Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,747. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 96,239–98,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:19
96,501
-31
16 Sept 2026, 13:37
96,532
-76
14 Sept 2026, 15:40
96,608
-49
13 Sept 2026, 02:41
96,657
-76
11 Sept 2026, 00:59
96,733
-106
8 Sept 2026, 01:18
96,839
-97
4 Sept 2026, 21:37
96,936
-75
3 Sept 2026, 08:12
97,011
-25
2 Sept 2026, 00:03
97,036
-35
31 Aug 2026, 23:38
97,071
-32
30 Aug 2026, 22:24
97,103
-42
30 Aug 2026, 01:46
97,145
-33
29 Aug 2026, 03:02
97,178
-29
28 Aug 2026, 04:34
97,207
-56
27 Aug 2026, 02:54
97,263
-21
26 Aug 2026, 04:38
97,284
-54
25 Aug 2026, 04:47
97,338
-8
24 Aug 2026, 00:07
97,346
-82
22 Aug 2026, 11:07
97,428
-85
20 Aug 2026, 23:52
97,513
first reading
Engagement
431 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.39%
avg views ÷ 96,501 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,130
248 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
248
of 431 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 248 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
431 (3 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
1,767,470
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 22:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,760
Videos
≈488
Links
≈100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15m 06s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 431 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tak_Mesra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 431 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#Elise_De_Lune
نامه ای که نوشتی هرگز نگرانم نکرد...
گفته ای بعد از این مرا دوست نخواهی داشت!
اما..
نامه ات
چرا انقدر طولانی است؟
تمیز نوشته ایی...
پشت و رو دوازده برگ؛
این خودش یک کتاب کوچک است!
هیچ کس برای خداحافظی
نامه ای چنین نمی نویسد!
نامه ات
نگرانم نکرد...
#هاینریش_هاینه
https://t.me/A_Music_Clubb
https://t.me/Music_is_like_a_life
گاهی آدم دنبال یک آهنگ نیست؛
دنبال چیزیست که حالِ درونش را بفهمد.
اگر موسیقی، فکر و سکوت
برای تو فقط سرگرمی نیست...
شاید اینجا جایی برای تو باشد.
https://t.me/Music_is_like_a_life
میدانی چه چیز را بیشتر در تو دوست دارم؟
زیباییِ ساکت و بردبارت.
تو بار سنگینی روزها را بر شانههایت حمل میکنی
و با این حال غباری بر ظرافت وجودت نیفتادهاست.
• از صفحهی توییتر colonel
با تیشه به کَندنِ خودش مشغول است
مردی که ز کوه بودنش خسته شده
#حسین_اپرا
Signed 𝑭𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒛𝒊
Showing the 12 most recent of 431 posts we hold for @Tak_Mesra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
|مُحَرَّض| @Moharraz_1 · 28,022 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
مینی شعر @minii_shear · 54,792 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
" نیم بیت "️ @nim_beyt · 58,627 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
ژیکان @zhikangraphic · 24,198 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 September 2026
آن؛ @monadchannel · 52,355 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
شعر و ادبیات چامه @chaame · 54,996 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
شعر نو @sheereno · 39,667 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
اشعار کوتاه @textimix · 45,317 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
نـجــــوا @najvashear · 68,713 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Mehryadk @mehryadk · 67,159 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
شعر فارسی @FarsiShear · 69,543 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
نگاران | ادبیات @negaaraan_ac · 33,760 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
آنها @anhaaparat · 65,988 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
•| #نرگس_صرافیان_طوفان |• @narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,650 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
شخص غایب ༄.° @missing158 · 42,998 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
Radio Relax @RadioRelax · 327,703 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
MohsenChavoshi FC @mohsenchavoshifc · 48,415 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
بعد از تو… @AfterYouMyLover · 56,577 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
「𝐌𝐎 𝐒𝐢 𝐓𝐎 」 @Mo_Sitoo · 58,550 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
ابدیت | Eternity @Eternity_Chnl · 61,581 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
بايكوت @baycot · 149,657 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Soul of Dream️️ @SoulofDream · 167,652 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
بارکُد|||| @barcod · 167,209 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
EGHMAA | اغما @eghmaa · 58,437 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تک مصرع” (@Tak_Mesra), 96,501 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tak_Mesra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.