از هیجانِ یوشیجخوانیِ یک سینهفیل: مفتونِ «اندوهناکِ شب*» نیما شدهام؛ آن جبروتِ شومِ طبیعت، آن قیرگونیِ شب، وحشتِ دریا و جنونِ درّهها. و آخ از «عنکبوتِ رنگ»؛ چه ترکیبی، چه تخیلی. فکر کنید به این ترکیب؛ طبیعت دوربین دارد انگاری و میزانسن. مدام از خودم میپرسم سینماتوگرافیِ نیما چه وحشتِ چندلایهای میتوانست داشته باشد. گوتیکِ صخرهها، مِهای که دوالپاست، یا شقاوتِ نسیم. همان زیباییِ منحوسِ رمانتیکهای قرن نوزدهم،…

Channel
تصویر و زندگی
@poster_cinematography
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,291subscribers
+71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001106954023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poster_cinematography |
| Created | 24 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poster_cinematography |
Topic
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 13,291 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 13,292 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 13,286 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 13,282 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 13,276 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 13,272 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 13,264 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 13,262 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 13,261 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 13,258 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 13,257 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 13,254 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 13,255 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 13,257 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 13,254 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 13,248 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 13,251 | +8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 13,243 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 13,241 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 13,237 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.8%
- avg views ÷ 13,291 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,440
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (14 May 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,610 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @poster_cinematography. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🔻 در نشست هشتم از سلسلهنشستهای «حیوانیت» با عنوان لابستر؛ یک فیگور تاریخی و ادبی، دربارهی لابستر حرف میزنیم. لابستر در هنر و ادبیات غرب حضوری دیرپا و چندلایه دارد، از اسطوره و فلسفه یونان و روم تا ادبیات مدرن و هنر قرن بیستم، از بهشت گمشده جان میلتون تا نقاشی های طبیعت بی جان، از سالوادور دالی و ساموئل بکت تا تیاسالیوت و در نهایت مقالهی مشهور دیوید فاستر والاس با عنوان به لابستر بیاندیش. این فیگور همزمان خوراک…
🔻 نشستیم با آرش قجرجزی دربارهی فیلمِ "اتاقهای پشتی" حرف زدیم. از شکل جدیدی از فیلمسازی که سینماتوگرافی رو از بیرون از خودِ سینما میاره: از داستانهای وحشتِ وایرال شده در فضای اینترنت، مناطق متروکهی دیجیتال و بازیهای آنلاین. گفتوگوی خوبی شد. خاصه اگر سینمایی، معمار و یا نویسندهاید، از دستش ندید◾️ تصویر و زندگی
🔻 «آگونیا»ی الم کلیموف رو دیدهاید [اینجا تماشا کنید]؟ همان کارگردانِ فیلمِ مهمِ "بیا و بنگر". فیلم آشکارا پروپاگانداست؛ علیه فیگورِ گریگوری راسپوتین. فیلم با نقلقولی از لنین علیه راسپوتین شروع میشود و راسپوتین را هیولایی شهوتران و خشن تصویر میکند. ازین جهت انگاری فیلمهای صداوسیما درباره طاغوت را میبینی. سیاهِ سیاه. ولی چیزی که مهم است: کلیموف حاضر نیست سینما را فدای پیام کند. میزانسنهای بینظیرِ باروکی، مونتاژ…
علی جمشیدی عزیز (تصویر و زندگی) اخیراً پست انتقادی خوبی دربارهٔ مجموعهٔ «به روایت یک شاهد عینی» آزاده اخلاقی منتشر کرده. از چگونگی مرگ دیگر چهرههای مشهور این مجموعه بیخبرم، اما از آنجا که سالها بر زندگی و سینمای سهراب شهیدثالث کار کردهام؛ از این رو یک ایراد اساسی میگیرم و به آن پست اضافه میکنم. تصویر نخست، صحنهٔ بازسازیشده است: مورخ ۱۰ تیر ۱۳۷۷ در شیکاگو، سهراب را جلوی درب خانه، غرق در خون میبینیم. تا اینج…
