Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کتابخانه فراسوی دانش

Channel

کتابخانه فراسوی دانش

@Farasoyedaneshlib

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,195subscribers

+160 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001170185834
TypeChannel
Username@Farasoyedaneshlib
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Farasoyedaneshlib

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

919,1959,6026 August 2026 — 19,035 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,035 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,031 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,035 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,051 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,040 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,032 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,035 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,028 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,020 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,021 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,012 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,015 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,016 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,007 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,001 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,992 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,989 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,985 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,988 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,981 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,970 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,959 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,965 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,964 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,967 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,970 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9 subscribers18 September 2026 — 19,195 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net +160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:3719,195+19,186
10 Sept 2026, 02:569-18,961
6 Sept 2026, 22:5918,970+3
4 Sept 2026, 07:5718,967+3
2 Sept 2026, 17:5618,964-1
1 Sept 2026, 13:5718,965+6
31 Aug 2026, 13:5818,959-11
30 Aug 2026, 10:3518,970-11
28 Aug 2026, 10:1618,981-7
27 Aug 2026, 10:4618,988+3
26 Aug 2026, 13:3918,985-4
25 Aug 2026, 14:2918,989-3
24 Aug 2026, 17:2518,992-9
23 Aug 2026, 05:1719,001-6
21 Aug 2026, 14:0519,007-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:2619,016+1
19 Aug 2026, 17:2219,015+3
18 Aug 2026, 15:5219,012-9
17 Aug 2026, 12:4719,021+1
16 Aug 2026, 02:1619,020first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.97%
avg views ÷ 19,195 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held25 (18 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total1,530
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,793 reactions across 25 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,44080.3%
👍18410.3%
🔥1448.03%
👎251.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC≈1,530 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اگر از من بین سه هوش مصنوعی جمینای، کلاد و جی پی تی بپرسید در طول دو سال گذشته نظرات مختلفی داشتم. به نظرم هر کدام برای مواردی خوب هستن. اما در یک کلیت، کلاد از نظر پاسخ منطقی و واقع‌بینانه قطعا از آن دو بالاتر هست. این که خیلی مورد اقبال قرار نگرفته دقیقا به خاطر همین دور بودنش از پاسخ‌های عامیانه مثل جی پی تی هست. هرچند قبول دارم کمی در زبان علمی این مدل قضاوت عجیبه.

65👍11🔥3

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

23 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC≈2,360 views67 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ZangeEghtesad_DrMirhelli

بنجامین گراهام از بزرگترین اقتصاددانان تاریخ، نویسنده کتاب سرمایه‌گذار هوشمند و استاد وارن بافت: هیچ‌کس از آینده بازار مطلع نیست. پس ما به دنبال پیش‌بینی آینده نیستیم ما براساس رفتار کنونی بازار عمل می‌کنیم. مقایسه کنین با افاضات تحلیل‌گران اینستاگرامی

59👍6🔥2

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

21 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC≈3,580 views109 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

چیزی که این دادگاه‌ها الان مطرح کردن رو خیلی وقت پیش بارها داد زده بودم. اینستاگرام جنایت علیه تمرکز و وقت بشریت بود!

78👍28👎3

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

10 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈4,980 views239 reactionsread 3 September 2026

عامل و انگیزه ورود من به این حوزه‌ی کاری دکتر فوده بود. به واسطه نسبت خویشاوندی خاطرات زیادی از کودکی از ایشان دارم. حق بزرگی به گردن من و خانواده داشت. در خاندان ما ایشان تصویری بت‌گونه داشت. به واسطه‌ی کارهای خیر و خدماتی که چه به تمام خویشاوندان داشت و چه به مردم عادی. کارهای خیری که بخشی را به هیچ‌کس بازگو نکرد. زمانی که بیمارستان آزادی تهران را تأسیس کرد تا همین اواخر بسیاری از بیماران روان را رایگان ویزیت و درم

239

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

10 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC≈4,930 views220 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

با نهایت تأسف و اندوه، درگذشت استاد گرانقدر و روانپزشک برجسته، جناب آقای دکتر حسین فوده را تسلیت عرض می‌کنم. پزشک حاذق و دلسوزیی که نقش بسزایی در درمان و آرامش بیمارانشان داشتند. در دورانی که افتخار همکاری با این استاد عزیز را داشتم، درس‌های فراوانی از ایشان آموختم. بسیاری از دانش‌آموزان و دانشجویان ما زیر نظر استاد مسیر بهبودی را طی کردند و امروز با دریغ و اندوه فراوان، از نعمت وجود پرمهرشان محروم شده‌ایم. روحشان شا

