21 دقیقه میکس نوستالژی »🎤 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark 🎧
❤7🙏2👍1

Channel
@Iraniandanmark
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,110subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001003908554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Iraniandanmark |
| Description | «ایرانیان دانمارک🇩🇰»؛ نخستین و پرمخاطبترین رسانه فارسیزبانان در دانمارک، همراه شما در تلگرام و اینستاگرام با تازهترین خبرها و گزارشهای روزمره. ارتباط با ما، فقط تبليغات و ارسال سوژه:! @dk_iranian |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Iraniandanmark |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “ايرانيان دانمارک” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:33 | 19,110 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 19,108 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 19,107 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 19,116 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 19,112 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 19,109 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 19,102 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 19,098 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 19,103 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 19,095 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 19,096 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 19,093 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 19,097 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 19,092 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 19,094 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 19,104 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 19,107 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 19,095 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 19,088 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 19,096 | first reading |
703 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 696 of 703 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 703 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,428,411 |
| Reactions total | 21,599 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 114 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21,599 reactions across 694 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,115 | 28.3% | |
| 👍 | 5,635 | 26.1% | |
| 🤣 | 2,682 | 12.4% | |
| 💔 | 1,763 | 8.16% | |
| 🙏 | 1,201 | 5.56% | |
| 💯 | 934 | 4.32% | |
| 😢 | 604 | 2.80% | |
| 🤯 | 564 | 2.61% | |
| 💩 | 482 | 2.23% | |
| 😱 | 358 | 1.66% | |
| 🖕 | 323 | 1.50% | |
| 😡 | 281 | 1.30% | |
| 😨 | 241 | 1.12% | |
| 😭 | 119 | 0.551% | |
| 🕊 | 93 | 0.431% | |
| 🤮 | 74 | 0.343% | |
| 😁 | 72 | 0.333% | |
| ⚡ | 27 | 0.125% | |
| 🎉 | 17 | 0.079% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.032% | |
| 1 further kind | 7 | 0.032% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 696 of the 703 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 703 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
21 دقیقه میکس نوستالژی »🎤 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark 🎧
❤7🙏2👍1
بدون عروسی رفتن سر زندگی مد شده دیگه همه به این نتیجه رسیدن چرا اینهمه هزینه کنیم واسه یک مشت فامیل بی خاصیت قبل از نسل ماهم که عروسیا تو خونه بود یک چلوکباب میدادن سر و تهش درمیومد فقط جر خوردنش برای نسل ما بود سال ۸۹حدود ۲۰میلیون خرج عروسیم شد واسه یک مشت اسکل که دیگه ندیدمشون!!! ✍️نگین 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
👍33💯8❤5💔2
پیشنهاد ممنوعیت صادرات خوک زنده از دانمارک یک گروه 36 نفره از شهروندان دانمارکی پیشنهاد کردهاند که صادرات خوک زنده به کشورهای دیگر ممنوع شود. سال گذشته، دانمارک حدود 17 میلیون خوک زنده صادر کرد؛ یعنی تقریباً نیمی از کل خوکهای تولیدشده در کشور. این گروه میخواهد صادرات حیوانات زنده طی 5 سال آینده متوقف شود. آنها معتقدند برای رفاه بیشتر حیوانات، بهتر است خوکها به جای انتقال زنده به کشورهای دیگر، در داخل دانمارک کشت…
👍9❤1
سیستم جدید ارزیابی قیمت خانهها و املاک در دانمارک دوباره با تأخیر روبهرو شده است. به همین دلیل، Rigsrevisionen، نهاد حسابرسی دانمارک، تصمیم گرفته است بررسی کند چرا اجرای این سیستم اینقدر طول کشیده است.این سیستم در سالهای اخیر بارها به دلیل مشکلات و تأخیرها مورد انتقاد قرار گرفته است./BT ✍️ 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
🙏8❤1👍1
🔴 نتانیاهو: رژیم جمهوریاسلامی سقوط میکنه. مطمئن باشید. داره نفسهای آخرشو میکشه. تمام سیستم ما تحت هدایت من درحال تحقق این هدفه. ✍️ 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
❤60🙏14💯6👍2💔1🕊1
🔴ترامپ: بعد از سه ماه، اونا ۵۰ هزارنفر رو کشته بودن. اما الان میشنوم که ۲۰ الی ۲۵ هزارنفر دیگه بهش اضافه شده. اونا ۶۵ هزارنفر معترض رو کشتن. اونا به مردم معترض شلیک میکنن. درست وسط ابروهاشون ✍️ 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
💔44🙏6👍4💯4❤1
🔴ترامپ: اونا (جمهوری اسلامی) هرکاری میکنن رو ما میبینیم. بدون دونستن ما توالت هم نمیتونن برن.😎 ✍️ 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
🤣43❤4👍2💯2🕊1
کارلسبرگ دانمارک از پپسی و توبورگ عقب ماند برند دانمارکی با پسزمینه سبز معروف و نوشته سفید، در میان دوستداران آبجو در سراسر جهان شناختهشده و محبوب است. با این حال، شرکت بزرگ کارلسبرگ بیشتر درآمد خود را از فروش آبجوی کارلسبرگ به دست نمیآورد. در سالهای گذشته، توبورگ سهم بیشتری از حجم فروش این شرکت را به خود اختصاص داده بود. اما حالا یک برند دیگر که متعلق به کارلسبرگ است نیز از برند اصلی این شرکت پیشی گرفته است. …
❤9👍5
استرس کارهای روزمره، از آماده کردن غذای بچهها تا خرید و درست کردن شام، زندگی جنسی بسیاری از والدین در دانمارک، را تحت تأثیر قرار داده است./BT 📢 جزئیات بیشتر این خبر را اینجا بخوانید: 👇👇 🔗 instagram.com/iraniandanmark 📝 تازهترین اخبار دانمارک با ما 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
👍12💯5❤4🙏2
مرد 54 ساکن جنوب یولند دانمارک، به 2 سال زندان بهدلیل خشونت علیه شریک زندگی محکوم شد روزنامه اویسن در گزارشی نوشت ؛ مرد 54 ساله شریک زندگی خود را با شعلهافکن علفهای هرز سوزاند و در دو مورد دیگر نیز او را مورد خشونت قرار داد و بهطور غیرقانونی مجبور به انجام کاری کرد.او در تمام اتهامات مجرم شناخته شد و به 2 سال زندان محکوم شد. پس از صدور حکم همچنان در بازداشت موقت باقی ماند./آویسن ✍️ 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
🤯16😱7👍3❤1🙏1
بیچاره ترامپ از دشمنم شانس نیاورد 😎 جانفدای حکومت پول ندارد دندانش درست کند 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
🤣67❤4👍2
لارس لوکه راسموسن، وزیر امور خارجه دانمارک، سفیر روسیه در کپنهاگ را در واکنش به حادثه پهپادی فرودگاه لایپزیگ احضار کرد ✍️ 🇩🇰 @iraniandanmark
🙏14👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 703 posts we hold for @Iraniandanmark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Iraniandanmark edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 981,081 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایرانیان دانمارک” (@Iraniandanmark), 19,110 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iraniandanmark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.