معرفی کتاب در حوزه های علوم تجربی،انسانی،اجتماعی، تکامل(فرگشت)،مغز و علوم اعصاب، آگاهی،خطاهای شناختی و ادراکی، اقتصاد رفتاری،تفکر نقادانه،ادبیات و رمان..و فایلهای
از دکتر مکری،مقالات و گزیده کتاب صوتی
https://t.me/+yQluACuhZRA2NjBk
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 91 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,466–10,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 21:31
10,494
-4
4 Nov 2026, 23:16
10,498
-3
4 Nov 2026, 00:45
10,501
+1
3 Nov 2026, 03:21
10,500
+5
2 Nov 2026, 06:11
10,495
+7
1 Nov 2026, 08:17
10,488
-1
31 Oct 2026, 08:28
10,489
-2
30 Oct 2026, 06:46
10,491
-12
29 Oct 2026, 10:00
10,503
-12
28 Oct 2026, 08:28
10,515
-6
27 Oct 2026, 08:16
10,521
-1
26 Oct 2026, 06:29
10,522
-2
25 Oct 2026, 06:34
10,524
-8
24 Oct 2026, 08:55
10,532
+3
22 Oct 2026, 07:20
10,529
-2
19 Oct 2026, 22:15
10,531
-2
18 Oct 2026, 19:19
10,533
-3
17 Oct 2026, 21:38
10,536
+4
16 Oct 2026, 23:07
10,532
+4
15 Oct 2026, 23:20
10,528
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.39%
avg views ÷ 10,494 subscribers
Avg views / post
461
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
54 (26 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
9,685
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,000
Videos
≈227
Links
≈2,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 06m
Average length
25m 12s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ما معمولاً زندگی را با چند ایستگاه اصلی تعریف میکنیم: تولد، بلوغ، ازدواج و مرگ.
اما هزاران سال در تاریخ بشر، یک ایستگاه دیگر هم وسط این خط وجود داشت؛ طوری که چرخهٔ طبیعی زندگی برای بخش بزرگی از انسانها «تولد، آبله، بلوغ و مرگ» بود.
بیماری ترسناکی که بیرون از زندگی روزمره نبود، بلکه خودِ زندگی روزمره، ازدواج، زیبایی، بازار کار و حتی تصمیم برای فرستادن بچهها به مدرسه را شکل میداد.
آبله خانواده را در برابر یک تضاد…
در این سخنرانی از رویداد "TELSI SCIENCE TALK 21" با موضوع "ژن خودخواه، انسان فداکار!" آذرخش مکری، روانپزشک و عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران، با عنوان "وقتی دیگری سود میبرد" به بررسی یکی از پیچیدهترین جنبههای روانشناسی اجتماعی انسان میپردازد.
ایشان با مرور پژوهشهای علمی و ارائه مثالهایی از روابط انسانی، محیطهای کاری و تعاملات اقتصادی، مفاهیمی همچون برابریخواهی، ذهنیت حاصلجمع صفر، ذهنیت ضد سود و ریش…
بخشی از سخنرانی آذرخش مکری در رویداد "TELSI SCIENCE TALK 21" با موضوع "ژن خودخواه، انسان فداکار!" ، با عنوان "وقتی دیگری سود میبرد" به بررسی یکی از پیچیدهترین جنبههای روانشناسی اجتماعی انسان میپردازد.
🌐 لقمه (سه)
⭕️ خوابهای پیشگویانه 😴
🔸 تجربهٔ شهودی ما میگوید برخی خوابها «آینده» را دقیقاً دیدهاند اما در روششناسی علمی، شدتِ یقینِ فردی هیچ اعتباری ندارد.
🔸 آنچه ما «خواب پیشگویانه» مینامیم، غالباً محصول تلاقیِ سه سازوکار دقیقِ عصبشناختی است...
▫️ در این اپیزودِ کوتاه به پشت صحنهٔ مغز میرویم تا ببینیم چگونه این شعبدهٔ واقعگرایانه را کارگردانی میکند.
💬 نوشتار و خوانش: فرهاد ارکانی
🙏🏻 حمایت از این کانال…
فهرست مطالب معرفی کتاب وقتی همه میدانند که همه میدانند
۱- معرفی کتاب وقتی همه میدانند که همه میدانند
۲- کتاب وقتی همه میدانند که همه میدانند درباره چیست؟
۳- دانش مشترک چیست و چرا «همه میدانند» کافی نیست؟
۴- چرا یک جمله ساده میتواند همهچیز را تغییر دهد؟
۵- چرا انسانها اینهمه به فکر دیگران درباره خودشان فکر میکنند؟
۶- روابط انسانی؛ وقتی باید هر دو بدانیم «ما چه نسبتی با هم داریم»
۷- چرا منظورمان را مس…
پول چرا پول است؟
🔹یک تکه کاغذ به خودی خود ارزش چندانی ندارد. با این حال، آن را به فروشنده میدهید و در مقابل غذا، لباس یا خدمات دریافت میکنید. چرا؟ فقط به این دلیل که شما معتقدید پول ارزش دارد؟ نه. مهمتر این است که میدانید دیگران نیز آن را خواهند پذیرفت و آنها نیز میدانند دیگران خواهند پذیرفت. پول نمونهای تقریباً کامل از قدرت هماهنگی است.
