Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Finance & Economics

Channel

Finance & Economics

@UTfinance

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,579subscribers

+133 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001017048195
TypeChannel
Username@UTfinance
Description/مالی و اقتصاد و فلسفه سیاسی/مقاله و کتاب‌ و ویدیو/ 📚E-Library @UTfinance ارتباط با ادمین: @UTfinanceAdmin 📌فایل‌هایی که در کانال منتشر می‌شوند یا با موافقت مؤلف و ناشر منتشر شده‌اند، یا پیش از این به طور گسترده در دسترس همگان بوده‌اند.©
Created18 January 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UTfinance

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,44612,57912,512.55 August 2026 — 12,446 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,446 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,451 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,454 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,457 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,464 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,486 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,493 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,489 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,491 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,506 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,522 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,526 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,532 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,529 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,551 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,560 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,555 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,553 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,556 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,566 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,571 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,579 subscribers5 August 202629 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,426–12,599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 21:0512,579+8
28 Aug 2026, 20:4412,571+5
27 Aug 2026, 20:0312,566+9
26 Aug 2026, 16:4512,557+1
25 Aug 2026, 20:1612,556+3
24 Aug 2026, 17:4712,553-2
23 Aug 2026, 01:4612,555-5
21 Aug 2026, 13:0512,560+9
20 Aug 2026, 14:1312,551+22
19 Aug 2026, 13:4212,529-3
18 Aug 2026, 16:4312,532+6
17 Aug 2026, 19:1512,526+4
16 Aug 2026, 14:5612,522+16
14 Aug 2026, 22:4812,506+15
13 Aug 2026, 14:0512,491+2
12 Aug 2026, 15:1412,489-4
11 Aug 2026, 16:3412,493+7
10 Aug 2026, 15:1512,486+22
9 Aug 2026, 14:1412,464+7
8 Aug 2026, 16:2212,457first reading

Engagement

169 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 12,579 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
169 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
169
of 169 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 167 of 169 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held169 (2 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total236,220
Reactions total3,940
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,710
Videos
949
Links
3,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 50m
Average length
8m 58s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,215 reactions across 149 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,10634.4%
94129.3%
👌33810.5%
👎32210.0%
👏1645.10%
💔1615.01%
🤬1304.04%
🔥391.21%
😱90.28%
😢40.124%
10.031%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,940reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC73 viewsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @historytextt

📚 درباره این کانال این کانال با هدف معرفی و گردآوری مقالات و منابع مرتبط با تاریخ معاصر ایران شکل گرفته است. قرار نیست فقط آثار شناخته‌شده را معرفی کنیم. مقاله‌های تازه، پژوهش‌های کمتر دیده‌شده، نوشته‌های قدیمی و منابعی که می‌توانند برای مطالعه و پژوهش مفید باشند، همگی جای خودشان را اینجا دارند. علاوه بر آن، تاکید بر رویکرد نویسنده برای فهم بهتر مطالب او هم در دستور کار قرار می‌گیرد اگر مقاله‌ای نوشته‌اید که فکر م

30 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC274 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026

👤 اشکان زارع مجله موسسه میزس، در باب ۲۵۰ سالگی آمریکا ویژه نامه‌ای دارد که مقاله اول آن از لارسن بی. پلایلر را خواندم. در ادامه نکاتی را درباره این مقاله خواهم نوشت. جستار یاد شده در بالا بر پایه‌ی رویکرد لیبرتارین/مکتب اتریش (رویکرد موری راتبارد) به رشته تحریر در آمده است؛ رویکردی که اعلامیه استقلال را نه بنیانی برای تأسیس یک «ملت واحد»، که یک قراردادِ صِرف برای جدایی (Secession) میان ۱۳ واحد مستقل، یعنی همان

👍6👎5

29 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC807 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

📕 به زودی تجدید چاپ کتاب «مشکل سوسیالیسم» 👤 نوشته: تامس دی‌لورنزو ✍ ترجمه: محمدحسن وکیلی برای اینکه دیدگاه «مطلوبی» به سوسیالیسم داشته باشیم یا باید درس‌هایی که جهان از اواخر قرن نوزدهم به بعد از سوسیالیسم آموخت را فراموش کرده باشیم یا اینکه تاکنون اصلاً درسی از آن نیاموخته باشیم. بدیهی است که برای بسیاری از جوانان مورد دوم صدق می‌کند. سوسیالیسم ابتدا به‌عنوان «مالکیت دولتیِ ابزار تولید» تعریف شد، به همین دلیل اس

10

29 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC849 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026

‍ 📄 اصول علم اقتصاد کارل منگر در سال ۱۸۷۱ کتاب اصول علم اقتصاد (Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre) را منتشر کرد و علم اقتصاد هنوز نتوانسته است به‌طور کامل از پیامدهای نادیده گرفتن آن رهایی پیدا کند. منگر صرفاً در حاشیه‌های اقتصاد کلاسیک دست نبرد؛ او نظریه ارزش کار را که از زمان آدام اسمیت به اندیشه اقتصادی راه یافته بود و در مارکس به نتیجه‌ای ویرانگر رسید، درهم کوبید. ارزش از تعداد ساعاتی که یک کارگر صرف کوبیدن

