Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اکبر گنجی

Channel

اکبر گنجی

@ganji_akbar

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,209subscribers

-340 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005816243
TypeChannel
Username@ganji_akbar
Created16 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ganji_akbar

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “telegram.me/ganji_akbar” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

11,20911,55911,3845 August 20268 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 95 days, net -340. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,157–11,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 13:3911,209-14
7 Nov 2026, 06:0111,223-3
6 Nov 2026, 03:3611,226-3
5 Nov 2026, 04:5811,229+5
4 Nov 2026, 02:4111,224-7
3 Nov 2026, 00:3811,231-3
2 Nov 2026, 02:5411,234+1
1 Nov 2026, 01:2711,233-9
30 Oct 2026, 22:4411,242-4
29 Oct 2026, 22:1211,246-2
28 Oct 2026, 20:0011,248-1
27 Oct 2026, 18:1011,249-6
25 Oct 2026, 19:0111,255-8
24 Oct 2026, 15:2611,263-7
23 Oct 2026, 15:1011,270-2
22 Oct 2026, 17:4811,272-1
21 Oct 2026, 15:2111,273-4
20 Oct 2026, 12:3911,277-2
19 Oct 2026, 14:4611,279-6
18 Oct 2026, 16:4611,285first reading

Engagement

784 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.64%
avg views ÷ 11,209 subscribers
Avg views / post
520
137 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
137
of 784 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held784 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total71,186
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 08:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
61h 22m
Average length
10m 21s

Measured directly from 356 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 137 posts held from the last 30 days (6.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 08:44 UTC25 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: ترامپِ خودپرست که همهٔ عالم و آدم باید دور او بچرخند، پس از شکست سنگین میان‌دوره‌ای، با خودی‌هایش وارد جنگ خواهد شد و همه را قربانیِ خود خواهد کرد.👇👇 👈تیم دیلون: ✅ او [ترامپ] فقط می‌گوید: «آره، بعضی‌ها باختند. من که نساختم. من که نساختم. من رئیس‌جمهور هستم. خب که چی؟ تو سناتور هستی. تو نمایندهٔ مجلس هستی. من رئیس‌جمهور هستم.» 🔻 و او پیت هگست را ا…

8 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC52 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: ترامپ، فرزندانش و دامادش، همگی دزدِ کثیفِ فاسدِ منفعت‌طلبِ شخصی هستند و حالا ترامپِ خودشیفته باید با کنگرهٔ جدید از دزدی‌های خود و خانواده‌اش به‌طور علنی دفاع کند و وقتی پسرانش زندانی شدند، به ملاقات آن‌ها نخواهد رفت👇👇 👈تیم دیلون، ترامپیستِ سابق و ناقد کنونی او: ✅ حالا دموکرات‌ها واقعاً قدرت واقعی دارند. پس حالا او[ترامپ] می‌تواند کاری را بکند که…

8 Nov 2026, 08:31 UTC46 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: ترامپ، فرزندانش و دامادش، همگی دزدِ کثیفِ فاسدِ منفعت‌طلبِ شخصی هستند و حالا ترامپِ خودشیفته باید با کنگرهٔ جدید از دزدی‌های خود و خانواده‌اش به‌طور علنی دفاع کند و وقتی پسرانش زندانی شدند، به ملاقات آن‌ها نخواهد رفت👇👇 👈تیم دیلون، ترامپیستِ سابق و ناقد کنونی او: فرسته بعدی

8 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC92 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: رؤسای سنا و مجلس نمایندگان بعدی که از دموکرات‌ها هستند، نباید مانند رهبران کنونیِ جمهوری‌خواهان و دموکرات‌ها مواجب‌بگیرِ لابی اسرائیل، خادم اسرائیل و الیگارش‌ها باشند👇👇 👈 جنیفر ولچ: ✅ «حاکیم از آیپک (لابی اسرائیل) پول می‌گیرد. من فکر می‌کنم ما در این برهه زمانی که یک مجرم محکوم‌شده را در کانون یک حلقه بچه باز داریم که دارد سر همه را کلاه می‌گذارد…

8 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC114 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: سیاست حزب ما حمایت از آزادی فلسطین، مخالفت با نسل‌کشی اسرائیل در غزه، مخالفت با اشغالگری اسرائیل و انضمام سرزمین‌های دیگران به اسرائیل است👇👇 👈 ژان لوک ملانشون، نامزد انتخابات ریاست‌جمهوری فرانسه: ✅ «ما برای کمک به فلسطینی‌ها و در مقابله با نسل‌کشی در غزه و الحاق کرانه باختری، به‌طور مستقیم وارد عمل خواهیم شد. کشتی‌های فرانسوی کاروان‌های دریایی شه…

7 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC836 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎥 جواد لاریجانی باز هم مهمل‌بافی و یاوه‌گویی و اکسلی کرد👇👇 👈 محمدجواد لاریجانی: ✅ بازدارندگی مطلق یعنی اینکه کسی اگر رهبری و مقامات عالی ما را ترور کند باید بداند که این عملیات در خانه خودش، با شکل مشابه آن، این ترور از طرف ما انجام خواهد شد. 🔻 یعنی اینکه اگر کسی به ما موشک بزند بداند که ۱۰ موشک دیگر به همان محل در کشور خودش هم موشک خواهد خورد؛ 🔻 یعنی اینکه کسی از مادر بمب‌ها علیه ایران استفاده کند، بداند که ما از …

