Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 78 days, net -390. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 280,368–283,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 12:56
280,775
-110
22 Oct 2026, 14:11
280,885
-110
21 Oct 2026, 06:00
280,995
-63
20 Oct 2026, 04:07
281,058
-54
19 Oct 2026, 02:18
281,112
+37
18 Oct 2026, 05:10
281,075
-13
17 Oct 2026, 05:35
281,088
-87
16 Oct 2026, 07:27
281,175
-67
15 Oct 2026, 09:54
281,242
-58
14 Oct 2026, 07:30
281,300
-79
12 Oct 2026, 15:39
281,379
-329
8 Oct 2026, 03:41
281,708
-411
3 Oct 2026, 14:54
282,119
-340
24 Sept 2026, 22:17
282,459
-522
18 Sept 2026, 14:37
282,981
-236
16 Sept 2026, 09:01
283,217
-88
14 Sept 2026, 17:18
283,305
-90
13 Sept 2026, 04:18
283,395
-94
11 Sept 2026, 07:00
283,489
+150
8 Sept 2026, 09:01
283,339
first reading
Engagement
228 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 164 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.30%
avg views ÷ 280,775 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,100
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 228 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held
228 (31 July 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total
1,461,640
Reactions total
26,489
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 04:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈418
Videos
≈654
Links
≈1,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
17m 53s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
91,485 reactions across 215 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50,865
55.6%
👍
28,741
31.4%
👌
2,933
3.21%
😭
2,862
3.13%
👏
1,676
1.83%
😢
1,655
1.81%
💯
1,478
1.62%
🙏
353
0.386%
👎
264
0.289%
🔥
213
0.233%
🥰
183
0.2%
😍
124
0.136%
😎
50
0.055%
😇
24
0.026%
🎉
20
0.022%
🤩
19
0.021%
😱
16
0.017%
😘
9
0.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 221 of the 228 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94,542 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 228 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 221 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sepblog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 228 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
چون چند نفر از دوستان پرسیدند گفتم بهتره برای همه عزیزان توضیح بدم
تفاوت طرحوارهها و اختلالهای شخصیت چیه؟
طرحوارهها، الگوی عمیق فکری و هیجانی هستن که معمولاً در اثر تجربههای زندگی شکل میگیرن و روی احساسات، روابط و رفتارهای ما تأثیر میذارن
مثلاً کسی که طرحواره رهاشدگی داره، ممکنه دائماً از دست دادن آدمهای مهم زندگیش بترسه و یا کسی که طرحواره شکست داره،
حتی با وجود موفقیتهای زیاد، خودش رو کافی ندونه
اما اختلا…
سعی کردم شفاف سازی کنم انگار بدتر شد😅
یکبار دیگه خلاصه تر میگم
توضیحات طرحوارهها: رایگان
دوره طرحوارهدرمانی: غیر رایگان
اگر فقط میخواهید متوجه بشید کدام طرحوارهها را دارید و توضیحات کلی را بشنوید و تست هر طرحواره را بزنید روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید
📍لیست اپیزودهای طرحوارهها در پادکست صلح درون
۱۸ طرحواره اصلی را توضیح دادم
اگر میدونید کدام طرحوارهها را دارید و دنبال راهکار درمانش هستید، از طریق آیدی زیر، دوره طرح…
دوستان عزیزم یک نکتهای رو بگم
توضیحات طرحوارهها از ۷ سال پیش به صورت رایگان و در صلح درون تولید شده، تست هم داره حتی!
چون خیلی از دوستان میپرسن که دوره طرحواره درمانی، راهکار داره یا توضیحات طرحوارهها هست؟
خواستم بگم توضیحات طرحوارهها سالهاست که رایگان در اختیارتونه
این دوره طرحوارهدرمانی هم راهکارهای حل طرحوارههاست، برای کسی که دنبال تغییره
پس در واقع برای تهیه راهکارهای حل طرحوارهها میتونید دوره طرحواره…
ممکنه در ظاهر آدم موفق و دوستداشتنیای باشی، اما درونت باور داشته باشی که اگر دیگران واقعاً تو رو بشناسن، نظرشون دربارهات عوض میشه.
از اشتباهاتت خجالت میکشی.
