آیا یک دیندار میتواند روانکاو شود؟ مقاله حاضر برای کسانی که دنبال روانکاو میگردند ضروری است. https://t.me/drakbarjabari

Channel
اکبر جباری
@drakbarjabari
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,354subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001474831308 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drakbarjabari |
| Created | 19 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drakbarjabari |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 3,354 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 3,353 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 3,360 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 3,361 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 3,358 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 3,359 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 3,360 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 3,362 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 3,363 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 3,365 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 3,360 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 3,350 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 3,348 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
📝 آیا اروپا در حال اسلامیزه شدن است؟ ✍ اکبر جباری در طول چند دهه اخیر، حاکمان کشورهای اسلامی، سرمایهگذاریهای کلانی در اروپا کردهاند. این سرمایهگذاریها محدود به حوزه اقتصاد نبوده، بل تا سطوح سیاسی نیز پیش رفته است. خرید سیاستمداران فاسد اروپایی با دلارهای مسلمانان، عملا راه ورود اسلام به اروپا را هموار کرده است. امروزه وقتی در لندن قدم میزنی، به وضوح احساس میکنی در یکی از شهرهای مراکش یا مصر هستی. این وضعیت محدو…
✅️ دوره آموزشی تربیت دازاینکاو به پایان رسید ❇️ مدرس: دکتر اکبر جباری ❇️ جلسه اول: ✔️ اتاق درمان دازاینکاوی چگونه است؟✔️ مراجع دازاینکاوی کیست؟ ✔️شنیدن دازاینکاوانه چگونه است؟ ❇️ جلسه دوم: ✔️ ویژگیهای تفسیر دازاینکاوانه✔️ پرسش بهمثابه ایجاد گشایش ✔️ تداعی آزاد بهمثابه توانایی روایتهای گوناگون ✔️ حسسایتزدایی و تولید معنا، دو مرحله از درمان✔️ گفتگوی فلسفی بهمثابه ورود به ساحت اونتولوژی ❇️ جلسه سوم: ✔️ انسان …
زین پس کلیه دورههای آموزش فلسفه و روانکاوی من که در قالب فایلهای صوتی و تصویری است، از طریق این کانال یوتیوپ منتشر خواهد شد تا به شکل رایگان در اختیار علاقهمندان به فلسفه و روانکاوی قرار گیرد. مدیریت کانال بر عهده سرکار خانم آرام فرزین است. سپاسگزار زحمات ایشان هستم. https://youtu.be/7frwcbefhM8?is=oesDi83YxoC4XX6z
درباره ناجوانمردی نزدیکان آنچیزی که در خیانت و ناجوانمردی نزدیکان، تروماتایز است، نه خود آن خیانت یا ناجوانمردی، بل فروپاشی جهان است که درد دارد. در خیانت عزیزانمان، گویی جهان بر سر ما آوار میشود و معنای خود را از دست میدهد. خیانت یک «اتفاق» است، اما آنچه ما را فلج میکند، «فروپاشی روایت» زندگیمان است. عزیزان، لنگرگاههای معنای ما هستند؛ وقتی آنها خیانت میکنند، نه فقط به ما، بل به جهانی که با آنها ساخته بودیم پشت کرد…
به عنوان مخالف جمهوری اسلامی که طعم زندانش را نیز چشیدهام، و چپ و راست و اصولگرا و اصلاحطلبش را از بالا تا پایین فاسد و مفسد و نادان و عقبمانده میشناسم، و معتقدم ظلمهای بیشماری این حکومت انجام داده که تقاص آنها را باید حالا حالاها پس دهد، فکر میکنم، جمهوری اسلامی اگر بتواند مساله رابطه با آمریکا و سپس مساله اسرائیل را حل کند و متمرکز شود بر روی توسعه کشور، برغم همه کینههایی که از این نظام داشتم، برایش آرزوی موفق…
❇️ یک داستان و سه روایت ✍️ نویسنده: امجد جباری 🎤 گوینده: امجد جباری 🎻 تدوین: محیالدین جباری @drakbarjabari
مدرسه مهرآیین: چرا می خواهم به کمک مردم یک معلم مستقل باقی بمانم و تبدیل به یک .......فرهنگی نشوم " وزن من عشق من است" سنت اگوستین ۱. نوشتن این یادداشت برخلاف تمام اصول اخلاقی ست که سالها به عنوان یک معلم برای خود تعیین کرده بودم. من از نگاه خودم معلمی سخاوتمند بودم که می کوشیدم هر آنچه می دانم را بدون هیچ چشم داشتی در اختیار دانشجویان و مخاطبانم قرار دهم. شاهد این ماجرا همین صفحه تلگرام است که همه مطالب، جزوه ها و…
✔️جهت ثبتنام از طریق آیدیهای معرفی شده در پوستر اقدام نمایید @drakbarjabari
باز هم ژیژک: Žižek has once again written something about Iran, but this time in his own defense. Yet he has once more shown that he knows very little about Iran and that his knowledge does not go beyond that of domestic reformist journalists. Linking the state and violence to philosophy was a projection by a group of power-holders and politicians who had been deprived of the spoils of the revolution. They carried o…
✅ دازاینکاوی گروهی (فقط برای اهالی استان گیلان) 🟩 جهت دریافت شرایط حضور به آیدی ذیل در "بله" پیام بدهید: @Daseinsanalysis و یا در تلگرام به آیدی ذیل پیام بدهید: @fardayebeht
✔️ درباره جنگ ✍️ اکبر جباری برای من مخالفت یا موافق بودن با جنگ، امری مهمل و پوچ است، از همینرو، این پرسش که "آیا تو موافق جنگی؟" را هرگز پاسخ نمیدهم. جنگ مانند طوفان است. آیا کسی میپرسد، تو موافق طوفانی!؟ ما آدمهای معمولی در شکلگیری جنگ، همانند وقوع طوفان، هیچ عاملیتی نداریم، و در چیزی یا جایی که هیچ نقش و عاملیتی وجود ندارد، موافقت یا مخالفت چه معنایی دارد؟ آری، میتوان پرسید "تو جنگ را دوست داری یا نه؟" به گمان…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drakbarjabari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@drakbarjabari named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sherwin_vakili · 22,095
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@iransociology · 37,496
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
@vkends · 24,724
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@tarjomaanweb · 45,683
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
@mostafamalekian · 65,709
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
@andiiishe · 33,516
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
@drsargolzaei · 35,895
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@voicepsycology · 30,380
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اکبر جباری” (@drakbarjabari), 3,354 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drakbarjabari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.