🔹همین منطق درباره بسیاری از عرفهایی صدق میکند که آنقدر به آنها عادت ک…
بازتاب جهانی کتاب وقتی همه میدانند که همه میدانند
🔹کتاب When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows در سال ۲۰۲۵ منتشر شد و از همان سال انتشار در چند فهرست مهم بهترین کتابهای سال قرار گرفت. The Economist آن را در میان بهترین کتابهای ۲۰۲۵ قرار داده، Bloomberg آن را در فهرست کتابهای مورد توجه رهبران کسبوکار آورده و آمازون نیز آن را در میان بهترین کتابهای کسبوکار و رهبری سال انتخاب کرده است.
🔹بازتابهای کتاب نیز گس…
چه چیزی وقتی همه میدانند که همه میدانند را از دیگر کتابهای پینکر متمایز میکند؟
🔹بعضی کتابهای پینکر دامنهای عظیم دارند. در فرشتگان بهتر ذات ما تاریخ خشونت را در مقیاسی چندصدساله دنبال میکند؛ در عقلانیت سراغ ابزارهای فکر کردن میرود و در آثارش درباره زبان، ذهن و شناخت به سازوکارهای بنیادین انسان میپردازد.
🔹این کتاب از یک ایده بسیار محدودتر شروع میکند. اما درست مانند انداختن سنگی کوچک در آب، دایرههای آن پیوس…
چرا دعواهای ما بیشتر شبیه جنگاند تا جستوجوی حقیقت؟
🔹اگر هدف یک بحث پیدا کردن حقیقت است، چرا اینهمه وقت صرف شکست دادن طرف مقابل میکنیم؟ چرا میگوییم: «استدلالش را نابود کردم.»، «از موضعش دفاع کرد.»، «نقطه ضعفش را هدف گرفتم.»، «جواب محکمی به حملهاش دادم.»، زبان ما بحث را شبیه جنگ میکند.
🔹پینکر در بخشی جذاب از کتاب، به امکان دیگری فکر میکند: اگر مباحثه را نه جنگ، بلکه رقص ببینیم چه؟ در رقص، هدف این نیست که یکی …
چرا گاهی سکوت از صراحت عاقلانهتر است؟
🔹ما معمولاً «صداقت کامل» را فضیلت میدانیم. اما آیا واقعاً باید هرچه در ذهنمان میگذرد به زبان بیاوریم؟ اگر از همکارمان دلخوریم، باید تمام افکارمان را بگوییم؟ اگر از رئیس خود بدمان میآید، آیا اعلام صریح آن بهترین انتخاب است؟ اگر در رابطهای متوجه ضعفی کوچک شدهایم، آیا موظفیم هر بار آن را به موضوع گفتوگو تبدیل کنیم؟
🔹فصل پایانی کتاب عنوانی عمداً تحریککننده دارد: «صداقت افرا…
چرا گاهی سکوت از صراحت عاقلانهتر است؟
🔹ما معمولاً «صداقت کامل» را فضیلت میدانیم. اما آیا واقعاً باید هرچه در ذهنمان میگذرد به زبان بیاوریم؟ اگر از همکارمان دلخوریم، باید تمام افکارمان را بگوییم؟ اگر از رئیس خود بدمان میآید، آیا اعلام صریح آن بهترین انتخاب است؟ اگر در رابطهای متوجه ضعفی کوچک شدهایم، آیا موظفیم هر بار آن را به موضوع گفتوگو تبدیل کنیم؟
🔹فصل پایانی کتاب عنوانی عمداً تحریککننده دارد: «صداقت افرا…
Signed Sara
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @ketaabsaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ketaabsaar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ketaabsaar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ktaabsaar named in 25 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند @homosapiensfa · 44,335 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
Absurd Mind's Media @absurdmindsmedia · 30,598 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی @psyshortmovies · 34,635 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
کتابخانه فراسوی دانش @Farasoyedaneshlib · 19,478 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
انبارستان🎧 @anbar100 · 29,514 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei @drsargolzaei · 35,628 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری @DrAzarakhshMokri · 202,959 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
کتابهای کمیاب و نایاب @freeforbiddenbooks · 46,517 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری) @FarazTed · 21,095 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
دانش، آگاهی @daneshagahi · 28,689 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
برترین کتابها @bartarinbookk · 33,138 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
بوقت چای @TimeChay · 56,601 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor @PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,145 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
کتابهای ممنوعه @ketab_mamnouee · 79,712 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
دیالکتیک علمی @ScientificDialectics · 23,682 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری | آرشیو @Dr_Azarakhsh_Mokri_Public_Files · 22,930 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
یافتههای نوین روانشناختی @Hrman11 · 24,020 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @Spirit_and_life · 40,149 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Sherwin Vakili (شروین وکیلی) @sherwin_vakili · 22,232 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Science Magazine @science_magazine · 23,008 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
vkends | مجله ایدهها @vkends · 24,559 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
کتابخانه پارس @parsslibrary · 33,539 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی @zistboommedia · 32,679 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی تخصصی @Psychological_Tools · 45,372 Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کتابسار” (@ketaabsaar), 10,494 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketaabsaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.