Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زیر سقف آسمان

Channel

زیر سقف آسمان

@NewHasanMohaddesi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,727subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001212648750
TypeChannel
Username@NewHasanMohaddesi
Descriptionزیر سقف آسمان مقام یک جست‌وجوگر است. آرشیو تأملات و پژوهش های دکتر حسن محدثی جامعه شناس و استاد دانشگاه تماس: @Ziresagfeasman2017
Created6 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/NewHasanMohaddesi

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,7109,8059,757.55 August 2026 — 9,790 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,790 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,805 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,799 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,802 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,798 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,794 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,790 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,783 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,780 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,772 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,768 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,778 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,760 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,759 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,749 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,748 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,735 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,732 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,729 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,730 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,710 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,727 subscribers9,7275 August 20262 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 88 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,696–9,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 06:489,727+17
30 Oct 2026, 08:369,710-20
26 Oct 2026, 22:509,730+1
24 Oct 2026, 07:279,729-3
21 Oct 2026, 02:279,732-3
18 Oct 2026, 10:469,735-13
15 Oct 2026, 12:159,748-1
12 Oct 2026, 12:469,749-10
5 Oct 2026, 09:389,759-1
27 Sept 2026, 00:399,760-18
17 Sept 2026, 13:019,778+10
13 Sept 2026, 12:389,768-4
9 Sept 2026, 19:599,772-8
1 Sept 2026, 08:359,780-3
29 Aug 2026, 07:599,783-7
26 Aug 2026, 03:349,790-4
23 Aug 2026, 06:299,794-4
19 Aug 2026, 11:589,798-4
16 Aug 2026, 06:129,802+3
12 Aug 2026, 17:229,799first reading

Engagement

167 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.14%
avg views ÷ 9,727 subscribers
Avg views / post
500
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 167 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held167 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total18,489
Reactions total499
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,820
Videos
≈919
Links
≈4,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 51s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,138 reactions across 149 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍87440.9%
❤55425.9%
👎22810.7%
👌22410.5%
🤣622.90%
👏532.48%
😢411.92%
😍361.68%
😁301.40%
💔160.748%
🤔140.655%
❤‍🔥30.14%
🔥20.094%
💯10.047%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 167 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 167 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (64.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 08:57 UTC52 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

♦️در مطالعه‌ی جنبش‌های هزاره‌ای اعتبار تاریخ‌نگاری‌ی دکتر زرین‌کوب برای من فرو ریخت ✍حسن محدثی‌ی گیلوایی ۱۵ آبان ۱۴۰۵ پانزده سال درگیر یک سوال دینی بودم. در رساله‌ی دکتری به این سوال ام پاسخ دادم و خلاص شدم از دست اش. موضوع اصلی‌ی کار من جنبش‌های هزاره‌ای بود و برای این‌که بتوانم روی آن کار کنم، یک عنوان پوششی انتخاب کردم تا موضوع و کار ام رد نشود: نقش و کارکرد اجتماعی‌ی اسطوره در ایران پس از اسلام. در این رساله ی…

❤5👌1

6 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

♦️در مطالعه‌ی جنبش‌های هزاره‌ای اعتبار تاریخ‌نگاری‌ی دکتر زرین‌کوب برای من فرو ریخت ✍حسن محدثی‌ی گیلوایی ۱۵ آبان ۱۴۰۵ #رساله‌ی_دکتری #جنبش‌های_هزاره‌ای #عبدالحسین_زرین‌کوب #تاریخ‌نگاری_ایده‌ئولوژیک @NewHasanMohaddesi

❤2

6 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

♦️در مطالعه‌ی جنبش‌های هزاره‌ای اعتبار تاریخ‌نگاری‌ی دکتر زرین‌کوب برای من فرو ریخت ✍حسن محدثی‌ی گیلوایی ۱۵ آبان ۱۴۰۵ #رساله‌ی_دکتری #جنبش‌های_هزاره‌ای #عبدالحسین_زرین‌کوب #تاریخ‌نگاری_ایده‌ئولوژیک @NewHasanMohaddesi

❤3

6 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC66 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @tajeddin_mohammadbagher

