✦ لینک ثبتنام رایگان وبینار “از تحلیل کنکور ۴۰۵ تا طراحی مسیر ۴۰۶” | لینک-» ثبتنام رایگان وبینار
❤12
Signed Melika Ahangar

Channel
@behdasht_sefrtasad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,025subscribers
+407 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002021164686 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @behdasht_sefrtasad |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/behdasht_sefrtasad |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:26 | 6,025 | +92 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:36 | 5,933 | +15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 5,918 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 5,916 | +18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 5,898 | +37 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:21 | 5,861 | +21 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:04 | 5,840 | +10 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:54 | 5,830 | +4 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 23:39 | 5,826 | +9 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:42 | 5,817 | +9 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 01:55 | 5,808 | +14 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 5,794 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 5,786 | +6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 5,780 | +15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 5,765 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 5,752 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 5,744 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 5,732 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:09 | 5,726 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 5,733 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (26 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,085 |
| Reactions total | 365 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 01:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
835 reactions across 45 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 673 | 80.6% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 4.67% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 4.55% | |
| 🙏 | 35 | 4.19% | |
| 😍 | 15 | 1.80% | |
| 🎉 | 13 | 1.56% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.958% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.359% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.359% | |
| 🤓 | 3 | 0.359% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.24% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 835 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (57.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✦ لینک ثبتنام رایگان وبینار “از تحلیل کنکور ۴۰۵ تا طراحی مسیر ۴۰۶” | لینک-» ثبتنام رایگان وبینار
❤12
Signed Melika Ahangar
صفرتاصد | وزارت بهداشت pinned «✅ لیست سوالات خارج از منابع کنکور ۴۰۵ درس روانشناسی بالینی 🔷 سوال شماره ۸ 🔷 سوال شماره ۱۱ 🔷 سوال شماره ۱۲ ◀️ در توضیحات اعتراض به این سوالات میتونید بنویسید: نکته مدنظر سوال در آخرین ویراست منبع یعنی کتاب روانشناسی بالینی فیرس ترجمه مهرداد فیروزیخت…»
کنکور ۴۰۵ تموم شد؛ حالا سؤال اینه که برای ۴۰۶ چه چیزهایی باید تغییر کنه؟ 🧐 از انتخاب منابع گرفته تا برنامهریزی و اولویتبندی درسها، قراره توی یه وبینار رایگان دقیقتر بررسیشون کنیم. 🎓 از تحلیل کنکور ۴۰۵ تا طراحی مسیر ۴۰۶ 📌 تحلیل بودجهبندی و تغییرات کنکور ۴۰۵ 📌 بررسی و اولویتبندی منابع ۴۰۶ 📌 نقشه راه شروع مطالعه از آبان 👨🏻🏫 حسین مرجانی | رتبه ۹ بالینی وزارت بهداشت ۴۰۳ 🎁 هدایای ویژه وبینار: ▫️ نقشه راه مطالعا…
