Channel
@caulfild2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,824subscribers
+109 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001325903398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caulfild2 |
| Created | 10 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caulfild2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 11,824 | +14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:07 | 11,810 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:43 | 11,809 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 11,805 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 11,809 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 11,799 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 11,795 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 11,790 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 11,789 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 11,782 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 11,784 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 11,782 | +19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 11,763 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 11,765 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 11,764 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 11,762 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 11,755 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 11,751 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 11,755 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 11,744 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (6 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,430 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
تضاد طبقاتی در این نقاشی از مشتریان یک بار در فیلادلفیا بهخوبی نشان داده شده. در اینجا، زنی از طبقهی کارگر که همراه با کسی دیگر سرگرم نوشیدن یک بطری آبجو است، نگاهِ مردی تنها را به خود کِشیده که شامپانی گرانبها سفارش داده است. یکی از منتقدان امروزی، این مرد مایهدار را چنین توصیف کرد: «عنکبوتی که در کمین مگس نشسته است.» The Rathskeller, 1901. by John Sloan
The Travelers and the Giant, 1869. by Henry Marsh (After John La Farge)
Batman: Dark Victory #3, 1999. by Tim Sale
نوشتهی درون تصویر به کوشش هوشواره: این شعر توصیفی استعاری از یک عروسک خیمهشببازی و کنایهای به زندگی انسانها دارد: نه ذرهای پوست و نه گوشتی در بدن دارد، اما باری سنگین از تلخی و اندوه بر دوش میکشد. پیرمردی است عروسکی (خیمهشببازی)، که از کشیده شدن نخهایش در هراس است. نقش و ظاهر کوچکی به خود میگیرد، تا گرفتاران (و تماشاچیان) را بازی دهد. اما وقتی دستش رو میشود و رازش فاش میگردد، آیا شرمگین است یا نه؟ ای ا…
ماجراهای عبدی یک کتاب مصور است که در سال ۲۰۰۴ توسط مدونا، خوانندهی آمریکایی، نوشته شده. این کتاب داستانی اخلاقی است که از داستانی ۳۰۰ ساله منسوب به خاخام بعل شم توف (Baal Shem Tov) الهام گرفته شده؛ مدونا این داستان را از آموزگار کابالای خود شنیده بود. داستان دربارهی عبدی است که مأمور میشود گردنبندی گرانبها را به ملکه برساند. مدونا برای نوشتن ماجراهای عبدی از فضا و موقعیتهای داستان علیبابا و چهل دزد و دیگر قصهه…
فروید در مقالهی معروفش «امر غریب» در سال ۱۹۱۹ به پدیدهای میپردازد که یک چیز در ابتدا آشناست، اما ناگهان جنبهای عجیب و آزاردهنده پیدا میکند. یکی از برداشتهای مهم فروید این است که «دوگانه» در ابتدا میتوانسته کارکردی مثبت داشته باشد: نوعی تضمین جاودانگی و انکار مرگ. مثلاً اگر تصویری از خودم بسازم، یا باور کنم یک «همزاد» دارم، انگار بخشی از من میتواند بعد از مرگم هم باقی بماند. اما بعدها همین دوگانه میتواند برعک…
1980-2000. by Harry Gruyaert
مارتین بوبر میگه انسان در تنهایی «من» مستقلی نداره، و «من» انسان در رابطه با «دیگری» پدید میاد. خودشیفته، کسی که میخواد مدام بدون رابطهٔ برابر، مدام با دیگری «من» خودش رو تغذیه کنه، چون رابطهای نداره، «من»ش رو هم از دست میده و خلأ درونش مدام بزرگتر میشه. © hacolhavel
Dragon Ball
توی فیلم «گشتزنی» (Cruising) یک صحنهی بازجویی نابهنجار هست که ویلیام فریدکین (کارگردان) میگه از یک افسانه محلی که درباره یک افسر شهربانی نیویورک شنیده، الهام گرفته. توی این روش، کسی رو که ریخت خندهداری داشت میفرستادن تا مظنون رو گوشمالی بده. این شگرد اونقدر باورنکردنی بود که هرگونه دادخواستی در دادگاه رد میشد و هیچکس این داستان رو باور نمیکرد. Cruising (1980) dir. William Friedkin
Wave in Backlight. by Peter Witt (German, b. 1966)
گوگوش و مهین شهابی در نمایی از فیلم «بیتا»، ساخته هژیر داریوش، به سال ۱۳۵۱. © HalghehMag
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @caulfild2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Archive (The Catcher in the Rye)” (@caulfild2), 11,824 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caulfild2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.