https://youtu.be/Na7ua_fOisA?si=hRyiGa1dMYiBgijN https://t.me/marzockacademy

Channel
آکادمی فلسفه و هنر مارزوک
@marzockacademy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,702subscribers
+1,154 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001453859610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marzockacademy |
| Description | کار فلسفه آزردن حماقت است. کانالِ فلسفه وهنر مارزوک https://t.me/marzockacademy لينک گروه آکادمی فلسفهی مارزوک https://t.me/+RgpoTxExbs0yOTA0 |
| Created | 23 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marzockacademy |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:19 | 16,702 | +47 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:20 | 16,655 | -18 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:50 | 16,673 | +75 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:11 | 16,598 | +50 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:37 | 16,548 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:26 | 16,550 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 16,554 | +118 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 16,436 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 16,443 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:52 | 16,463 | +96 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 16,367 | +18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 16,349 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 16,355 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 16,362 | +86 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 16,276 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 16,289 | -15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 16,304 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 16,307 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:34 | 16,319 | -13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:14 | 16,332 | first reading |
Engagement
309 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.01%
- avg views ÷ 16,702 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 336
- 71 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 71
- of 309 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 309 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 23,840 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,820
- Videos
- ≈965
- Links
- ≈10,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 45m 13s
- Average length
- 1m 40s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (18.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
🗂️برای ورود به مجموعهای جامع از هنر و فلسفه، کلیک کنید 📼سینما | 💬 فلسفه 🎵موسیقی | 📖ادبیات 👩🎨نقاشی | 👤روانشناسی
عزت نفس، وراهکارهای کاربردی برای افزایش عزت نفس سالم. 🗣دکترموذن https://t.me/marzockacademy
جناب اردبیلی در سطح سوژه تجربه را مقدم بر "من" میداند و اگر این تجربیات را در مقام روابط و مناسبات بکار بگیریم و گفته شود که نشان از انسداد دارد، در سطح بیناسوبژکتیو نیز روابط و مناسباتی ناگشوده و معیوب داریم.همچنین اردبیلی در سطح سوژهی سیاسی "زیستنِ معنادار سیاسی" را مقدم و ابتدا بر نظام سیاسی و شکل آن میآورد.بنابراین نظامی فلسفی ناظر به روابط و مناسبات را هم معطوف به انسان در مقام فرد و موجود نوعی، نیاز میباشد …
میشه گفت در واقع ی تکاپوی ذهنی یا جریان سیال افکار است که نویسندهاش با استفاده از روش شک رادیکال هر چیزی را بچالش کشیده تحلیل ژرف اون را میتوان در سه محور دید اول بن بست زبان و تفکر نویسنده متوجه شده که ما زندانی زبان هستیم و چون تفکر با زبان است هر تلاشی برای فرار از پوچی دوباره ما را به قالب کلمات برمیگرداند دوم نقد نهیلیسم فعال و منفعل او تناقض خلق معنا را به چالش میکشد و میگوید اگر اساسا ارزشی نیست پس ارزش …
—سؤال: Philosophize سلام خسته نباشید میخواستم ببینم نظرتون راجب این متن چیه / در رابطه با کتاب استاد اردبیلی —شک کردن به بدیهیات، بدیهیاتی که فرضهای ما در استدلالها بودند اما خودشان هیچ استدلالی ندارند .... پس هر استدلالی از این به بعد روی هواست آیا اینکه: اینها روی هواست ، حکم نیست؟ +شاید مشکل از زبان صفر و صدی ماست! شاید مشکل از تفکر ما که با زبان است؟ اصلا تفکر بدون زبان چگونه است؟ وقتی سلامی به نهیلیسمِ معرفتی…
سؤال یکی از دوستان در باب کتاب اصول مبارزه در زمانهٔ نیهیلیسم عطا رشیدی Philosophize @marzockacadey
بیکلام https://t.me/marzockacademy
چگونه در جهانی که همیشه مطابق میل ما نیست! آرام بمانیم؟ با متفاوت دیدن اما چطور؟ مارکوس_اورلیوس (Marcus Aurelius)، فیلسوف رواقی و امپراتور روم، در سال ۱۲۱ میلادی به دنیا آمد و در سال ۱۸۰ میلادی درگذشت، یعنی نزدیک به دو هزار سال پیش، در دورهای که جنگ، بیماری، مرگ، ناامنی و بیثباتی بخش جداییناپذیر زندگی انسانها بود. او در یکی از قدرتمندترین امپراتوریهای تاریخ زندگی میکرد و از سال ۱۶۱ تا ۱۸۰ میلادی امپراتور روم…