214👍5👎1

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

5 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC≈5,000 views81 reactionsread 3 September 2026

یکی از صفحات کتاب اشاره به این می‌کنه که فردی به نام تام کوشران که حالا شما می‌تونید این فرد رو برید در اینترنتم در موردش جستجو کنید وقتی که داشت کار می‌کرد متوجه شد که به صورت روزانه صرفاً چک کردن ایمیل‌ها یک ساعت و نیم وقتش رو می‌گیره و بعد اینو روی چند تا شرکت هم بررسی کرد و متوجه شد اتفاقات عجیبی داره توی این شرکت ها رخ می‌ده تام کوشران صرفا با حذف همین چک کردن پیام‌ها اومد محاسبه کرد که میتونه یک شرکت کوچک راه ا

69🔥7👍5

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

5 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC≈4,300 views81 reactionsread 3 September 2026

حقیقت تکان دهنده‌ای که در این کتاب بهش اشاره میکنه در مورد بحث اجتماعی شدنه. یعنی زیاد اجتماعی شدن، زیاد در رسانه بودن، زیاد در فضاهایی که من اصلاً هیچ وقت در تمام طول دوران کاریم خودم نپسندیدم مثل اینستاگرام این‌ها مانع کار عمیق میشه یعنی بیش از حد قرار گرفتن در معرض این رسانه ها اجازه نمیده شما بتونید به یه کار عمیق بپردازید و در پس اون کار عمیق بتونید یادگیری مفاهیم پیچیده و کارهای پیچیده و سودمند رو انجام بدید یع

👍5620🔥5

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

5 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC≈3,980 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026

توییتر برای معتادان رسانه مثل کراک است!

48👍18👎6

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

5 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈4,200 views83 reactionsread 3 September 2026

دو تا نکته خیلی جالب دیگه‌ای که اشاره می‌کنه یکی این است که شما در مورد اول یعنی اینکه بلد باشید از فناوری‌ها و تکنولوژی به صورت خلاقانه و هوشمند استفاده بکنید دو تا موضوع مطرح می‌کنه یکی اینکه این فناوری‌ها ساده نیستند یعنی میگه کسانی که اومدن و کارهای بزرگ انجام دادن و میلیاردر شدن کسانی بودن که بلد بودن با فناوری های پیچیده خیلی خوب کار بکنن حالا یه چپتری باز می‌کنه یه فصلی باز میکنه میگه یاد گرفتن فناوری‌های پیچی

71👍10🔥2

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

5 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC≈3,290 views83 reactionsread 3 September 2026

آینده و موفقیت کاری نصیب سه دسته می‌شود؛ ۱- کسانی که خلاقانه با دستگاه‌های هوشمند و دیجیتال کار می‌کنند ۲- کسانی که در زمینه کاری خود ستاره‌ هستند ۳- کسانی که به سرمایه دسترسی دارند

76🔥4👎3

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

5 Aug 2026, 03:21 UTC≈3,310 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

برای بار چندم می‌خونمش

54👍17🔥4

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

5 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC≈2,880 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

تو جاده بیکار بودم داشتم کتاب‌های صوتی فیدیبو رو می‌دیدم بعضی عناوین جالب بود

42👎1

Signed Dr Amir Mirhelli

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Farasoyedaneshlib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Farasoyedaneshlib edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند
@homosapiensfa · 43,914
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
PDF book
@PDFbo0ok · 114,790
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
علاقمندان به «دکتر آذرخش مکری»
@azarakhsh_mokrii · 24,314
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
کتابخانه 🔊
@bo0ok_lovers · 202,654
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
کتابخانه دانشگاهی
@Academic_Library · 144,513
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Englishturbo آموزش رایگان زبان با انگلیش توربو
@englishturbo · 53,393
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
دکتر امیر میرهلی_کنکور
@Amirmirhelli · 25,064
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کتابخانه فراسوی دانش” (@Farasoyedaneshlib), 19,195 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Farasoyedaneshlib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.