نقاط ضعفت رو پنهان میکنی.
و وقتی کسی ازت انتقاد میکنه، فقط به رفتارش فکر نمیکنی؛ با خودت میگی: «دیدی؟ من واقعاً کافی نیستم.»
در طرحواره نقص و شرم، فرد احساس میکنه در عمق وجودش ایرادی هست که باعث میشه شایسته عشق و پذیرش نباشه.
این با داشتن اعتمادبهن…
گاهی در رابطهای هستی، آدمهای زیادی هم اطرافت هستن، اما باز احساس تنهایی میکنی.
وقتی ناراحتی، کسی متوجه نمیشه.
وقتی به حمایت نیاز داری، نمیدونی از چه کسی کمک بخوای.
و وقتی از احساساتت حرف میزنی، انگار چیزی که نیاز داری بهت نمیرسه.
در طرحواره محرومیت هیجانی، فرد انتظار داره نیازهای عاطفیاش مثل درک شدن، محبت، حمایت و توجه بهاندازه کافی برآورده نشن.
گاهی به همین دلیل به آدمهایی جذب میشیم که از نظر عاطفی در …
چرا حتی وقتی کسی باهات خوبه، ته دلت منتظری یک روز بهت آسیب بزنه؟
به حرفهاش شک میکنی.
دنبال نشونههای پنهان در رفتارش میگردی.
سخت میتونی باور کنی که کسی بدون منفعت شخصی کنارت باشه.
در طرحواره بیاعتمادی و بدرفتاری، ذهن انتظار داره دیگران در نهایت فریبش بدن، تحقیرش کنن، ازش سوءاستفاده کنن یا بهش آسیب بزنن.
این انتظار گاهی از تجربههای واقعی و دردناک گذشته میاد؛ تجربههایی که باعث شدن اعتماد کردن خطرناک به نظر بر…
چرا وقتی یکی رو دوست داری، بیشتر از اینکه از بودنش لذت ببری، از، از دست دادنش میترسی؟
با دیر جواب دادن پیامش مضطرب میشی.
با کمی فاصله گرفتنش، هزار سناریو توی ذهنت میسازی.
و حتی وقتی رابطه خوبه، ته دلت نگران روزی هستی که ممکنه ترکت کنه.
در طرحواره رهاشدگی، ذهن ما به ناپایدار بودن رابطهها حساسه؛ انگار همیشه باید آماده رفتن آدمها باشیم.
این الگو ممکنه در تجربههای اولیه رابطه شکل گرفته باشه؛ مثلاً وقتی مراقبت عا…
ازم پرسیدند:
چرا بعضی آدمها
حتی وقتی بزرگ میشن،
هنوز دنبال تأیید دیگرانن؟
گفتم:…
چون اولین کسی که
به ما یاد میده
خودمون رو چطور ببینیم،
اغلب مادره…
کودک قبل از اینکه
خودش رو بشناسه،
از نگاه مادرش یاد میگیره
چقدر دوستداشتنیه…
اگر مادرش اشتباهاتش رو
با تحقیر جواب بده،
ممکنه یاد بگیره
برای دوستداشتنی بودن،
باید بینقص باشه…
اگر همیشه با دیگران
مقایسه بشه،
ممکنه سالها بعد هم
موفقیتهاش رو ببینه،
اما خودش رو کافی…
بیشترِ آرامش روانت رو کدوم یکی از اینها میگیره؟
۱. فکر کردن مداوم به اتفاقات گذشته
۲. نگرانی درباره آینده و اتفاقاتی که هنوز نیفتادن
۳. حساسیت به رفتار و نظر دیگران
۴. ترس از اشتباه کردن و کافی نبودن
۵. ناتوانی در رها کردن موضوعاتی که خارج از کنترل تو هستن
گاهی اولین قدم برای تغییر، این نیست که فوراً راهحل پیدا کنیم؛ اینه که دقیقتر بفهمیم چه چیزی داره انرژی روانی ما رو مصرف میکنه.
برای شرکت در دوره ذهن آ…
خیلی وقتها برای بهتر شدن حال روانمون، سعی میکنیم شرایط بیرونی رو تغییر بدیم.