8

29 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,620 views1 reactionsread 30 August 2026
File

📕 مجله MISESIAN شماره جولای و آگوست 2026 📎 PDF ◽️@utfinance◽️

1

29 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC851 views1 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

📕 مجله MISESIAN شماره جولای و آگوست 2026 📎 دانلود ◽️@utfinance◽️

1

29 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC965 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026

📄 پیامد تفکر التقاطی در اقتصاد | اقتصادِ مختلط جمع محاسن است یا ترکیب تناقض‌ها؟ | «اقتصادِ سالادی» ترکیب ناممکن بازار و دولت است در کتاب‌های درسی «اقتصاد» که در ایران تدریس می‌شود، وقتی نظام‌های اقتصادی مختلف -از جمله سرمایه‌داری، سوسیالیسم و نظام اقتصادی اسلام- معرفی می‌شوند، در توصیف اقتصاد ایران، آن را سیستمی «مختلط» معرفی می‌کنند. سیستمی که هم بخش خصوصی در آن فعال است و هم دولت در بخش‌هایی مداخله‌گر و حتی عرضه‌ک

6👍2👎1

28 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC974 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026

🖥 اکونومی پلیطیک 👤 امیرحسین خالقی 👤 علی رضاپور 👤 مصطفی صادق 1️⃣ قسمت نخست: آیا هژمونی دلار رو به پایان است؟ سقوط دلار تا کجا؟ 2️⃣ قسمت دوم: اقتصاد سیاسی طلا؛ پشت‌پرده جهش‌های تاریخی طلا، دولت یا مردم 3️⃣ قسمت سوم: اقتصاد چین؛ از قرن تحقیر تا جنگ تجاری با آمریکا 4️⃣ قسمت چهارم: آمریکا در آستانه بحران بدهی؟ ◼️@LiberalPodcast◼️ ◽️@utfinance◽️

7👍3👎2

28 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC952 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
File

🎧 حق جست‌وجوی خوشبختی 👤 ارائه مرتضی کاظمی در نشست رونمایی کتاب «اقتصاد از دیدگاه انسانی» نوشته محمد طبیبیان 🗓 ۳۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 📍 کتابسرای راوی 🔹 درباره نسبت میان خوشبختی، آزادی و علم‌اقتصاد؛ و اینکه آیا علم‌اقتصاد توانسته‌ به خوشبختی و شادکامی انسان کمک کند؟ ◼️@LiberalPodcast◼️

👍7

28 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,000 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

◽️ دو گزارش از تورم مرداد: ◾️ بانک مرکزی (4 شهریور 1405): تورم ماهانه: 3.7 درصد تورم نقطه به نقطه: 84.4 درصد تورم سالانه: 65 درصد ◾️ مرکز آمار (6 شهریور 14050): تورم ماهانه: 3.4 درصد تورم نقطه به نقطه: 89 درصد تورم سالانه: 69.9 درصد ◽️@utfinance◽️

💔5😱5😢2

28 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,230 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

🖥 مستند «لبه خاموشی» | روایتی تکان‌ دهنده از بحران انرژی و آینده ایران ©️ چراز «لبه خاموشی» از یک تناقض ساده اما عجیب شروع می‌شود: چطور کشوری که روی یکی از بزرگ‌ترین ذخایر نفت و گاز جهان نشسته، هر سال بیشتر با قطعی برق، کمبود گاز و بحران تأمین انرژی روبه‌رو می‌شود؟ برای ساخت این مستند، چند ماه درباره بحران انرژی ایران تحقیق کردیم و با مدیران صنعت برق و گاز، اقتصاددانان، پژوهشگران، صاحبان صنایع و کسانی که مستقیماً

5

28 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC908 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @mortezakazemiiVideo

🔹 حق جستجوی خوشبختی ویدئو (۲۱ دقیقه) 🔹 ارائه مرتضی کاظمی در نشست رونمایی کتاب «اقتصاد از دیدگاه انسانی» نوشته محمد طبیبیان 🗓 ۳۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 📍 کتابسرای راوی 🔹 درباره نسبت میان خوشبختی، آزادی و علم‌اقتصاد؛ و اینکه آیا علم‌اقتصاد توانسته‌ به خوشبختی و شادکامی انسان کمک کند؟ http://t.me/mortezakazemii

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @UTfinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 37,834 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کتاب‌های کمیاب و نایاب
@freeforbiddenbooks · 41,046
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
فردای اقتصاد
@feghtesad · 60,043
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
محمدعلی جنت خواه
@jannatkhah · 107,839
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
سخنرانی‌ها
@sokhanranihaa · 131,544
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
اکوایران
@ecoiran_webtv · 66,088
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
تاریخ‌اندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی
@tarikhandishi · 111,839
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
اقتصاد به زبان ساده
@eghtesaderooz · 56,513
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Finance & Economics” (@UTfinance), 12,579 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UTfinance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.