Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,711. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167,395–169,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:20
167,652
-50
15 Sept 2026, 12:38
167,702
-46
13 Sept 2026, 18:22
167,748
-69
11 Sept 2026, 21:17
167,817
-123
9 Sept 2026, 13:58
167,940
-100
6 Sept 2026, 05:39
168,040
-74
4 Sept 2026, 01:38
168,114
-77
2 Sept 2026, 12:23
168,191
-57
1 Sept 2026, 14:04
168,248
-43
31 Aug 2026, 17:04
168,291
-32
30 Aug 2026, 17:26
168,323
-42
29 Aug 2026, 19:54
168,365
-30
28 Aug 2026, 19:53
168,395
-26
27 Aug 2026, 18:24
168,421
-34
26 Aug 2026, 21:33
168,455
-33
25 Aug 2026, 21:23
168,488
-24
24 Aug 2026, 21:49
168,512
-65
23 Aug 2026, 07:47
168,577
-73
21 Aug 2026, 20:05
168,650
-74
20 Aug 2026, 13:12
168,724
first reading
Engagement
300 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.93%
avg views ÷ 167,652 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,950
205 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.942%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
205
of 300 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
300 (3 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
2,039,040
Reactions total
19,203
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 19:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,140
Videos
≈3,660
Links
≈507
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29,736 reactions across 297 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15,353
51.6%
👍
9,073
30.5%
💔
2,716
9.13%
😢
703
2.36%
😭
486
1.63%
🔥
451
1.52%
💯
266
0.895%
👀
171
0.575%
❤🔥
132
0.444%
🤝
99
0.333%
😍
93
0.313%
🍾
48
0.161%
🤔
47
0.158%
🙏
26
0.087%
🤣
19
0.064%
💅
12
0.04%
💋
12
0.04%
🤗
12
0.04%
🎄
10
0.034%
🆒
5
0.017%
1 further kind
2
0.007%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 300 of the 300 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,906 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 300 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 300 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SoulofDream. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 300 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
لائوتسه آب را نماد قدرتی میدانست که با زور پیروز نمیشود.
آب نرم است، اما صخره را در طول زمان تغییر میدهد؛ چون بهجای جنگیدن با هر مانع، مسیر خود را پیدا میکند.
هر انعطافی ضعف نیست؛ بعضی چیزها دقیقاً بهخاطر نرمبودن دوام میآورند...
@SoulofDream✅
زمان همهچیز را درمان نمیکند؛ بعضی زخمها را فقط قابلتحملتر میکند.
اما همین فاصله، به آدم فرصت میدهد از میان درد، چیزهایی را ببیند که در لحظهی حادثه پنهان بودند.
زمان پزشکِ معجزهگر نیست؛ شاهدیست که کمک میکند واقعیت را بهتر بفهمیم...
- ویکتور هوگو
@SoulofDream✅
جبران خلیل جبران میگفت فرزندان از آنِ والدین نیستند؛ زندگی از مسیر آنها عبور میکند.
هر انسانی باید فرصت داشته باشد راه خودش را پیدا کند، حتی اگر آن راه با خواستههای خانواده متفاوت باشد.
دوستداشتن، همیشه نگهداشتن نیست؛ گاهی آزادگذاشتن است...
@SoulofDream✅
در نگاه کنفوسیوس، آموختن فقط جمعکردن اطلاعات نیست؛ تبدیلکردن دانستهها به رفتار است.
اگر دانایی ما در برخورد با دیگران، تصمیمها و عادتهایمان دیده نشود، هنوز به حکمت تبدیل نشده است.
دانشِ واقعی، دیر یا زود خودش را در شیوهی زندگی نشان میدهد...
@SoulofDream✅
مونتنی در کتاب خودشناسی بهجای آنکه انسان را موجودی ساده و قابلپیشبینی بداند، تناقضهایش را جدی گرفت.
ما در یک روز میتوانیم شجاع و ترسو، مهربان و خودخواه، مطمئن و سرگردان باشیم.
خودشناسی یعنی پذیرفتنِ همین پیچیدگی، نه ساختن تصویری بینقص از خود...
@SoulofDream✅
ارسطو فضیلت را نتیجهی یک تصمیمِ بزرگ و ناگهانی نمیدانست.
از نگاه او، آدمی با تکرارِ کارهای کوچک، به چیزی تبدیل میشود.
