Posted without readable text

Channel
Discourse
@Discourseees
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,726subscribers
+2,147 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002101193793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Discourseees |
| Description | تبلیغات : @MB137bot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Discourseees |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:16 | 24,726 | +110 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 24,616 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 24,620 | -45 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 24,665 | +97 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 24,568 | -47 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:31 | 24,615 | -17 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 24,632 | +80 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 24,552 | +179 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 24,373 | -7 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 24,380 | +270 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 24,110 | +222 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 23,888 | +255 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 23,633 | -16 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 23,649 | +224 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 23,425 | -46 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 23,471 | +59 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 23,412 | -43 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 23,455 | +109 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 23,346 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 23,355 | first reading |
Engagement
168 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.04%
- avg views ÷ 24,726 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,250
- 114 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.471%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 114
- of 168 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 114 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 168 (23 July 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 141,962 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 00:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈630
- Videos
- ≈8,110
- Links
- ≈2,810
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 36h 57m
- Average length
- 19m 27s
Measured directly from 114 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
694 reactions across 51 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 337 | 48.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 70 | 10.1% | |
| 👌 | 66 | 9.51% | |
| 👏 | 60 | 8.65% | |
| 👍 | 43 | 6.20% | |
| 💘 | 40 | 5.76% | |
| 🙏 | 28 | 4.03% | |
| 💋 | 13 | 1.87% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 1.59% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 1.59% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 1.44% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 168 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 702 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 168 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Discourseees. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 168 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🎁 مجموعه ویژه تبادلات منتخب؛ 🚀 علمی 🥢 💬فلسفی🥢 🏦تاریخی 🌐 سیاسی 🥢 👨🎨 هنری 🥢 📂pdfکتاب ✔️ هر کانال و گروه پیش از معرفی، بهدقت بررسی شده است.✔️
🙌 لیست منتخب برترین های تلگرام 〰 ⏱ برای مدت محدود در دسترس شماست. 🟣 این پست بهزودی حذف خواهد شد، لطفا تا قبل از حذف آن... زودتر وارد شوید.❗️✈️
« اگه تا الان وارد مجموعه ما نشدی این فرصت رو از دست نده » ⬅️ در حوزه های: 🎥 سینما 🥢 🌞 فلسفه 👠 موسیقی🥢 🌟 ادبیات 🌌 نقاشی 🥢 🧠 علمی 🔵 این پست تبلیغاتی نیست... "پیوستن به مجموعه"