رابطهمون رو درست کنیم.
کارمون رو تغییر بدیم.
مشکلاتمون رو حل کنیم.
از آدمهایی که ناراحتمون میکنن فاصله بگیریم.
و البته که شرایط بیرونی مهمه.
اما مسئله اینجاست که حتی وقتی بعضی مشکلات حل میشن، ممکنه ذهنمون همچنان ناآروم بمونه.
چون گاهی فقط با یک مشکل بیرونی روبهرو نیستیم؛ با الگویی از نگرانی، پیشبینی اتفاقات بد، نشخوار فکری و تلاش…
یک سؤال مهم:
اگر فکر کردنِ زیاد قراره بهت آرامش بده، چرا بعد از ساعتها فکر کردن، گاهی از قبل هم آشفتهتری؟
چون بین حل مسئله و نشخوار فکری تفاوت وجود داره.
در حل مسئله، فکر کردن به تصمیم یا اقدام مشخصی میرسه.
اما در نشخوار فکری، بارها به یک موضوع برمیگردیم، بدون اینکه اطلاعات تازهای به دست بیاریم یا به راهحل جدیدی برسیم.
مثلاً بهجای اینکه بررسی کنیم در یک رابطه چه کاری از دستمون برمیاد، بارها از خودمون میپ…
اضطراب همیشه با تپش قلب، لرزش یا احساس ترس شدید خودش رو نشون نمیده.
گاهی اضطراب یعنی:
• مدام پیام دیگران رو بررسی کنی تا مطمئن بشی ازت ناراحت نیستن.
• بعد از هر گفتوگو، ساعتها به حرفهات فکر کنی.
• برای تصمیمهای ساده هم به اطمینان دیگران نیاز داشته باشی.
• وقتی کاری رو کامل انجام ندادی، نتونی از خودت راضی باشی.
• در لحظههای خوب زندگی هم منتظر یک اتفاق بد باشی.
گاهی چیزی که ما بهعنوان کمالگرایی، حساسیت یا مس…
❤247👍81😭16👌8
Signed Sepblog
Showing the 12 most recent of 228 posts we hold for @Sepblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Sepblog edited 15 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
با مثالهایی که زدم به نظرت تو هم درگیر طرحواره خویشتنداری ناکافی هستی؟
آره61%
نه39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 228 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مصطفی عرفی | Ravan.Darmani @ravandarmaani · 34,647 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 2 September 2026
هاوین | مدرسه توسعه دختران @havin_hosseiny · 50,762 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Sep Pod @sepblogmusic · 59,927 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr.mostafanaeimi @drmostafanaeimi · 139,787 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
روانشناسی|محمد وظیفه شناس @mohamadvzs · 32,539 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
MrOrdibeheshti @mrordibeheshti · 37,814 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
دکتر مریم آقایی | روانشناس بالینی @dr_maryamaghaei · 39,729 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
روابط عاطفی با ساناز شفیعی @sanaz_shafieiii · 122,723 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
Tinas @itstinass · 26,084 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
دکتر شیری @drshiri · 97,322 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Mojtaba Shakori مجتبی شکوری @mojtabashakoori_fan · 22,644 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
مدیتیشن | حسین عرب زاده @meditation_hosin · 25,364 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
هانی پیروزرام🫧🪞 @honeyprrofficial · 43,489 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
امید امانی | Omid Amani @dr_amaniiiii · 96,350 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
زندگی سالم (سوده هروی) روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @zendeegiesaleem · 156,757 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
صلاح الدین سنگ چین | رواندرمانگر @Online_counsel · 22,585 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
Hosein @hoseinmind · 280,772 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
•| #نرگس_صرافیان_طوفان |• @narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,426 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
ایمان سرورپور | روان درمانگر @imansarvarpour_masir_academy · 51,385 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
در مسیرِ آگاهی🌱 @zohre_moradi_channel · 22,610 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
پادکست روانشناسی سايكوپاد @psychopod · 23,330 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
جافکری @jafekri_podcast1 · 35,029 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Anousha @anousha_eternal · 82,426 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
نرگس صرافیان @ntoofan · 20,142 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sepblog | سپهر خدابنده” (@Sepblog), 280,775 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sepblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.