جزئیات جدید از جلسه تصویب تفاهمنامه در شعام و ماجرای علی الاصول! از زبان رئیس سازمان برنامه و بودجه سرلشکر عبداللهی هم در رای گیری شرکت کرد؛ چند نفر مطلع هم در جلسه حضور داشتند سعید جلیلی رای مخالف داد

Channel
اکبر گنجی
@ganji_akbar
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,424subscribers
-125 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001005816243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ganji_akbar |
| Created | 16 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ganji_akbar |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “telegram.me/ganji_akbar” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 11,424 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 11,435 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 11,445 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 11,449 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 11,458 | -8 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 11,466 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 11,473 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:46 | 11,479 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 11,483 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 11,490 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 11,497 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 11,503 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 11,508 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 11,516 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 11,521 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 11,522 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 11,518 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 11,530 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 11,528 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 11,532 | first reading |
Engagement
647 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.06%
- avg views ÷ 11,424 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 350
- 192 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 192
- of 647 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 647 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 67,118 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 58h 01m
- Average length
- 13m 11s
Measured directly from 264 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
👈Danny Haiphong @GeopoliticsDH has conducted an excellent interview with Abby Martin @AbbyMartin and Lowkey @Lowkey0nline on the wars in Iran and Gaza and on Venezuela and Cuba. ✅#Trump_is_the_unmasked_symbol_of_Zionist-imperialist_neoliberalism, pursuing #the_plunder_of_the_worlds_largest_oil_reserves through regime change in Venezuela and Iran. ✅The prolongation of #the_Gaza_genocide was meant to #normalize_protr…
Photo, posted without a caption
بخش سوم: 🎥#ترامپ_نمادِ_سیستمِ_نئولیبرالیسم_صهیونیستی_امپریالیستیِ_بینقاب_است که از طریق تغییر رژیم در ونزوئلا و ایران، #غارت_بزرگترین_ذخایر_نفت_جهان را دنبال میکند: طولانی کردن #نسلکشی_غزه برای #نرمالسازی_جنگهای_طولانی_در_لبنان_و_ایران و... بود👇👇 ✅ ۳ – شواهد کلیدی 🔺۳.۱ عروسی ایران: ۴ کشته از جمله کودک؛ ۵۰ زخمی؛ باران سیاه تهران. 🔺۳.۲ فیلم ابی: انتشار ارتش > نیمی از کشورهای جهان؛ نیروی هوایی > شش کشور بعد؛ صحنه…
بخش دوم: 🎥#ترامپ_نمادِ_سیستمِ_نئولیبرالیسم_صهیونیستی_امپریالیستیِ_بینقاب_است که از طریق تغییر رژیم در ونزوئلا و ایران، #غارت_بزرگترین_ذخایر_نفت_جهان را دنبال میکند: طولانی کردن #نسلکشی_غزه برای #نرمالسازی_جنگهای_طولانی_در_لبنان_و_ایران و... بود👇👇 🔺۱.۱۱ لوکی — دو مدل: مجتمع نظامی–صنعتی تهدید را باد میکند تا پول عمومی به شرکت فراملی برود. مدل ایرانی از کره تا ویتنام و افغانستان و عراق آسیبپذیری آمریکا را خواند…
🎥#ترامپ_نمادِ_سیستمِ_نئولیبرالیسم_صهیونیستی_امپریالیستیِ_بینقاب_است که از طریق تغییر رژیم در ونزوئلا و ایران، #غارت_بزرگترین_ذخایر_نفت_جهان را دنبال میکند: طولانی کردن #نسلکشی_غزه برای #نرمالسازی_جنگهای_طولانی_در_لبنان_و_ایران و... بود👇👇 👈مصاحبه دنی هایفونگ با ابی مارتین (سازندهٔ فیلم «بزرگترین دشمن زمین» که مدتهاست در حال نمایش و گفتوگوی جمعی است) و لوکی ✅ ۱ – ادعاهای اصلی 🔺۱.۱ میزبان: آمریکا همین حالا ا…
🎥#ترامپ_نمادِ_سیستمِ_نئولیبرالیسم_صهیونیستی_امپریالیستیِ_بینقاب_است که از طریق تغییر رژیم در ونزوئلا و ایران، #غارت_بزرگترین_ذخایر_نفت_جهان را دنبال میکند: طولانی کردن #نسلکشی_غزه برای #نرمالسازی_جنگهای_طولانی_در_لبنان_و_ایران و... بود👇👇 👈مصاحبه دنی هایفونگ با ابی مارتین (سازندهٔ فیلم «بزرگترین دشمن زمین» که مدتهاست در حال نمایش و گفتوگوی جمعی است) و لوکی فرسته بعدی
