روان تحلیل، فضایی برای شناخت بهتر، درک عمیقتر و شفای زخم های جان، تا زندگی پویا در همه ابعاد را تجربه کنیم. بصورت متمرکز بر روی روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ و رواندرمانی اگزیستانسیال فعالیت میکنیم.
www.ravantahlil.com
Admin: @BardiaBEH
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
40 measurements spanning 93 days, net +811. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,222–10,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 01:57
10,155
+11
6 Nov 2026, 03:15
10,144
+4
4 Nov 2026, 23:29
10,140
+9
4 Nov 2026, 00:46
10,131
+6
3 Nov 2026, 03:41
10,125
-1
2 Nov 2026, 01:26
10,126
-7
31 Oct 2026, 23:40
10,133
-1
30 Oct 2026, 23:49
10,134
+2
30 Oct 2026, 02:37
10,132
+5
29 Oct 2026, 02:51
10,127
-2
28 Oct 2026, 04:06
10,129
-3
27 Oct 2026, 03:36
10,132
+1
26 Oct 2026, 04:39
10,131
+8
25 Oct 2026, 01:47
10,123
+10
23 Oct 2026, 22:09
10,113
+31
22 Oct 2026, 22:19
10,082
+35
21 Oct 2026, 19:30
10,047
+20
20 Oct 2026, 15:16
10,027
+8
19 Oct 2026, 17:16
10,019
-2
18 Oct 2026, 16:57
10,021
first reading
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.18%
avg views ÷ 10,155 subscribers
Avg views / post
729
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
131 (28 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
24,067
Reactions total
278
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,800
Videos
≈422
Links
≈7,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
1m 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,070 reactions across 107 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
742
69.3%
👍
315
29.4%
🔥
7
0.654%
🙏
5
0.467%
👎
1
0.093%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«آدمیان بهدرستی درنمییابند که با نپذیرفتنِ آنچه زندگی پیش رویشان مینهد — یعنی همان پرسشها و وظایفی که زندگی بر عهدهشان میگذارد — تا چه اندازه خود را در معرض خطر قرار میدهند. اگر ما تقدیرِ خویش را نپذیریم، نوعِ دیگری از رنج جایگزین آن میشود: عصبیت (نوروز) پدید میآید؛ و من بر این باورم که آن زندگی که ناگزیر به زیستناش هستیم، به بدیِ یک عصبیت نیست. اگر بناست رنجی بکشم، بگذار این رنج برخاسته از واقعیتِ وجودم …
ایونت روان تحلیل
حضوری و آنلاین
رایگان
جمعه
15 آبان
ساعت ۱۵:۳۰ الی ۱۷
موضوع:
یافتن معنا
روانشناسی گزیستانسیال برای ساختن زندگی معنادار در زمانه پوچ
مدرس:محمد مهدی کهربی
۰۹۱۲۱۷۹۵۷۳۹
بهبودیان
(جهت شرکت راس ساعت در مجموعه حضور داشته باشید و یا از طریق لینک راس ساعت وارد ایونت شوید.)
لینک شرکت در ایونت به صورت آنلاین در کانال تلگرام و بله روان تحلیل و استوری همین پیج
https://meet.google.com/eam-oojs-upr
آد…
«کسانی که به خودانتقادیِ [افراطی] دچارند، زندگی خود را محدود میکنند؛ چرا که بیم دارند با پذیرش ریسکهای رفتاری، در معرض تجربیات دردناکی قرار گیرند که تنها مُهری بر تأیید انتقادهایشان باشد.
آنان بر این باورند که اگر بخت خود را بیازمایند و به دنبال روابط عاطفیِ مطلوب بروند، با طردشدنی دردناک روبهرو خواهند شد و جایگاهشان بهعنوان فردی «جذابیتناپذیر» و «فرودست» دگرباره اثبات میگردد... اگر برای شغلی درخواست دهند، جوی…
اگر قرار باشد اتحادی میان اضدادی چون روح و ماده، خودآگاه و ناخودآگاه، روشن و تاریک و امثال آن شکل بگیرد، این امر در قالب پدیدهای سوم رخ خواهد داد که نه نشانهٔ یک مصالحه و سازش، بلکه نمایانگر چیزی نو است.
— کارل یونگ
📍@ravantahlil | گروه آموزشی روان تحلیل 📚
تقریباً پیشداوری گزافی است که بپنداریم هستی صرفاً میتواند جنبهای مادی داشته باشد. در واقع، تنها شکل هستی که از آن دانشی بیواسطه داریم، روان است.
— کارل گووستاو یونگ، «استقلال ناخودآگاه»، مجموعه آثار، جلد ۱۱، بند ۱۶
چند بار با شتابزدگی به سوی راهحلهای نهایی جهیدهایم، بدون آنکه مکثی کنیم تا زیروبمهای روحنواز آن را بچشیم، و از این طریق فرصتی برای کار بر روی جان خویش را از دست دادهایم؟ ما جامعهای عمیقاً نتیجهگرا هستیم که برای اقدام کردن و پایان دادن به تنش بیقراری میکنیم؛ و از این رو، فرصتهای شناخت خویش را از طریق انگیزهها و رازهایمان بر باد میدهیم.