ما فقط محصول نیتهایمان نیستیم؛ محصول عادتهایی هستیم که هر روز، بیسروصدا تکرارشان میکنیم...
@SoulofDream✅
پاسکال معتقد بود انسان گاهی خود را با سرگرمیهای بیپایان از روبهروشدن با خویش دور میکند.
شلوغی همیشه نشانهی پرمعنابودن زندگی نیست؛ گاهی فقط راهیست برای نشنیدنِ سکوت درون.
آدم از تنهایی نمیترسد؛ از چیزهایی میترسد که در تنهایی دربارهی خودش میفهمد...
@SoulofDream✅
فقدان فقط نبودنِ یک نفر نیست؛ تغییرکردنِ تمام جهانِ اطراف ماست.
بعد از رفتن کسی، همان خیابانها و اتاقها باقی میمانند، اما معنایشان دیگر همان نیست.
دلتنگی گاهی نه برای خودِ آدم، که برای جهانیست که با او داشتیم...
- رولان بارت
@SoulofDream✅
سقراط ارزشِ دانستن را در پذیرفتنِ نادانی میدید.
کسی که مطمئن است همهچیز را میداند، دیگر چیزی یاد نمیگیرد.
اعتراف به «نمیدانم»، شکستِ عقل نیست؛ بازکردنِ درِ آن است...
@SoulofDream✅
ژان پل سارتر بر مسئولیت انتخابهای انسان تأکید میکرد.
حتی وقتی انتخابکردن دشوار است، کنارکشیدن هم بینتیجه نمیماند؛ زیرا تصمیمنگرفتن، اغلب تصمیمی پنهان است.
ما فقط با کارهایی که انجام میدهیم ساخته نمیشویم؛ با کارهایی که از انجامشان چشمپوشی میکنیم نیز ساخته میشویم...
@SoulofDream✅
یونگ باور داشت بخشهایی از شخصیت خود را که نمیپسندیم، به تاریکی ذهن میفرستیم.
اما چیزی که انکار میشود، ناپدید نمیشود؛ فقط پنهانتر و قدرتمندتر عمل میکند.
بلوغ یعنی بتوانیم با بخشهای ناخوشایند خود روبهرو شویم، بدون آنکه تسلیمشان شویم...
@SoulofDream✅
آرتور شوپنهاور زندگی را میدانِ خواستنهای بیپایان میدید: خواستهای برآورده میشود و خواستهای دیگر جای آن را میگیرد.
به همین دلیل، رضایتِ کامل همیشه دستنیافتنی به نظر میرسد.
شاید آرامش از لحظهای بیاید که بفهمیم هر خواستهای، وعدهی خوشبختی نیست...
@SoulofDream✅
❤70👍18💯9
Showing the 12 most recent of 300 posts we hold for @SoulofDream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@SoulofDream edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@SoulofDream named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@samadance named in 2 posts, 14 September 2026 – 15 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MrOrdibeheshti @mrordibeheshti · 38,162 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
Dreaming @Dreaminng · 48,042 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
boufe_koor @boufe_koor_insta · 34,117 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
کافه ریلکس @CafeReIax · 44,783 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
حال خوب @hess_ziba · 91,031 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Freely @Freely · 50,696 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
رادیو چهرازی و ... 🎧📚🎬 @radio_chehraziii · 62,183 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
دیالوگ های ماندگار @tinymoviez · 124,300 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
بايكوت @baycot · 149,657 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Radio Relax @RadioRelax · 327,703 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Sepblog | سپهر خدابنده @Sepblog · 282,981 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
﮼اتاقسردآبی ﮼ @Blue_coldroom · 28,056 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
ایرانگردی | سفر | گردشگری @iranisair · 29,319 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
کافه پاراگراف @cafeparagraph_mag · 61,827 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
صدا و سکوت @SoundSilence · 117,067 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
•| #نرگس_صرافیان_طوفان |• @narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,650 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Love 𝕏 ❤️ @lovephotos · 22,363 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 20 September 2026
EVOL ‘ @Evolmusic · 22,618 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 September 2026
Biijame @biijameart · 34,152 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
| For Story @ForStory · 24,176 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
Mentonix @mentonix · 35,156 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
ته خیار... @tah_khiar · 38,990 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
[ Embrace ] @Embrace · 49,285 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Hαмιd ѕαlιмι @hamid59salimi · 31,840 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Soul of Dream️️” (@SoulofDream), 167,652 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SoulofDream.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.