Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cinémathèque

Channel

Cinémathèque

@Ciinemathequee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,175subscribers

+2,088 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002291115492
TypeChannel
Username@Ciinemathequee
Description@CiinemathequeBookstore | @Whohamidd [This Channel is not intended to violate any condition of use. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, scholarship and research.]
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ciinemathequee

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0879,1758,1317 August 2026 — 7,087 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,096 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,186 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,303 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,416 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,517 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,606 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,606 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,643 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,742 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,823 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,954 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,044 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,193 subscribers1 October 2026 — 8,621 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,734 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,825 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,879 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,926 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,966 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,011 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,049 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,101 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,175 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net +2,088. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,774–9,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 07:299,175+74
31 Oct 2026, 23:489,101+52
28 Oct 2026, 15:559,049+38
25 Oct 2026, 21:569,011+45
22 Oct 2026, 16:118,966+40
19 Oct 2026, 00:458,926+47
16 Oct 2026, 07:558,879+54
13 Oct 2026, 16:378,825+91
7 Oct 2026, 20:588,734+113
1 Oct 2026, 12:598,621+428
16 Sept 2026, 18:408,193+149
13 Sept 2026, 03:168,044+90
9 Sept 2026, 12:197,954+131
4 Sept 2026, 10:167,823+81
31 Aug 2026, 14:557,742+99
28 Aug 2026, 13:077,643+37
26 Aug 2026, 11:117,606no change
25 Aug 2026, 03:447,606+89
21 Aug 2026, 11:167,517+101
18 Aug 2026, 00:357,416first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.7%
avg views ÷ 9,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,560
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held29 (20 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total95,680
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
360
Videos
66
Links
94

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 51s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 29 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ciinemathequee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 21:59 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

«او مثل یک قُمری بی‌دفاع است و موهایش به رنگ پوستِ درختِ زیتون در بهار...» — میکل‌آنجلو سرخ، آنتونیونی آبی، موری پومرانس، ۲۰۱۱. Red Desert (Michelangelo Antonioni, 1964) @Ciinemathequee

4 Nov 2026, 21:35 UTC≈2,210 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

مرا باور داشته باش: کسی که عقلش را در برابر برخی مسائل از دست نمی‌دهد، به این دلیل است که عقلی ندارد تا از دست بدهد. این عبارتی‌ست که هیچ‌وقت ارزش خود را از دست نداده و یادآور این است که در موقعیتی سخت و دشوار، می‌توان عقل را از دست داد. —میشائیل هانکه تصویر: چهارده سال پیش، در یکی از همین روزها. @Ciinemathequee

4 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC≈2,740 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

ادای احترام دیوی چو به عباس کیارستمی Like Someone in Love (Kiarostami, 2012) Return to Seoul (Chou, 2022) @Ciinemathequee

3 Nov 2026, 22:41 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

سهراب شهیدثالث و ابرهارد شوی سر صحنۀ گل‌های رز برای آفریقا، ۱۹۹۱. - سررشته‌داری: این آخرین فیلمی بود که در آلمان ساختی؟ - شهیدثالث: این آخرین فیلمی بود که در عمرم ساختم. Eberhard Scheu und Sohrab Shahid Saless, Anfang 1991 bei den Dreharbeiten zum Fernsehfilm Rosen für Afrika. @Ciinemathequee

3 Nov 2026, 21:53 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

خاطرم آمد که در فرزندخواندۀ ویرانگر هم لحظات بونوئلی داریم. مثلاً در همین صحنه، زوجی که دخترک حاضر در تصویر را به فرزندخواندگی قبول کرده‌اند، یک روز دسته‌جمعی می‌روند پیک‌نیک که ناگهان در همین لحظه مورچه‌ها حمله‌ور می‌شوند روی دست‌و‌پای مادرخوانده. مورچه‌هایی که یادآور سگ اندلسی‌ بونوئل‌اند. «من توی این فیلم، برای چندمین بار توی فیلم‌هام، خیلی سوررئالیست‌بازی درآوردم.» —در گفتگو با مهدی سررشته‌داری Wechselbalg (Sha…

3 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTC≈2,500 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

در پیوست پست قبلی، این هم شباهت جالبی‌ست که ممکن است اتفاقی هم نباشد. با توجه به نزدیکیِ مدل شخصیت فیلم بونوئل در مقایسه با صاحب فاحشه‌خانه در اتوپیای شهیدثالث که هردو به نوعی درگیر پارانویا بودند. Él (Buñuel, 1953) Utopia (Shahid-Saless, 1983) @Ciinemathequee

3 Nov 2026, 21:10 UTC≈2,590 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

یکی از نکاتی که در آثار شهیدثالث –که خود از ستایش‌گران لوئیس بونوئل بود– کمتر به آن‌ توجه کرده‌اند، رگه‌هایی از سوررئالیسم جاری در سینمای بونوئل می‌باشد. این تأثیر نه در قالب تقلید از او، بلکه در آمیختن امر روزمره با امر نامعقول و ایجاد شکافی ظریف در منطق واقعیت نمود پیدا می‌کند. به طور مثال در خاطرات یک عاشق، جسد دوست‌دختر مایکل باوئر، بیش از یک هفته زیر تخت او مانده و هیچ بویی نگرفته است؛ در حالی که باوئر در نامه ب…

1 Nov 2026, 22:05 UTC≈5,390 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

گفت از دست من کاری بر نمی‌آید کاش گفته بود از دلم —عباس کیارستمی عکس از عباس کیارستمی، بدون عنوان، ۱۳۸۷. @Ciinemathequee

28 Oct 2026, 21:46 UTC≈5,510 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Video

من برای «فرمان نهم» به موسیقی کلاسیک نیاز داشتم، اما می‌خواستم آهنگساز فیلم، زبیگنیف پرایزنر، آن را بنویسد. او هم این موسیقی سبک‌وار را ساخت. بعداً لازم شد که شخصیت‌های فیلم نام آن آهنگساز کلاسیک را به زبان بیاورند. از آنجا که هلند را دوست دارم، پس فکر کردم می‌تواند آهنگسازی هلندی از اواخر قرن هفدهم و اوایل قرن هجدهم باشد. به سفارت هلند رفتم و نام افرادی از آن دوره را خواستم. از میان فهرستی نسبتاً بلند، نام وان دن بو…

23 Oct 2026, 10:27 UTC≈6,120 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

یکی از اعضای کانال امروز بر سر مزار گونگادین رفته و عکسی از آن هم برای ما ارسال کرده. با تشکر از ایشان. تصویر سمت چپ، مزار قدیمی‌ست و تصویر سمت راست هم، سنگ قبر تازه‌ای که بر روی آن انداخته‌اند. @Ciinemathequee

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Ciinemathequee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cinémathèque” (@Ciinemathequee), 9,175 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ciinemathequee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.