☸️نقدی بر نقدِ آقای دکتر قیم [بخش دوم و پایانی] ✍️محمدباقر تاج الدین 4.آقای قیم منابعی معتبر از زرتشت برای شما می اورم که بیهوده و ناپسند بودن باده گساری و فدیه و قربانی را نشان می دهد و نه وجود نداشتن آن ها که بحث دیگری است! و مهم تر این که بی دقتی ها و محقق نبودن شما را هم اثبات می کند! شما حتی به خودتان زحمت نداید که بروید و آثار اصلی زرتشتیان مانند گاهان و یسنا را بخوانید که بدانید در برخی از بندهای این آثار …

👎5👍1

6 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC67 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @tajeddin_mohammadbagher

☸️نقدی بر نقدِ آقای دکتر قیم [بخش نخست] ✍️محمدباقر تاج الدین ✅با توجه به این که مطالبی دربارۀ بی دقتی های اقای دکتر قیم در داوری دربارۀ دکتر عبدالحسین زرین کوب منتشر کردم ایشان اقدام به نقدی بر مطالب منتشر شده ام کردند که اینک پاسخ و نقدی بر نقدشان منتشر می کنم. 1.پرسش نخست این است که اقای دکتر قیم از کجا و بر اساس چه شاخص ها و معیارهایی "تعصب بیش از حد" مرا به دکتر زرین کوب تشخیص داده اند؟ من فقط در چند نوشتۀ کوتا…

👎5👍1

5 Nov 2026, 20:11 UTC387 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @IranAWSPhoto

کارگروه اجتماعی انجمن ایرانی مطالعات زنان با همکاری خانه اندیشمندان علوم انسانی برگزار می کند. وبینار تخصصی: *واکاوی تجربه ی زیسته ی خودهای نمایشی در زندگی مشترک با حضور *دکتر احمد بی باک *** دبیر نشست *دکتر سمیه سعیدی *۷ *زمان*: سه شنبه ۱۹ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۱۶ *مکان:* با گزینه میهمان در لینک زیر وارد شوید https://skyroom.online/ch/iraws/iraws #انجمن ایرانی مطالعات زنان http://ble.ir/join/GS7FSaQPUN https:…

🤣3

5 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTC566 views44 reactionsread 6 November 2026

♦️ایده‌ی ایالات متحده‌ی ایران از دکتر یدالله کریمی‌پور / مخاطبان گرامی لطفاً در باره‌ی ایده‌ی دکتر کریمی‌پور نظر بدهید! بازنشر: ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ ایالات متحده ایران این اندیشه که با برقراری توازن در سیاست خارجی، احیای مناسبات با واشنگتن، رفع کامل تحریم‌ها، بازگشت کشور به جامعه بین‌المللی و حتی غربگرایی یا خلاصه با سدزدایی از مسیر توسعه، موتور رشد و پیشرفت ایران روشن خواهد شد و کشور در مقیاس منطقه‌ای، از نظر رفاه، آزادی …

👍31👎8❤2🤣2🤔1

5 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC596 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

♦️یکی از نتایج مدیریت مرکزگرای کشور در زبان رییس دولت بازنشر: ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ #مرکزگرایی #مدیریت_مرکزگرا @NewHasanMohaddesi

👌17👏2👎1

5 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC951 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

♦️اگر تو آمده بودی / شعری فارسی از شیون فومنی بازنشر: ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ اگر تو آمده بودی بهار می‌آمد بهار با همه‌ی برگ و بار می‌آمد گلوی زمزمه تَر می‌شد از ترانه‌ی رود تَرَنُّمی به لبِ جویبار می‌آمد سپیده‌ای که پُر از پلکِ باز پنجره‌هاست به صبح آیینه‌ها بی غبار می‌آمد به من که هیچ ... به چشم کبودِ منتظران سوادِ سایه‌ی آن تک‌سوار می‌آمد شکوفه بود و شکفتن به بانگ نوشانوش دوباره آن عسلی روزگار می‌آمد زمان به کامِ دلِ …

❤16🤣2

5 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC589 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

♦️شعر گیلکی در اشعار شیون فومنی در اوج است ✍️حسن محدثی‌ی گیلوایی ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ از نظر من شعر گیلکی با اشعار شیون به اوج می‌رسد. شیون فومنی در شعر اش به‌نحو بسیار عالی زنده‌گی‌ی اجتماعی را با زبانی طنزآمیز نقد می‌کند. شعر شیون آکنده از واژه‌گان گیلکی‌ است و کم‌تر آمیخته به زبان فارسی است و بیش‌تر از هجوم واژه‌گان فارسی در امان مانده است. هم‌چنین شعر شیون بسیار فاخر و دل‌نشین و سلیس و روان است. اگر شعر گیلکی‌ای به…