چهارشنبه ۲۱ مرداد، پس از هشت ماه تأخیر ناخواسته، هفتمین جلسه از سلسلهنشستها دربارهی مفهوم حیوانیت را با حضور رضا نگارستانی، فیلسوف ایرانی-آمریکایی، برگزار کردیم. بحث از الکساندر بوگدانوف و تکتولوژی شروع شد؛ از ایدهی علم عام سازمان، از اینکه بتوان زیست، جامعه، فناوری، اندیشه و در نهایت هر آنچه را که سازمان مییابد، از خلال فرایندهای اتصال، گسست، تعادل و بازسازمانیابی فهمید. اما مسئله خیلی زود از صورت فعلی چیزها …
🔻 چیزکی نوشتم دربارهی زنانِ فیلمسازِ محبوبم؛ آنها که فیلم میسازند همچنان؛ البته نیشگونی هم گرفتم از مفروضاتِ جاافتاده و هویتمحور تحت لوای "سینمای زنانه". اینجا بخوانید و نظرتان را برایم بنویسید◾️ تصویر و زندگی
🔻 دیدم کسی به نقل از کافکا نوشته: "نامه، تقریبا یک دیدار است". آشنا اومد برام ولی شک کردم که اینرا کافکا عیناً نگفته. رفتم و کاملش رو در نامهای به میلنا، در مه ۱۹۲۰، یافتم: «نامهات بسیاری از تردیدها را کنار میزند؛ تو را روشنتر میبینم، حرکتهای بدنت و دستهایت را، چنان سریع و مصمم؛ تقریباً یک دیدار است.»◾️ تصویر و زندگی
🔻 کسی رو میشناسید روی نسبتِ مفهومیِ شعرهای نیما یوشیج و سینماتوگرافی پژوهش کرده باشه؟ خاصه اونایی که آکندهست از مه، باران، جنگل، کوه و صداهایی که از دل تاریکی میاند. در برخی کارهاش، نوعی ناتورالیسم از جنسِ هرتزوگی وجود نداره؟ همان طبیعتِ عظیم، بیاعتنا و جنونزایی که در سینماتوگرافیِ "آگیره، خشم پروردگار" و "فیتزکارالدو" میبینیم. مثلا در شعر «هست شب»، طبیعت نیروی هیولاوشِ فضاست، نیرویی که بر ما انگاری که بتازد: هس…
🔻 جلسهی هفتم از سلسلهنشست حیوانیت ژرفنای تنِ جمعی: بوگدانوف و مسئلهٔ تکتولوژی با رضا نگارستانی در نشست هفتم از سلسلهنشستهای «حیوانیت» میزبان رضا نگارستانی، فیلسوف و نظریهپرداز ایرانی خواهیم بود. نگارستانی از متفکرانیست که فلسفه را به ابزاری برای بازطراحی جهان تبدیل میکنند. در آثار او، منطق، علم، هنر و سیاست در ساختاری دقیق و جسورانه به هم میرسند و مرزهای معمول اندیشیدن از نو ترسیم میشوند. برای شرکت در این …
🔻 مشتاقانه منتظرم رمان تازهی آیدا مرادی آهنی، «آوازهای چند فیلسوار» رو بخوانم. رسیدنِ سریعِ یه رمان فارسی به چاپ دوم، در این روزگار، تداعیِ حسی در حال احتضاره: شوق جمعی برای انتشار یک رمان، دست به دستشدنش میان خوانندگان و انتظار برای رسیدن نوبت خواندنش. چیزی که زمانی بخشی متداول از زندگی فرهنگی ما بود و حالا در حال انقراض. «آوازهای چند فیلسوار» رمانیست که از بخشی از ویرانههای تاریخمون آواربرداری میکنه، از خل…
🔻 چند روز پیش یه قرار انلاین گذاشتیم تا تحشیهای بریم بر "مسالهی اقتباس سینمایی از ادبیات". اینم فایل صوتیش. اگر حساش رو دارید گوش کنید. از بُردار گوستاو فلوبر به اقتباسِ الیویرا از مادام بووآری، توماس مان به ویسکونتی تا چخوف به وانگ بینگ و البته همینگوی به ناصر تقوایی، چیزکهایی گفتیم◾️ تصویر و زندگی
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @poster_cinematography. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@poster_cinematography named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,389
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,704
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@honartohi · 27,243
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
@caulfild · 33,033
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,187
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@bankema · 31,968
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@owrsi · 55,042
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@Theaterstudies · 29,880
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@tarjomaanweb · 42,875
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
@litera999 · 74,481
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@NashrAasoo · 29,400
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
@Official_MohsenNamjoo · 45,101
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@classicmusic3 · 40,655
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تصویر و زندگی” (@poster_cinematography), 13,291 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poster_cinematography.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.