🔻 برشی از جلسه اول دوره روانشناسی زرد: پیشنهاداتی برای تشخیص شبه علم در روانشناسی، به همت موسسه علوم انسانی جیوگی مدرس: دکتر محمدرضا واعظ آذر ۱۴۰۲ 🔴 این ویدئو موضوعات زیر را دربرمی گیرد: شبه علم چیست؟ شبه علم در روانشناسی چیست؟ انگیزههای پدیدآورندگان شبه علم @tanhaatarazyekbarg https://t.me/marzockacademy
Showing the 12 most recent of 309 posts we hold for @marzockacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 24 posts on @marzockacademy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 30 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@daily_mood9 · 3422 postsپارادوکس
@metahistorical · 1,2212 postsموسی اکرمی: فلسفه از تعبیر جهان تا تغییر جهان
@musa_akrami · 8652 postsاندیشه ها
@andishehayee · 1,7441 postانجمن بانوان مهر ایین
@anjooooman · 1391 postبلقیس سلیمانی
@belgheissoleimani · 3471 postchistiha چیستی ها - پلی از فلسفه تا هنر
@chistiha · 2551 postمفهوم (Concept)
@conseptworld · 2101 postDUBIUM
@DubiumChannel · 3901 post«گاهِ» خِرَد
@gahekherad · 491 postاستوره , تاریخ و فلسفه زیستن
@historyandmyths · 4741 postآموزشگاه حلقه منطق
@LogicCircleAca · 4811 postانسانیات| در حوالی انسان، به روایتِ من
@MarryFarrokh · 1181 postمعین افسر| رتبه۱۰ و مشاور تمشک
@moein_tameshk · 1201 postPhilosophy Cafe ♨️
@PhilosophyCafe · 3,4601 postتبادلات علوم انسانی 💯
@tablistensani · 2971 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@farzan_agahi · 1,6085 postsتنهاتر از یک برگ: تأملاتی در فلسفه و علم
@tanhaatarazyekbarg · 3,4085 postsجامعه شناسی و اخلاق
@Sociology_of_Ethics · 1,5234 postsDaily mood
@daily_mood9 · 3423 postsیارا: مرکز پیشبرد فلسفه برای کودکان و جوانان(ICAPCY)
@yarabookhouse · 5133 postsنوشتن در آستانه
@elhammrad · 1362 postsدرنگها (محمدمهدی اردبیلی)
@PhilosophicalHalt · 16,3852 postsPhilosophy Cafe ♨️
@PhilosophyCafe · 3,4602 postsبارو
@Baruwiki · 4,3711 postدموس demos
@demos1402 · 13,4241 postدنیای کتاب ایران
@donyaye_ketab_iran · 5,4421 postآگورا
@gggggutt · 6401 postلکانخوانی
@readinglacan · 4,0561 postرنسانس
@renaissancetranslate · 8,6311 postیادداشت های شاهنامه خالقی مطلق
@shahnameh1000 · 3,5121 postنگارستان شروین وکیلی
@SherwinVakiliArt · 5,6651 postنوشتارهای چهارم پانته آگلپر
@soroodhaye_golpar · 641 postترجمان علوم انسانى
@tarjomaanweb · 78,1611 postنظریه های روانکاوی
@wilfred_bion · 1,1061 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@marzockacademy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 November 2026 – 8 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vkends · 24,564
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@KetabTOpdf · 63,562
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,314
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@anbar100 · 29,478
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@PDFDANESHGHAHY · 37,158
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@Sedanet · 21,515
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
@bankema · 32,634
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@absurdmindsmedia · 30,583
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
@zibaishenasi · 20,177
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 October 2026
@ReadingLandzapas · 23,573
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
@applyabroadnow · 26,749
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
@nutqiyyat · 30,687
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@sedayehdastan · 22,283
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 September 2026
@freeforbiddenbooks · 46,992
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@llib7 · 26,312
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
@HavalI_behesht12 · 21,321
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
@Arts1992 · 19,832
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
@sherwin_vakili · 22,225
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
@psychology_personaa · 20,709
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
@KetabZahra1369 · 52,330
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
@avabookchannel · 53,527
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
@sokhanranihaa · 132,152
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
@drsargolzaei · 35,628
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@khodavandegareshgh · 27,519
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی فلسفه و هنر مارزوک” (@marzockacademy), 16,702 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marzockacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.