❤20👍10🤣1

5 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC553 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

♦️نمونه‌ای از واکنش‌های تحصیل‌کرده‌ها و غیرتحصیل‌کرده‌های ایرانی در ایام اخیر! #بت‌پرستی #اسطوره‌سازی #عبدالحسین_زرین‌کوب @NewHasanMohaddesi

🤣11😢5👍3🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 08:16 UTC662 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026

♦️زیان های تاریخ /۲ بحث اینکه تاریخ مفید هست یا نیست جداست اما آنچه که بیان شد مضرات تاریخ نیست، بلکه سو استفاده از تاریخ و تفسیر رمانتیک آن است. این که ملی گرایان ایرانی درک نادرستی از دوگانه عرب و عجم دارند، تقصیر تاریخ نیست. اتفاقا مطالعه علمی تاریخ میتواند به ما بفهماند که ساسانیان چندان هم فرشته نبودند که اعراب را دیو تصور کنیم! این که ملی گرایان رمانتیک برداشت نادرستی از تاریخ دارند تقصیر حافظه تاریخی نیست…

👍5😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 167 posts we hold for @NewHasanMohaddesi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@NewHasanMohaddesi edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @NewHasanMohaddesi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

اصغر ایزدی جیران
@IzadiJeiran · 1,671
12 posts
آرشیو جلسات کتابخوانی «فراگیری»
@ArchiveOfLiberalism · 3,610
4 posts
شهرام اتفاق - Shahram Ettefagh
@YekGamPish · 244
4 posts
برنج توسکا
@toskarice · 52
3 posts
تاریخانه: تاریخ معاصر به روایت علی مرادی مراغه‌ای
@tarikhanehmoradi · 15,580
2 posts
پیشگیری از خودکشی | دکتر بهرامی
@ardeshir3bahrami · 1,651
1 post
ART CHANNEL
@artchanel · 20,142
1 post
یادداشت های حسن انصاری
@azbarresihayetarikhi · 9,218
1 post
از گذشته و اکنون
@azgozashtevaaknoon · 2,276
1 post
BBCPersian
@bbcpersian · 771,497
1 post
دکتر محمد دهقانی
@dmdehghani · 9,001
1 post
امتداد
@emtedadnet · 20,253
1 post
کانال انجمن ایرانی مطالعات زنان
@IranAWS · 483
1 post
یدالله کریمی پور
@Karimipour_K · 21,464
1 post
خبرگزاری خبرآنلاین
@khabaronline_ir · 115,110
1 post
دکتر محسن محمودی/فلسفه
@Mahmudi_mohsenn · 1,254
1 post
🍷 می ناب 🍷
@MEYNAAB · 3,235
1 post
انتشارات ‌روزنه
@rowzanehnashr · 3,283
1 post
هفت اقلیم (سعید معدنی)
@Saeed_Maadani · 2,798
1 post
تبارشناسی کتاب
@tabarshenasi_ketab · 4,313
1 post
تاریخانه: پادکستها و آرشیو کانال علی مرادی مراغه ای
@tarikhanehmorady · 4,458
1 post
Akademi
@toAkademi_channel · 779
1 post
Finance & Economics
@UTfinance · 12,803
1 post
سخنرانی ها ، درس گفتارها ، گفت و گوها و دیگر برنامه های فرهنگی و مطالعات تطبیقی
@Vortrags · 5,767
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

جامعه‌شناسی
@iransociology · 37,359
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
مصطفی ملکیان
@mostafamalekian · 65,803
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
وبسایت فرهنگی صدانت
@Sedanet · 21,516
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
سخنرانی‌ها
@sokhanranihaa · 132,119
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
ܭߊ‌‌ܦ߭ܘ ܭࡅߺ߳ߊ‌‌ࡅߺ߲ࡉ
@sacafeketab · 28,667
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
کتابخانه نواندیشان
@Noandishaan_Book · 36,023
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
دیپلماسی
@Bestdiplomacy · 19,762
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 September 2026
اندیشه
@andiiishe · 33,214
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زیر سقف آسمان” (@NewHasanMohaddesi), 9,727 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewHasanMohaddesi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.