Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,666–5,789 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:22
5,775
+2
14 Sept 2026, 02:17
5,773
+8
10 Sept 2026, 02:58
5,765
+14
5 Sept 2026, 00:38
5,751
-3
1 Sept 2026, 07:38
5,754
+1
29 Aug 2026, 04:58
5,753
+6
23 Aug 2026, 08:16
5,747
+4
20 Aug 2026, 00:02
5,743
+4
16 Aug 2026, 18:44
5,739
+33
12 Aug 2026, 21:13
5,706
+21
9 Aug 2026, 13:21
5,685
+2
6 Aug 2026, 20:26
5,683
+3
6 Aug 2026, 07:06
5,680
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,840 reactions across 24 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,274
80.1%
💔
155
5.46%
👌
121
4.26%
👍
85
2.99%
😭
59
2.08%
😢
51
1.80%
💯
27
0.951%
🕊
21
0.739%
👏
14
0.493%
🙏
10
0.352%
🫡
9
0.317%
🤩
8
0.282%
🎉
3
0.106%
👀
2
0.07%
🤬
1
0.035%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,966 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏴 رسول اکرم صلی الله علیه و اله وسلم فرمودند:
فقيهان امين پيامبرانند مادامی که در امور دنيا وارد نشدهاند
عرض شد: يا رسول اللّه ورودشان در دنيا چيست؟
فرمود: پيروى از حاکم و سلطان؛ پس هرگاه چنين كنند بر دين خود از ايشان بترسيد.
قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ( صلى الله عليه و آله ): "الْفُقَهَاءُ أُمَنَاءُ الرُّسُلِ مَا لَمْ يَدْخُلُوا فِي الدُّنْيَا".
قِيلَ: يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، وَ مَا دُخُولُهُمْ فِي الدُّنْيَا؟
قَالَ: "ا…
📛 لا تَسرَعَنَّ إلَی الغَضَبِ فَیَتَسَلَّطَ عَلَیکَ بِالعِادَةِ.
هرگز در خشم گرفتن شتاب مکن؛
چرا که به صورت عادت بر تو مسلّط می شود.
📘تصنیف غررالحکم و دررالکلم / صفحه ۳۰۲ / حدیث ۶۸۷۹
@amirolkalam
🔹 إيّاكَ والجَزَعَ؛ فإنّهُ يَقْطَعُ الأملَ، ويُضْعِفُ العملَ، ويُورِثُ الهَمَّ. واعلَمْ أنَّ المَخْرَجَ في أمرَينِ: ما كانتْ فيهِ حِيلَةٌ فالاحْتِيالُ، وما لَم تكُنْ فيهِ حِيلةٌ فالاصْطِبارُ.
از بيتابى كردن بپرهيز كه اميد را قطع مىكند و كار را به ضعف مىكشاند و اندوه به بار مىآورد.
و بدان كه دو راه نجات بيشتر نيست: يا مشكلى چاره دارد كه بايد چاره انديشى كرد و يا چاره ندارد كه در آن صورت بايد شكيبايى ورزيد.
📗 بحار…
💠 در این روزگار پرتنش، بخوانید توصیف امیرالمومنین از دنیا را ...
سرايى است كه بلا از هر سو گردش را گرفته ... نه خود همواره بر يك حال باشد و نه ساكنانش در امان و سلامت به سر برند. حالاتش گونه گون است و هر روز نوبت به يكى دهد. در آنجا شادمانى نكوهيده است و امن و آسودگى نتوان يافت. مردم دنيا در دنيا چون هدفهايى هستند كه تيرها بر آنها مى بارند. دنيا تيرهايش را بر مردمش مى افكند و به مرگى كه بر سرشان مى فرستد، نابودشان …
💭 اِنَّکمْ اِنِ اغْتَرَرْتُمْ بِالْآمَالِ تَخَرَّ مَتْکم بَوادِرُ الْآجَالِ وَ قَدْ فَاتَتْکمُ الْاَعْمالَ.
اگر فریب آرزوهای دراز را بخورید، هجوم ناگهانی اجل شما را از میان برخواهد داشت،
بدون آن که عملی کرده باشید ...
📕 غررالحکم و دررالحکم/ حدیث3841
@amirolkalam
🌿 دعا کردن را از حضرت امام حسین علیه السلام یاد بگیریم ...
الّلهمَ ارزُقنى الرَغبَةَ فِى الآخِرة، حَتى أعرف صِدقَ ذلكَ فِى قَلبى بالزَهادَة مِنى فِى دُنياى، اللهم ارزقنى بَصَرا فِى أمر الآخِرَة حَتى أطلُبُ الحَسَنات شَوقا، و افر مِن السّيئات خوفا يا رب
خداوندا ؛ شوق به آخرت عطايم كن تا از بى رغبتيم به دنيا صدق آن را بشناسم ، پروردگارا ؛ چشم بصيرت در امر آخرت روزيم فرما تا با شوق، دنبال خوبيها رفته و با خوف، از گناه…
▪️ بی گمان اگر مى دیدید آنچه را كه مردگانتان پس از مرگ دیده اند، بیتابى مى نمودید و وحشت بر شما چیره مى شد؛ گوش به فرمان خدا می سپردید و اطاعتش می کردید.
ولى آنچه مردگانتان پس از مرگ دیده اند، اكنون از چشم شما پنهان است؛ ولی به زودى پرده ها بالا خواهد رفت.
آن حقایق را به شما نیز نشان دادند، ولى دیدن نخواستید ...
و به گوش شما رسانیدند، ولى شنیدن نخواستید ...
و شما را راه نمودند، ولى ره یافتن نخواستید ...
📕 نهج البلاغ…
☀️ عالمُ السِر مِن ضَمائِر المُضمرین و نَجوَی المُتَخافِتین و خَواطِر رَجمِ الظنون ...؛
خدا داناست به هر رازی که مردم در دل نهان داشته اند، و به نجوای آهسته رازگویان و به هر گمان که در خاطری نهفته است ...
@amirolkalam
❤109💯7💔3😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @amirolkalam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@amirolkalam named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@amirolakam named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
شفیعی کدکنی @shafiei_kadkani · 44,420 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
آیت الله فاطمی نیا(رحمه الله) @fateminia · 24,979 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
فردوسیخوانی @readingferdowsi · 31,433 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
آقای ۶ صبح @davodhoseynii · 109,496 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
آرامش (چهلسالگي)... @chehel_salegi · 31,218 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
vkends | مجله ایدهها @vkends · 24,724 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
مولوی و عرفان @MolaviPoet · 28,878 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
موسیقی بیکلام @Bikalam_Nava · 27,692 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
شمس تبریزی و مولانا @ShamsMowlana · 46,416 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
" هوشنگ ابتهاج " @hoshang_ebtehhaj · 82,611 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“امیرالکلام علی علیه السلام” (@amirolkalam), 5,775 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amirolkalam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.