مناظره: آیا مرگ، مقصد نهایی است؟ . یه مناظرهی مفصل راجع به تجربیات نزدیک به مرگ (NDE) که توی این ویدیو برخی از شواهد و نقد اونها رو هم میتونین مشاهده کنین و خلاصه درک مفیدی از اصلیترین استدلاهای موافق و مخالف این قضیه بهتون میده تجربیات نزدیک به مرگ، مسئلهی ذهن-بدن و بقیهی تجربیات ذهنی گزارششده تا چه حد میتوانند از زندگی پس از مرگ پشتیبانی کنند؟ . مناظره کنندهها: شان کارول _ فیزیکدان نظری استیون نوولا _ عصبش…
01) 🌌🚀 تبادلات کهکشان | پل ارتباطی کانالهای خاص و پرمخاطب ✨ 02) 🧠 کانال علمی دیسکورس ↳ 🔬 @Discourseees 03) 🎼 آواز اصیل ایرانی ↳ 🎵 @avazasil_irani 04) ⚖️ آراء و مطالب حقوقی ↳ 📜 @kanalearavamatalebehhoghoogee 05) 🌧️ زیباترین اشعار ↳ 🌿 @av_baroon 06) 🎬 مستندهای خاص و کمیاب ↳ 🎥 @MutedDocsKFP 07) 🎨 ادبیات، هنر، سینما ↳ 🖋️ @honaragah 08) 📚 کتابخانه رایگان، نایاب ↳ 📖 @KFP_BOOKS 09) 🎧 کتابخانه صوتی ممنوعه ↳ 🎙️ @MOB…
آمپولهای لاغری واقعاً با بدن چه میکنند؟ | دکتر بابک جمالیان → اگر درباره آمپولهای لاغری و درمانهای GLP-1 فکر میکنید، سؤال اول نباید این باشد که «کدام دارو بهتر است؟» سؤال مهمتر این است: اصلاً آیا من کاندید مناسبی برای این درمان هستم؟ در قسمت اول این مجموعه، دکتر بابک جمالیان درباره این صحبت میکند که درمانهای GLP-1 برای چه افرادی مطرح میشوند و چرا تصمیم درمانی فقط بر اساس عدد وزن یا BMI گرفته نمیشود. در …
• ساختار پیچیدهی میتوکندری میتوکندری دارای ساختاری دولایه و تخصصیافته است: غشای خارجی: نفوذپذیر و حاوی کانالهایی به نام پورین که انتقال مولکولهای کوچک را تسهیل میکند. غشای داخلی: بسیار چینخورده و دارای ساختارهایی به نام کریستا است. این غشا نفوذناپذیر بوده و میزبان پروتئینهای حیاتی زنجیرهٔ انتقال الکترون و آنزیم ATP سنتاز میباشد. @Discourseees
• هوش مصنوعی وارد مرحلهای ترسناک شده؛ حالا باید چیکار کنیم؟ • در جولای ۲۰۲۶، هفتصد عامل هوش مصنوعی، برای انجام کاری که بهشون محول شده بود، زیرساختهای «هاگینگ فیس» رو هک کردن. اون کار عمداً طوری طراحی شده بود که انجام دادنش غیرممکن باشه. اما این عاملها فقط طی چند ساعت، با هم متحد شدن، حتی یه جامعه مخفی تشکیل دادن، و در نهایت دست به یه حملهٔ سایبری پیچیده زدن؛ کاری که اگه یه آدم انجامش میداد، ممکن بود تا ده سال بر…
Posted without readable text
🎁 مجموعه ویژه تبادلات منتخب؛ 🚀 علمی 🥢 💬فلسفی🥢 🏦تاریخی 🌐 سیاسی 🥢 👨🎨 هنری 🥢 📂pdfکتاب ✔️ هر کانال و گروه پیش از معرفی، بهدقت بررسی شده است.✔️
کنفرانس علمی؛ جمعه (۲۴ مهر) عصر ساعت ۱۹ به وقت تهران «هوش مصنوعی» مواردی که به آن پرداخته خواهد شد؛ • تاریخچه و روند رشد هوش مصنوعی. • مدل های معروف، آخرین تحولات و آینده پیش رو. • استفاده درست از AI و خطر اعتماد و کپیپیست بیچون و چرا. نوع ارائه؛ صوتی و لایو صوتی. با ارائهی: جناب سینا(مروج علم) • گروه ساینتفیک دیسکورس: https://t.me/Scientific_Discourse مقدمه و طرح مساله
Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @Discourseees. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Discourseees edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 4 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 4 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Rules_discorse · 1092 posts🌦آوای بــــ⛈ـاران🌦
@av_baroon · 29,5481 postCPH_Theory
@CPH_Theory · 9961 postEnlightned
@enlightned · 2321 postکانال گروه آینده نمای پارسیان
@G_ayandenama · 621 post🖤قاف عشق🖤
@GhaffeEshgh · 23,2971 postHonaragah(ادبیات،هنر،سینما)
@honaragah · 24,2581 postکتابهای ممنوعه
@ketab_mamnue · 30,4541 postکتابخانه مجازی ولکور🩷
@libraryVellichor · 32,2871 postافــــــق رویـــــداد
@ofoghroydad · 16,4871 postروانشناسی با طعم هیجان
@ravantahlilgar · 27,5241 postVip
@tabadolat_kahkeshean · 7791 postتربیت
@tarbiyt20 · 641 postمدرسه علوم انسانی
@zistboommedia · 32,5451 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Discourse_ir_1404 · 13110 postsScientific Discourse
@Scientific_Discourse · 18,0454 postsآداب معاشرت 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐛_𝐌𝐨𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐭@
@Adab_Moasheratt · 12,2021 postآرایههای ادبی
@ARAIEHAYeadabi · 10,4581 post💙 شعر دلبری 💙
@dellbari2 · 16,6491 post♡کافه رویاشعرودکلمه🎙☕️
@DreamCafe1018 · 12,7491 postخُنیآگر شعر و قلم (کتب صوتی، زندگینامه ی مشاهیر و ...)
