Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥4❤🔥1

Channel
@Drunk_Moon_1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,288subscribers
-554 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001610018410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Drunk_Moon_1 |
| Description | @Navidzk1375 :انتقادات ، پیشنهادات |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Drunk_Moon_1 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:20 | 13,288 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:07 | 13,293 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:57 | 13,298 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:17 | 13,303 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:58 | 13,309 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 13,312 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:28 | 13,319 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:15 | 13,322 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 13,325 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 13,326 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 13,333 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 13,338 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 13,348 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:39 | 13,349 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 13,351 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 13,364 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:44 | 13,373 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 13,383 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:08 | 13,390 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 13,395 | first reading |
96 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 96 (26 July 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,715 |
| Reactions total | 174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 06:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,609 reactions across 95 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 875 | 54.4% | |
| 🔥 | 215 | 13.4% | |
| 😢 | 160 | 9.94% | |
| ❤🔥 | 139 | 8.64% | |
| 💔 | 117 | 7.27% | |
| 👍 | 70 | 4.35% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 0.622% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 0.559% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 0.435% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.435% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,609 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Drunk_Moon_1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 1 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥4❤🔥1
#امید @Drunk_Moon_1
❤4🔥3❤🔥2
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤8🔥1😢1
#علیرضا_پوراستاد @Drunk_Moon_1
❤7🔥1😢1
چقدر ساده به هم ریختی روان مرا بریده غصّه ی دل کندنت امان مرا قبول کن که مخاطب پسند خواهد شد به هر زبان بنویسند داستان مرا گذشتی از من و شب های خالی از غزلم گرفته حسرت دستان تو جهان مرا سریع پیر شدم آنچنانکه آینه نیز شکسته در دل خود صورت جوان مرا به فکر معجزه ای تازه بودم و ناگاه خدا گرفت به دست تو امتحان مرا نه تو خلیل خدایی نه من چو اسماعیل بگیر خنجر و در دم بگیر جان مرا تو را به حرمت عشقت قسم بیا برگرد بیا و…
❤18🔥4😢1
در خیالات خودم در زیر بارانی که نیست می رسم با تو به خانه،از خیابانی که نیست می نشینی روبه رویم خستگی در میکنی چای می ریزم برایت توی فنجانی که نیست باز میخندی و میپرسی که حالت بهتر است؟ باز میخندم که خیلی! گرچه میدانی که نیست شعر میخوانم برایت واژه ها گل می کنند یاس و مریم می گذارم توی گلدانی که نیست چشم می دوزم به چشمت،می شود آیا کمی دست هایم را بگیری بین دستانی که نیست؟ وقت رفتن می شود با بغض می گویم نرو پشت پ…
❤18🔥12💔8
دلبری دارم که در عالم نظیرش کم تر است رخ قمر، بالا صنوبر، لب شکر، تن مرمر است #وفایی_مهابادی @Drunk_Moon_1
🔥14❤8
تابه ی جهیزمون یادت میاد؟ با وفاتر از تو بود سوخت با آتش فقری که مرا میسوزاند ساخت با چربی و چرک هفته و هفت نیمرو! دسته اش آب شد و رنگش رفت! بگذریم.... بگذریم از گذر آن همه رویاهایش! حسرت دیدن فر؛ پختن پیتزاهایش! گاه گاهی از سر بی تابی؛ گریه میکرد ولی تابانه! آتش فقر مرا میبوسید! همزمان با دل من میپوسید! دل من! تابه ی رویاهایم #حسین_پناهی @Drunk_Moon_1
🔥11❤9💔2
نیل طغیان کرد وموسی هم عصا گم کرده است فصلِ طاعون بوعلی سینا شفا گم کرده است هرچه سوی آسمان ها دست بردیم هیچ بود! یا زمین دوراست یا ما را خدا گم کرده است پس کدام آیین در آخر حقیقت بوده است؟ هرکسی خود را به یک راهی جدا گم کرده است هرکسی اندازه ی وسعش به دل دارد زیان بینوا جانش ولی دارا طلا گم کرده است آه آزادی کجایی پس، که فریاد از قفس مرغِ ما از سمت هربالی هوا گمکرده است نوش دارویی برای این همه سهراب نیست؟ یا ک…
❤9🔥2👍1👏1
گريه و چای و غم و شعر و دو نخ بهمن و بعد باز هم گريه و … يک دور دگر مصرع قبل #كيانوش_سفری #عکس_نوشته @Drunk_Moon_1
😢12👏3🔥3❤1
یارِ بارافتاده را در کاروان بگذاشتند بیوفا یاران که بربستند بار خویش را #سعدی @Drunk_Moon_1
❤5👌2
در مجلس ترحیمم اگر تار و دف آورد یا جای گلایل سر قبرم علف آورد منعش نکنید این جگر آزرده ی طناز یک عمر به این شیوه دلم را به کف آورد با رفتنش از ذوق مرا دائما انداخت با آمدنش یکسره شور و شعف آورد پیغامبری ساخته بود از منو یک روز ایمان به غزلهای من بی شرف آورد نفرین به مشامی که مرا یاد ندارد نفرین به نسیمی که مرا بی هدف آورد نفرین به همین رود که برد آن طرف او را نفرین به عصایی که مرا این طرف آورد #لاادری @Drunk_…
❤16😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @Drunk_Moon_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@Drunk_Moon_1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @Drunk_Moon_1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ماه مست” (@Drunk_Moon_1), 13,288 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Drunk_Moon_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.