🎥دومعیاری بودن دونالد ترامپ در حجاب زنان آمریکایی👇👇 👈ترامپ بهشدت از فرماندار نیویورک انتقاد کرده که چرا با حجاب در مراسم یک مسجد مسلمانان شرکت کرده است. ✅اما دخترش ایوانکا هر وقت میخواهد دست به یک معامله بسیار بزرگ عربها بزند، با حجاب میرود و آنها را تیغ میزند. ایوانکا در همان اولین سفر دور اول ریاستجمهوری ترامپ عربستان سعودی را ۱۵۰ میلیون دلار برای بنیادش تیغ زد. شوهرش جرد هم چند میلیارد دلار از کشورهای عر…
Photo, posted without a caption
بخش دوم: 🎥#چرا_رسانه_جریان_اصلی_حسن_پایکر_را_شخصیت_اصلی_انتخابات_میاندورهای_کرده_اند؟ چرا لیبرالهای رسانهها و حزب دموکرات در زدن حسن پایکر با راستِ افراطی همراه شدهاند؟ حسن پایکر که از دیرباز سوسیالیستِ ناقد نسلکشی اسرائیل و مخالف جنگهای آمریکا در خاورمیانه بود؟👇👇 ✅ ۳ – شواهد کلیدی 🔺۳.۱ هویت دیرین: سوسیالیست؛ نقد نسلکشی؛ ضدجنگ آمریکا — بدون این چرخه تا اثر انتخاباتی. 🔺۳.۲ از آوریل تا حالا در برابر حداکثر یک…
🎥#چرا_رسانه_جریان_اصلی_حسن_پایکر_را_شخصیت_اصلی_انتخابات_میاندورهای_کرده_اند؟ چرا لیبرالهای رسانهها و حزب دموکرات در زدن حسن پایکر با راستِ افراطی همراه شدهاند؟ حسن پایکر که از دیرباز سوسیالیستِ ناقد نسلکشی اسرائیل و مخالف جنگهای آمریکا در خاورمیانه بود؟👇👇 👈مصاحبه کریستال بال و ساگار انجتی با حسن پایکر ✅ ۱ – ادعاهای اصلی 🔺۱.۱ پرسش اول: چرا او را شخصیت اصلی میاندورهای کردهاند؟ چون جمهوریخواه کارنامه قابل د…
🎥#چرا_رسانه_جریان_اصلی_حسن_پایکر_را_شخصیت_اصلی_انتخابات_میاندورهای_کرده_اند؟ چرا لیبرالهای رسانهها و حزب دموکرات در زدن حسن پایکر با راستِ افراطی همراه شدهاند؟ حسن پایکر که از دیرباز سوسیالیستِ ناقد نسلکشی اسرائیل و مخالف جنگهای آمریکا در خاورمیانه بود؟👇👇 👈مصاحبه کریستال بال و ساگار انجتی با حسن پایکر فرسته بعدی
Showing the 12 most recent of 647 posts we hold for @ganji_akbar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@realdonaldtrump · 15,4867 postsDr Abdul El–Sayed
@AbdulElSayed · 74 postsSecretary of Treasury Scott Bessent
@SecScottBessent · 5,2152 postsZohran Kwame Mamdani
@ZohranKMamdani · 552 postsDanny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش
@citrinowicz · 2551 postDaniel Davis Deep Dive
@DanielLDavis1 · 221 postDuty To Warn 🔉
@duty2warn · 21 postFormer Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇱🇷
@FmrRepMTG · 31 postDanny Haiphong
@GeopoliticsDH · 101 postJack Cocchiarella
@JDCocchiarella · 21 postJ D Vance
@JDVance · 16,1411 postJustin Wolfers
@JustinWolfers · 21 postkrystalball
@krystalball · 71 postlowkey0nline
@lowkey0nline · 41 postMr Global
@MrGlobal2025 · 11 postHakeem Jeffries
@RepJeffries · 411 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 8
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 8
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ganji_akbar named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 20 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hezardastanbehnood · 44,454
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,193
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
@kaleme · 48,418
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
@tahlilvarasad · 71,487
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
@mashrutehwithAmirKhadem · 27,788
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
@mostafamalekian · 65,709
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
@ahmadzeidabad · 74,821
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
@Sedanet · 21,666
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
@MostafaTajzadeh · 42,926
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
@abdiabbas · 30,117
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
@sokhanranihaa · 131,755
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
@I_D_Network · 38,829
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
@ajaiebdonia · 35,853
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
@virayeshe_zehn · 31,149
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
@Discourseees · 23,633
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
@iranazadvaabad · 32,666
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
@sahandiranmehr · 38,294
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
@MousighiGolha · 29,310
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@ghomeishi3 · 33,823
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اکبر گنجی” (@ganji_akbar), 11,424 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ganji_akbar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.