Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 94 days, net -252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,399–32,772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 14:00
32,442
-3
7 Nov 2026, 11:26
32,445
-6
6 Nov 2026, 07:50
32,451
-9
5 Nov 2026, 10:26
32,460
-4
4 Nov 2026, 12:45
32,464
+4
3 Nov 2026, 15:26
32,460
-2
2 Nov 2026, 18:31
32,462
-20
1 Nov 2026, 18:10
32,482
+3
31 Oct 2026, 15:05
32,479
-8
30 Oct 2026, 15:17
32,487
-7
29 Oct 2026, 12:15
32,494
-10
28 Oct 2026, 13:18
32,504
-5
27 Oct 2026, 15:05
32,509
-10
26 Oct 2026, 15:07
32,519
-7
25 Oct 2026, 13:46
32,526
-11
24 Oct 2026, 13:39
32,537
-2
23 Oct 2026, 10:30
32,539
-4
22 Oct 2026, 10:46
32,543
+24
21 Oct 2026, 03:50
32,519
-13
20 Oct 2026, 00:36
32,532
first reading
Engagement
113 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.7%
avg views ÷ 32,442 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,600
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 113 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
113 (22 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
347,506
Reactions total
14,088
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈172
Links
≈97
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
60,067 reactions across 112 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31,737
52.8%
👍
18,266
30.4%
💔
5,459
9.09%
👏
1,825
3.04%
🍓
1,027
1.71%
😢
772
1.29%
😍
261
0.435%
👀
242
0.403%
🤩
158
0.263%
🔥
116
0.193%
💅
110
0.183%
⚡
40
0.067%
☃
31
0.052%
💋
23
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 112 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mohamadvzs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 113 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
و اگر زندگی باعث شده از بقیه عقب بیفتی، با خودت خیلی سختگیر نباش.
شاید ببینی آدمهایی که همسنوسالت هستن، فارغالتحصیل میشن، شغل پیدا میکنن، کسبوکار خودشون رو راه میاندازن، مستقل میشن، خونهی خودشون رو میخرن یا اجاره میکنن و کمکم مسیر زندگیشون رو پیدا میکنن؛ در حالی که تو هنوز داری تلاش میکنی زندگی خودت رو سر و سامان بدی.
میخوام بگم اگه توی مسیر هدفتی دلسرد نباش
زمان درخشش توام میرسه
هر پروانهای برای مت…
یکی از نشونه های رابطه سالم اینه دلشون برای بگو مگو غرغرهای همدیگه هم تنگ میشه
ناز کردن و ناز کشیدن، پیشقدم شدن برای اشتی، شوخی کردن برای عوض کردن مودش
همهی اینا چیزهاییه که همون غرغرها و بگومگو ها توی رابطه سالم ایجادش می کنن
این یه حقیقت جالبه که شاید تا حالا بهش فکر نکرده باشی: آدما، به شکل عجیبوغریبی، دوست دارن تو موفق بشی.
وقتی میری مصاحبهی کاری، مصاحبهکننده دلش میخواد تو اونقدر خوب باشی که دیگه لازم نباشه دنبال آدم دیگهای بگرده.
وقتی با کسی قرار میذاری، اونم دوست داره یه قرار فوقالعاده رو باهات تجربه کنه.
وقتی محتوا تولید میکنی، آدما دنبال دیدن محتوای خوبن و چه بهتر که اون محتوای خوب، مال تو باشه.
همین که این طرز فکر رو کنار…
روانتون رو بازیچه یه مشت کانال که از وضعیت موجود دنبال ماهی گرفتن هستن با عناوینی مثل خبر جنگ و پیشگویی زمان جنگ قرار ندید
هیچ دیتای بدرد بخوری قرار نیست تحویلتون بدن
یه سری از ادم ها کلا کم شعور و بی فرهنگن قبول اما اجازه دادن بهشون که تا حد زیادی بخوان توی زندگیت دخالت کنن یا هر حرفی رو بهت بزنن هم تا حدی دست خودته
شاید واکنش به موقع و درستی بهشون نشون ندادی
شاید عاشقانهترین چیزی که یک نفر میتونه بهت بده، نه هیجان و دلشورهی عاشقی، بلکه حسِ اطمینان و آرامشه.
اینکه بدونی با یه گفتوگوی سخت، ترکت نمیکنه؛ با یه حال بد، محبتش نسبت بهت از بین نمیره؛ و برای دوستداشتنی بودن، لازم نیست مدام خودت رو بهش ثابت کنی.
اینکه بدونی همونطوری که هستی، دوستت داره.
چطور موفق بشیم:
عاشق رد شدن و جواب منفی شنیدن باش
حاضر باش سالها احمق به نظر برسی و توی چشم نباشی
خیلی بیشتر از بقیه به مسیرت ادامه بده، حتی وقتی همه دست از تلاش کشیدن.
برای بچه هاتون همه کار نکنید
همه چیز تهیه نکنید
یه چیزی که من این روزها توی پدر و مادرها زیاد می بینم میگن من خودم دلم می خواست نداشتم نمی خوام حسرتش به دل بچم بمونه
این طرز فکر از روی مهربون بودنتونه اما نه تنها خوب نیست بلکه به بچه اسیب هم میزنه
بچه باید یاد بگیره خودش مسئولیت قبول کنه خودش کارهاش رو حل کنه باید بفهمه قرار نیست توی این دنیا همه چیز براش حاضر باشه باید با مفهوم نرسیدن و فقدان اشنا بشه تا وقتی بزرگ ش…
من بهترین زوج هایی که دیدم اونایی نبودن که بحثی نداشتن اونایی بودن که همو بلد بودن
می دونستن تا کجا ناراحتی رو ادامه بدن
چجوری از دل هم در بیارن
چقدر قهر بمونن و ...
❤235👍71😍13😢4🍓2👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @mohamadvzs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @mohamadvzs as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
نشر میلکان | Milkan @nashremilkan · 32,079 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
امید امانی | Omid Amani @dr_amaniiiii · 97,687 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
اَميرعلى قِ @amiralichannel · 68,112 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Sepblog | سپهر خدابنده @Sepblog · 280,422 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
MrOrdibeheshti @mrordibeheshti · 37,642 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
کتابخانه @booksofus · 51,705 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Mehrsasharoleslam @mehrsasharoleslam · 36,642 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
alirezaajafarzadeh @alirezaajafarzadeh · 49,298 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Soheyl English | انگلیسی کاربردی با سهیل سام @soheyl_english · 58,792 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی|محمد وظیفه شناس” (@mohamadvzs), 32,442 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohamadvzs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