7 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC682 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

🎥 جواد لاریجانی باز هم مهمل‌بافی و یاوه‌گویی و اکسلی کرد👇👇 فرسته بعدی

7 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC609 viewsread 8 November 2026

👈 General Michael Flynn @GenFlynn (Trump’s first National Security Advisor) in an interview with @MarioNawfal: ✅ Trump! #DeclareVictoryOverIranAndBringAllTroopsBackFromAroundIranAndTheMiddleEastToAmerica. ✅ Any expansion of the war with Iran is a strategic error for America’s finished empire. ✅ The greatest threat to national security is the “$41 trillion debt crisis” and “the deep distrust of the people toward the p…

7 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC484 viewsread 8 November 2026

👈 Conversation of @MaddieHale with Joe Kent @joekent16jan19 and Brett Erickson @BrettErickson28: ✅ #IranPosedNoThreatToAmericaButTrumpStartedAnUnwinnableWarFullOfStrategicErrorsSolelyOnIsraelsOrders ✅ American voters decisively rejected this Israel-made war. ✅ The assassination of Iran’s leader (Ayatollah Khamenei) along with commanders and moderate figures such as Ali Larijani was the greatest strategic error; this …

7 Nov 2026, 19:34 UTC390 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: عجب قماربازِ قهاری است این آخوندِ هفت‌خط؛ مجتبی خامنه‌ای!👇👇 👈 ببینید چطوری دلارهای ترامپِ بیچاره را به جیب می‌زند؟ ✅ تازه مامانش، ناتالی هارپ، اگه بفهمه مجتبی رو نفرین می‌کنه؛ ولی اگر دلارهای ترامپ را پس دهد، به او هم شیرِ تازه از تولید به مصرفِ ارگانیک می‌نوشاند، به شرطی که مانند ترامپ سرِ پستونک را گاز نگیرد و خونین نکند!

7 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC371 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: وحشتِ شدیدِ دونالد ترامپ از استیضاحِ مقامات دولتش توسط کنگره جدید و گشوده شدن پرونده‌های فسادشان پس از شکست در انتخابات میاندوره‌ای👇👇 👈 ترامپ: ✅ «دموکرات‌ها راه افتاده‌اند و دارند کلی آدم را — از جمله دادستان کل ایالات متحده و بقیه را — به استیضاح و هزار جور مجازاتِ دیگر تهدید می‌کنند، در حالی که خودشان هم اعتراف می‌کنند هیچ دلیلی برای این کار …

7 Nov 2026, 19:20 UTC359 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🎥 #لرزاندن_اربابی_اسرائیل_و_شکست_اول_اسرائیل_در_نه_به_جنگ_علیه_ایران: وحشتِ شدیدِ دونالد ترامپ از استیضاحِ مقامات دولتش توسط کنگره جدید و گشوده شدن پرونده‌های فسادشان پس از شکست در انتخابات میاندوره‌ای👇👇 👈 ترامپ: فرسته بعدی

Showing the 12 most recent of 784 posts we hold for @ganji_akbar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

هزار داستان با مسعود بهنود
@hezardastanbehnood · 44,153
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,823
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
سایت خبری-تحلیلی کلمه
@kaleme · 47,867
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
تحلیل و رصد
@tahlilvarasad · 75,357
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
ماجرای مشروطه با امیر خادم
@mashrutehwithAmirKhadem · 28,251
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
مصطفی ملکیان
@mostafamalekian · 65,830
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
ایرانیان دانمارک
@Iraniandanmark · 19,097
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
نگاه متفاوت (احمد زیدآبادی)
@ahmadzeidabad · 74,702
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
وبسایت فرهنگی صدانت
@Sedanet · 21,516
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
فردای بهتر (مصطفی تاجزاده)
@MostafaTajzadeh · 42,530
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
آینده (عباس عبدی)
@abdiabbas · 29,702
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
سخنرانی‌ها
@sokhanranihaa · 132,160
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
شبکه توسعه
@I_D_Network · 38,576
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
دیپلماسی
@Bestdiplomacy · 19,750
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 September 2026
شگفتی‌ها و عجایب دنیا
@ajaiebdonia · 35,517
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
ویرایش ذهن | شهاب‌الدین حائری شیرازی
@virayeshe_zehn · 30,498
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
راه نو🖤
@Newwaypolitics · 21,956
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Discourse
@Discourseees · 25,166
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری)
@iranazadvaabad · 31,488
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
سهند ایرانمهر
@sahandiranmehr · 37,746
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
موسیقی گلها
@MousighiGolha · 30,091
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
دلنوشته ها - رحیم قمیشی
@ghomeishi3 · 33,479
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
امتداد
@emtedadnet · 20,254
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 27 September 2026
دیدارنیوز
@didarnews1 · 20,952
Telegram ranks this channel #99 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اکبر گنجی” (@ganji_akbar), 11,209 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ganji_akbar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.