Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +358. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,332–5,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 09:37
5,744
+34
15 Sept 2026, 06:55
5,710
+16
12 Sept 2026, 02:19
5,694
+29
7 Sept 2026, 20:42
5,665
+55
2 Sept 2026, 18:57
5,610
+49
30 Aug 2026, 22:56
5,561
+41
27 Aug 2026, 23:58
5,520
+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:33
5,519
+12
22 Aug 2026, 11:03
5,507
+8
18 Aug 2026, 17:43
5,499
+13
16 Aug 2026, 01:43
5,486
+20
12 Aug 2026, 18:33
5,466
+57
9 Aug 2026, 20:56
5,409
+23
6 Aug 2026, 20:10
5,386
no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:31
5,386
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 44 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 05s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,703 reactions across 44 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,751
48.7%
🤣
2,222
28.8%
🤮
1,123
14.6%
❤
241
3.13%
😁
176
2.28%
🔥
86
1.12%
👎
40
0.519%
💔
19
0.247%
😱
18
0.234%
😢
15
0.195%
🕊
9
0.117%
🤩
2
0.026%
😍
1
0.013%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,703 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 44 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nejatbahrami. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
گزارش سفیر آمریکا از گلایههای شاه
در ارتباط با پست احداث ذوبآهن در ایران و نکاتی که گفتم، به این گزارش مفصل سفیر آمریکا در ایران — که در متن بهش اشاره کردم — توجه کنید. این گزارش برای سفارت خارجهٔ آمریکا ارسال شده، در تابستان ۱۳۴۴، همزمان با پیشرفت توسعه روابط اقتصادی با شوروی.
نکات مهمتر این گزارش رو صرفاً ذکر میکنم:
در ۳۱ اوت ۱۹۶۵، سفیر آمریکا در تهران گزارشی از گفتوگوی حدود دو ساعتونیمه خود با محمدرضاشاه…
به ایراناینتزنشنال گفتم برخلاف نظر اصلاحطلبان و عدهای در دولت ترامپ، جمهوری اسلامی در داخل به سمت سرکوب بیشتر و در سیاست خارجی به سمت ایجاد تنش بیشتر حرکت خواهدکرد.
@Nejatbahrami
🔹 رئیس دولت انتقالی مورد نظر فرناز فصیحی و شرکا در جلسهٔ تشخیص مصلحت نظام!
احتمالا گزارشهای آنچنانی درباره مموتی با هدف اختلال در فرایند قبضه قدرت در تیم طائب-مجتبی و تلاشی برای کمک به جناح اصلاحاتچی رژیم بوده و الان طبیعتا این تلاشها ناکام مانده!
@Nejatbahrami
رسانههای حکومتی هم کمکم از اُوردوز کردن مداح بر اثر مصرف مواد و قتل ناموسی و اینجور چیزها مینویسند اما فعال حقوقبشر و عضو نهضت آزادی ایران و جامعهشناس چپ همچنان اصراردارند این قتل را به «مردم خشمگین ایران» نسبتدهند. مثلا عمادالدین باقی حتی در توییت خود عکس مادر جاویدنام #سودا_اکرمی_فرد را هم آورده که بگوید در قتل این مداح دست داشتهاست!
#حمیدرضا_رجب_زاده
@Nejatbahrami
تصور کنید ذوالقدر میانهروی رژیم شده و به این دلیل برکنارشده! انتصابات جدید نیز مسیر حرکت رژیم را نشان میدهد: تشدید سرکوب داخلی و افزایش تنش خارجی.
@Nejatbahrami
🔹 خب ترامپ و اصلاحطلبان به آرزوی خود رسیدند. لایه جدید از رهبران و چهرههای رژیم که قرار است در خارج توافق کنند و در داخل بنسلمان شوند!
@Nejatbahrami
با امثال سعید لیلاز وارد مباحث اقتصادی و تاریخی نشوید. خودش بهتر از شما میداند اقتصاد دهه چهل و پنجاه چه بوده. فقط انگل است و دارد خوب میچاپد. بیشتر از حزباللهیهای نفهم به جیب میزند. با مخوفترین آدمهای امنیتی نظام هم شریک است!
@Nejatbahrami
شما فکر کن آمریکایی که رایش سوم را ترکاند، امپراطور ژاپن را به تسلیم و خشوع واداشت و اتحاد جماهیر شوروی را ساقط کرد الان دارد به طرح و نقشههای محسن رضایی ملنگ و شریعتمداری معتاد کیهان، می بازد!!
درب آن پنتاگون و دانشکدههای نظامی آمریکا را باید گل گرفت!
- ارسالی مخاطبان
@Nejatbahrami
این شارلاتان در دوره وزارتش مقامهای خارجی را بدون اطلاعش به ایران دعوت میکردند اما از بس حقیر بود هیچ غلطی نمیکرد. بعد در برابر سوال یک دانشجو و پشت سر شاه فقید اینجور عرعر میکند. همه حرفهایش هم دروغ و بیاساس. خاک بر سرت ظریف!
@Nejatbahrami
👍186🤮70🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @nejatbahrami. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
I am Zeus @zeus110 · 23,180 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
تـاریخ ایـران بـا نـادر شـاه @naader_shah · 50,009 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Discourse @Discourseees · 23,633 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
کمپین بازگشت شاهزاده @C_B_SHAHZADEH · 33,932 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Kcex 🏦 صرافی کی سی ایکس @Kcex1 · 76,761 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
اتحاد ملی ایران | اخبار جنگ @OmidIranAzad · 55,406 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
همگام با رضاشاه دوم @siasattalkh · 63,013 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
پاسارگاد نیوز KFP @PN_KFP · 25,297 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
اندیشه @andiiishe · 33,516 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
Farah Pahlavi - فرح پهلوی @farahdibapahlavi · 36,961 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“️ نجات بهرامی” (@nejatbahrami), 5,744 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nejatbahrami.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.