❤26🎉4
Signed Melika Ahangar
صفرتاصد | وزارت بهداشت pinned «عزیزان سلام 🌷 چند ماه اخیر، تقریباً کل وقت و انرژی ما توی کانال «صفر تا صد بهداشت» پای بچههای کنکور ۱۴۰۵ بود؛ کنکوری که واقعاً شبیه هیچکدوم از سالهای قبل نبود. 💔 همینجا به تکتک کنکوریهای ۱۴۰۵ یه خستهنباشید حسابی میگم. شماها تو یک سال گذشته، با توجه…»
✅ منبع بعضی از سوالات مبهم 🔷 سوال شماره ۲ - بالینی: پاسخ این سوال رو میشه از صفحه ۹۸ و ۹۹ کتاب بالینی فیرس ویراست نهم استنباط کرد. 🔷 سوال شماره ۲۶ - شخصیت: پاسخ این سوال به طور دقیق در فصل ۱۴ شخصیت شولتز ویراست دوازدهم صفحه ۶۵۳ اومده. 🔷 سوال شماره ۳۹ - شخصیت: این سوال رو هم میشه با توجه به توضیحات کتاب شخصیت شولتز ویراست دوازدهم فصل دوازده صفحات ۵۳۵ و ۵۳۶، پاسخ داد. صفرتاصد | وزارتبهداشت
❤8
Signed Hossein Marjany
☝️🏻عزیزان به این سوالات میتونید اعتراض بزنید، اما یکسری سوال دیگه هم برامون فرستاده بودید که این موارد هم خارج از منبع هستش(که در واقع خارج از منبع نیست) من در ادامه آدرس دقیق این سوالات رو هم براتون میفرستم اگر خواستید میتونید چک کنید. ◀️ اگر سوال دیگه هست که به نظرتون کلیدش اشتباه هستش یا خود سوال خارج از منبع هستش برامون بفرستید چک کنیم🌷 و اما آدرس سوالاتی شاید فکر کنید خارج از منبع هستن👇🏻
❤9
Signed Hossein Marjany
✅ لیست سوالات اشتباه در کنکور ۴۰۵ درس فیزیولوژی 🔷 سوال شماره ۷۷: ◀️ این سوال از نظر طراحی مشکل داره میتونید در توضیح اعتراض با ثبت دقیق آدرس منبع اینو بنویسید: با توجه به آدرس ذکر شده تمامی گزینه های این سوال با متن منبع در تعارض یا تناقض مستقیم است. منبع: کتاب روانشناسی فیزیولوژیک محمد کریم خداپناهی - ویراست سوم - فصل یازده صفحه ۲۷۳ صفرتاصد | وزارتبهداشت
❤5🔥2
Signed Hossein Marjany
✅ لیست سوالات خارج از منابع کنکور ۴۰۵ درس روانشناسی بالینی 🔷 سوال شماره ۸ 🔷 سوال شماره ۱۱ 🔷 سوال شماره ۱۲ ◀️ در توضیحات اعتراض به این سوالات میتونید بنویسید: نکته مدنظر سوال در آخرین ویراست منبع یعنی کتاب روانشناسی بالینی فیرس ترجمه مهرداد فیروزیخت ویراست ۹ وجود ندارد. درخواست میشود که سوالات ذکر شده در کلید نهایی حذف شوند. آمار و روش تحقیق 🔷 سوال شماره ۱۱۳ ◀️ در توضیحات اعتراض به این سوال هم میتونید بنویسید:…
❤11
Signed Hossein Marjany
✅ شیوه ثبت اعتراض ◀️ ابتدا وارد لینک زیر میشید و کد ملی رو وارد میکنید با همچین فرمی مواجه میشید لینک: https://payeh2.sanjeshp.ir/public/eteraz.aspx?selectedazmoonID=4051001 ◀️ اگر لینک بالایی مشکل داشت ابتدا وارد صفحه اصلی سایت سنجش پزشکی - بخش کارشناسی ارشد بشید بعد روی گزینه فرم درخواست بررسی کلیک کنید: https://sanjeshp.ir/Content.aspx?click=1 ◀️ توجه کنید که برای هر سوال یکبار باید این فرم رو کامل و ثبت کنید.…
❤11
Signed Hossein Marjany
در مورد اعتراض به سوالات و اینکه آیا مفیده اعتراض بزنیم یا نه؟
❤10👍6
Signed Hossein Marjany
عزیزان سلام 🌷 چند ماه اخیر، تقریباً کل وقت و انرژی ما توی کانال «صفر تا صد بهداشت» پای بچههای کنکور ۱۴۰۵ بود؛ کنکوری که واقعاً شبیه هیچکدوم از سالهای قبل نبود. 💔 همینجا به تکتک کنکوریهای ۱۴۰۵ یه خستهنباشید حسابی میگم. شماها تو یک سال گذشته، با توجه به اتفاقاتی که تو کشورمون افتاد، خبرهای بد و حال و هوای سنگینی که همه داشتیم، فشار و اضطراب چندبرابری رو تحمل کردید. واقعا درس خوندن و تمرکز کردن تو این شرایط، چن…
❤69👍3🙏2
Signed Hossein Marjany
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤17
Signed Hossein Marjany
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @behdasht_sefrtasad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@behdasht_sefrtasad edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 3 posts on @behdasht_sefrtasad as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صفرتاصد | وزارت بهداشت” (@behdasht_sefrtasad), 6,025 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/behdasht_sefrtasad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.