— توماس مور، مراقبت از روح
«در حال حاضر، ما افراد را تنها تا آن مرحلهای آموزش میدهیم که تواناییِ کسب معاش و ازدواج را بهدست آورند؛ پس از آن، گویی سازوبرگ ذهنیِ کاملی فراهم آمده باشد، آموزش بهکلی متوقف میشود. از اینرو، شمارِ عظیمی از زنان و مردان، تمامِ عمر خویش را در بیخبریِ مطلق از مهمترین مسائل سپری میکنند.»
— کارل یونگ
📍@ravantahlil | گروه آموزشی روان تحلیل 📚
راه سوم («معنویت انتقادی»): یونگ راهی میان ظاهرگرایی دینی (ایمان به گزارههای لفظی و تاریخی) و خداناباوری (رد کامل ارزش دین) پیشنهاد میکند. او با ترکیب جنبههای معنوی دین و پرسشگریِ نقدآمیز الحاد، مفهوم «معنویت انتقادی» (Critical Spirituality) را مطرح میسازد که در آن گزارههای دینی نه حقایق فیزیکی، بلکه استعارهها و نمادهایی در خدمت روان انسان هستند.
واقعیت روانی در برابر واقعیت فیزیکی: خطای اصلی ظاهرگرایان و خدا…
#پادکست روان تحلیل
010 - راه سوم یونگ بین دین و خداناباوری
بررسی دیدگاههای کارل یونگ درباره دین و اسطوره که آموزههای مسیحی نباید به صورت حرفی و مادی تفسیر شوند، بلکه باید آنها را به عنوان نمادها و استعارههایی برای تجربیات روونی در نظر گرفت. چگونه دین تاریخی مسیحیت به دلیل تکیه بیش از حد بر واقعیتهای فیزیکی و تاریخی، با خرد و منطق مدرن دچار تعارض شده است. با این حال، از دیدگاه یونگ و متون مقدس اولیه مانند نوش…
«شیطان، برآیندِ تمامیِ تاریکیهای طبیعتِ انسان است. آن که در نور میزید، در تکاپو است تا تصویری از خدا باشد و آن که در تاریکی روزگار میگذراند، میکوشد تا به هیئتِ شیطان درآید. از آنجا که من سودای زیستن در نور را داشتم، هنگامی که اعماق را لمس کردم، خورشید برایم خاموش شد. آن اعماق، تاریک و مارگونه بود. من با آن متحد شدم و بر آن چیرگی نیافتم؛ بلکه با پذیرفتن طبیعتِ مار، سهم خویش را از خواری و تسلیم بر دوش کشیدم. اگر هم…
❤4👍4
Signed Mohammad Kahrobi
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @ravantahlil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ravantahlil edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @ravantahlil as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بنیاد فرهنگ زندگی ـ سهیل رضایی @bonyadfarhangzendegi · 37,156 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @Spirit_and_life · 40,490 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
vkends | مجله ایدهها @vkends · 24,562 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
روانشناسی آرامش ذهن @Arameshzehn44 · 49,354 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
فلسفه اگزیستانسیالیسم و روانکاوی @phenomenology_existentialism · 19,496 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
پرسونا @psychology_personaa · 20,721 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
کافه کتاب @kettab · 21,398 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
نشر میلکان | Milkan @nashremilkan · 32,083 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
| پادکست فارسی انسانک | @ensanak · 31,387 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
کتابخانه ی روانشناسی @bookpsychology · 19,295 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی @psyshortmovies · 34,658 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
زندگی سالم (سوده هروی) روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @zendeegiesaleem · 156,575 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Instrumentallist (موزیک لایت) @instrumentallist · 30,987 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
کتابدونی @ketabdooni · 149,697 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
دکتر الهام محمدی @dr_e_mohammadi · 21,824 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
موسیقی و آرامش️ @shivana_music · 20,397 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 September 2026
کتابخانه نواندیشان @Noandishaan_Book · 36,011 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
کتاب نایاب @ketabnayyab · 89,747 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
Visa Mondial | ویزا موندیال @visamondial · 25,867 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 September 2026
Dr Sargolzaee podcast @drsargolzaeipodcast · 23,722 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
کارگاههای آسیب شناسی dsm5 @psychologyservice · 21,785 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 September 2026
یــــــاد ایـــــام @yadeh_ayam · 42,283 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 August 2026
کافه اشنو @caffeeshno · 33,775 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
📚 کتابخانه نایاب عرفانی نور 📚 @book_noor · 44,583 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روان تحلیل” (@ravantahlil), 10,155 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ravantahlil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.