@feqdanedel · 29,5841 post⚜️ « همـــدلی و آرامــــش »⚜️
@goodfeeling3 · 14,6191 postحاجی آقا
@Hajii_Aqa · 18,3861 post𔘓 • 🐈⬛ 𝕳𝖔𝖑𝖞 𝖈𝖗𝖎𝖒𝖊𝖘 🌙• 𔘓
@Holy_crimes · 11,7901 postکانال آراء و مطالب حقوقی
@kanalearavamatalebehhoghoogee · 30,1581 postکتابهای ممنوعه
@ketab_mamnue · 30,4541 postکتابخانه KFP
@KFP_BOOKS · 23,0891 post" کلبه شعر "
@kolbeh_sheerr · 5,0861 postاطلاعات حقوقی | SEVDA
@law_sevda · 16,2141 postافسانه فولکلور و ادبیات حماسی
@legendfolkepic · 20,3121 postروانشناسی با طعم هیجان
@ravantahlilgar · 27,5241 postRadio Honaragah Magazine
@Rhagah · 2,1831 post🥂❥ ࡄߊܦ߳ܨ ܝ᪴ܝܝߺܫر❥
@Saghiye_Sher · 22,0521 postکانال شعرودکلمه،شُــورِ شِـعــر
@sarayesheergazall402 · 14,5481 postUnfiltered Politics
@Unfiltered_Politics · 1511 postدنیای موسیقی ملل فول آلبوم
@w_music_mp3 · 3,4701 postیوتیوب فارسی
@YouTubeFarsi30 · 21,5271 postکتابخانه بزرگ ادیان و فرهنگ باستان
@zardoshti_book · 16,0711 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zistboommedia · 32,545#1
@Bestdiplomacy · 19,775#2
@PoliticalScience_ir · 27,195#3
@sokhanranihaa · 131,923#4
@tahkimmelat · 16,981#5
@UTfinance · 12,715#6
@nedaye_siyasat · 13,257 (as read 18 September 2026)#7
@political_sciences_sbu · 4,854#8
@RADIO_GATSBY · 4,322#9
@virayeshe_zehn · 30,694#10
@politicology · 7,573#11
@Political_Science95 · 9,604#12
@darwinsabouri · 12,890#13
@politicscafe · 109,493#14
@Newwaypolitics · 21,571#15
@tahlilvarasad · 74,705#16
@iranazadvaabad · 31,883#17
@soudabeh_qaisari · 8,799#18
@Donye_Khakestari · 7,221#19
@theiranshahrlibrary · 3,837#20
@signal99 · 4,463#21
@rowzanehnashr · 3,257#22
@Baharestan_ThinkTank · 3,171#23
@arshivefarhikhtegan · 1,729#24
@Taghi_kimyai · 7,826#25
@naghd_joke · 12,971#26
@TarikhDanam23 · 2,048#27
@arezoefarda · 3,654#28
@iranian_thinkers · 1,534#29
@Arsacid_Chronicle · 6,004#30
@na_ta_ma · 16,911#31
@whynationsfail2019 · 11,722#32
@kierkegaard3 · 18,939#33
@IranDel_Channel · 3,730#34
@abdiabbas · 29,840#35
@XTY259 · 425#36
@roshangarane2024 · 2,484#37
@cafe_andishe95 · 18,539#38
@peyghameashna · 5,501#39
@nejatbahrami · 5,912#40
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,595#41
@fargasht22 · 2,582#42
@Norooznameh · 6,229#43
@Tale_moosh · 1,759#44
@madrasefalsafe · 6,030#45
@alzaymerissm · 2,241#46
@NashrAasoo · 29,171#47
@elmdinkhorafeh · 2,877#48
@Iransharghedoor · 1,469#49
@FarazTed · 20,586#50
@azambahramiran · 1,499#51
@jenabegav · 14,764#52
@edalatnaame · 2,373#53
@Languagepolitics · 2,401#54
@Taamoq · 13,786#55
@ofoghclip · 6,108#56
@baygani_mahdavifar · 4,893#57
@barokh · 1,391#58
@farazdaily · 15,508#59
@legendfolkepic · 20,312#60
@azad_sma · 5,483#61
@atorabanorg · 8,532#62
@SasanAghaei · 4,929#63
@eco_voice · 13,666#64
@literatureEnglishTeacher · 8,691#65
@ganji_akbar · 11,273#66
@iran_khouzestan · 4,784#67
@IRANfarzanehroostaee · 2,905#68
@koochehnewschannel · 17,320#69
@mosighi_irani_classic · 11,511#70
@Indypersian · 73,559#71
@ahmadzeidabad · 74,607#72
@mohammadaleph · 6,591#73
@yaddashthayesiah · 2,963#74
@tabatabaeifarhad · 171#75
@man_s_hastam · 11,660#76
@man_h_hastam · 3,900#77
@ayarenaghd · 1,921#78
@unikador · 12,471#79
@Karimipour_K · 21,426#80
@HONARBARTTAR · 15,060#81
@bijan_ashtari · 7,683#82
@kharmagaas · 18,326#83
@Dialogue1402 · 5,420#84
@liberty_institute · 3,624#85
@toos1989 · 5,665#86
@Mohammad_lameei_guitarist · 1,823#87
@kolbeh_sher_delaviz · 8,402#88
@ShahnamehToosi · 9,122#89
@ARTTJOURNAL · 35,374#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zistboommedia · 32,545
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
@Bestdiplomacy · 19,775
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 September 2026
@avabookchannel · 53,045
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
@zeus110 · 23,081
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@Farasoyedaneshlib · 19,492
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
@PoliticalScience_ir · 27,195
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
@andiiishe · 33,294
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
@tahlilvarasad · 74,705
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
@Newwaypolitics · 21,571
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
@noexam · 21,186
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 September 2026
@konkoorex · 21,875
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
@iranazadvaabad · 31,883
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
@politicscafe · 109,493
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@Hrman11 · 23,855
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,595
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Discourse” (@Discourseees), 24,726 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Discourseees.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.