند و معتقد است این بازیکن میتواند «یکی از…
📲#اپلیکیشن اندروید سایت رومابت
✅ 30% بونوس برای اولین ثبت نام
✅ 10% فری بت از طریق اپلیکیشن
📲برای دانلود از سایت اینجا رو کلیک کنید
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔰همین حالا عضو کانال رومابت شوید 👇
https://t.me/+7RAQsFktKPJhN2I0
🔥💣 پلتفرم جهانی رومابت پلی میان آماتور ماندن وحرفه ای شدن 💣🔥
🙂اگه تا حالا دنبال یه دلیل برای واریز دوباره بودی… این خودشه 👇
✅۲٪ شارژ اضافه روی هر واریز
✅۱۰٪ شرط رایگان بعد از هر تراکنش
#بدون_احراز_هویت 😳🙏🏻
🚀آپشن های کاربران رمزارزی:
💸با هر واریز از طریق رمزارز، هم ۲٪ شارژ بیشتر بگیر و ۱۰٪ شرط رایگان💯
🔝بدون محدودیت هر چند بار بخوای میتونی استفاده کنی‼️‼️
💎چرا رمزارز بهترین گزینهست ⁉️
✔️سقف واریز نامحدود
✔…
ژابی آلونسو درباره غیبت انزو فرناندز مقابل لوتون تاون
ما باید همه چیز را در نظر بگیریم. بازیکنانی که در شرایط خوبی قرار دارند و بازیکنانی که آن انرژی لازم برای بازی کردن را احساس نمیکنند. برای من خیلی مهم است که آنها اشتیاق و میل به بازی کردن را داشته باشند
ژابی آلونسو درباره فعالیتهای نقلوانتقالاتی چلسی
ما تقریباً به برنامهای که داشتیم نزدیک شدهایم. خواهیم دید در نهایت کجا قرار میگیریم. اینکه برنامه بهطور…
مت لاو، تلگراف
چلسی پس از ناکامی در چند تلاش برای جذب الکس اسکات و بررسی شرایط مارتین زوبیمندی، توجه خود را به لامین کامارا معطوف کرده است
چلسی همچنان منتظر دریافت پیشنهاد برای انزو فرناندز است و کامارا بهعنوان جایگزین مستقیم و مشابه انزو در نظر گرفته نمیشود
منچسترسیتی ممکن است مجبور شود مبلغی بیشتر از ۱۲۰ میلیون پوندی که چلسی در ابتدا برای انزو فرناندز تعیین کرده بود، پرداخت کند یا یک ساختار پرداخت مطلوب برای چ…
نیزار کینسلا، BBC
موناکو امیدوار است لامین کامارا را با وجود علاقه چلسی حفظ کند
این باشگاه پیشتر پیشنهاد ۴۳ میلیون پوندی یا بیشتر کریستال پالاس برای این هافبک ملیپوش سنگالی را رد کرده است اما در صورت دریافت پیشنهادی «باورنکردنی» حاضر به بررسی فروش او خواهد بود
چلسی نیز پس از ارزیابی مجدد تورم بازار در پست هافبک، قیمت انزو فرناندز را به بیش از ۱۲۰ میلیون پوند افزایش داده است چرا که پیشنهاد قبلی این باشگاه که حدود…
#فوری از فابریزیو رومانو، اسکای ایتالیا
چلسی و موناکو روز پنجشنبه جلسهای برگزار کردند تا درباره لامین کامارا بهعنوان یکی از گزینههای احتمالی برای خط میانی چلسی گفتوگو کنند
موناکو همچنان امیدوار است کامارا را حفظ کند اما همانطور که پیشتر گزارش شده، این باشگاه همچنان در حال مذاکره برای جذب پاپ ماتار سار از تاتنهام است
مت لاو، تلگراف
تایید شد؛ چلسی به لامین کامارا هافبک موناکو علاقهمند است
با این حال، در حال…
Showing the 12 most recent of 368 posts we hold for @Chelseacf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 368 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
هواداران چلسی | Chelsea @Chelsea_TM · 46,542 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Chelsea FC 🔵 @CFC_ChelseaFC · 137,600 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Premier League 🏆 @PL_PremierLeague · 40,402 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Goal Videos @EuropeanFootball_GoalVideos · 38,660 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
گزارشورزشی @Gsport3 · 84,419 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
طرفداری @tarafdari · 102,561 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
FootFun | فوتفان @FootFun2020 · 83,516 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
⚽️Dashagh News⚽️ @Dashaghnews · 112,324 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
CHELSEA NEWS 🗞️ 🔵 @Chelsea_fc_worldwide · 94,929 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
آپارات اسپرت | AparatSport @aparatsport · 35,476 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
اسپورتینو | SPORTINO @SPORTinoTV · 57,316 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
⚽️ Chelsea Football Club 💙 @ChelseaFcWorldWide_001 · 121,712 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
CHELSEA ANALYSIS 📈🔵 @ChelseaAnalysis · 47,674 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
فابریتزیو رومانو | Fabrizio Romano @FabirizioRomano · 69,534 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
نقل و انتقالات فوتبال @Footitransfers · 69,534 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CHELSEA CF” (@Chelseacf), 8,619 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chelseacf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.