19 measurements spanning 20 days, net +72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,121–14,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 22:24
14,204
+3
26 Aug 2026, 21:14
14,201
-1
25 Aug 2026, 23:17
14,202
+3
25 Aug 2026, 02:22
14,199
+11
23 Aug 2026, 18:54
14,188
+5
22 Aug 2026, 04:27
14,183
+9
19 Aug 2026, 20:34
14,174
+3
18 Aug 2026, 18:34
14,171
-7
17 Aug 2026, 16:35
14,178
+8
16 Aug 2026, 14:18
14,170
+4
14 Aug 2026, 21:25
14,166
+2
13 Aug 2026, 12:16
14,164
+3
12 Aug 2026, 14:15
14,161
+3
11 Aug 2026, 14:25
14,158
+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:06
14,157
+6
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
14,151
+10
8 Aug 2026, 18:22
14,141
+9
8 Aug 2026, 00:00
14,132
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:50
14,132
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.27%
avg views ÷ 14,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
606
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.197%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
52 (9 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
20,615
Reactions total
26
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
2
Videos
28
Links
7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 30s
Average length
2m 45s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47
67.1%
🔥
23
32.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ کارگاه تخصصی «الفبای رواندرمانگر شدن»
نقشه راه ساختن هویت، تخصص و مسیر حرفهای در رواندرمانی
👤 مدرس: دکتر مصطفی قلاوند
متخصص زوجدرمانی و مشاوره ازدواج و مترجم کتب مطرح زوجدرمانی
📚 سرفصلها:
▫️ شناخت رواندرمانی و رسالت رواندرمانگر
▫️ انتخاب حوزه کاری و رویکرد درمانی
▫️ آشنایی با رویکردها و نظریههای مهم
▫️ مسیر رشد و حرفهای شدن
▫️ مهارتهای موفقیت و اثربخشی در درمان
▫️ مسیر قانونی اخذ مجوز
▫️ طراحی مسیر شغ…
☑️طرح انتخاب رشتهی ۱۴۰۵ آکادمی ایگو آغاز شد☑️
📊 پارسال با یک تیم ۵ نفرهی متخصص آماری، پس از یک پروژهی دادهمحورِ دقیق و چندمرحلهای (کمی و کیفی)، مدلی طراحی کردیم که میتونه برای هر رتبه، واقعبینانهترین و بهترین انتخابها رو پیشنهاد بده؛ کاملاً مبتنی بر داده، نه حدس و شنیدهها✅
جزئیات طرح انتخاب رشته:
📊 تحلیل آماری انتخابهای سالهای گذشته (براساس فرمهای انتخاب رشته با رتبه و نتیجهی قطعی)
📊 مدلسازی احتمال…
بر اساس نظریه کارل ، مراجع تحت چه شرایطی شروع به تجدید نظر در خود می کند؟
وقتی دچار شکست روانی می شود7%
وقتی در شرایط اضطراب قرار می گیرد15%
در شرایط پذیرش مثبت مشروط20%
در شرایط پذیرش مثبت غیر مشروط58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @Closeup_test. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 36 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
علت ایجاد اضطراب از نظر راجرز ناتوانی در کدام یک از موارد زیر می باشد؟
دفاع های فرد در مقابل ناهمنوایی خود پنداره با احساس های شخصی فرد74%
دفاع های فرد در مقابل هجوم افکار ناخودآگاه به خودآگاهی10%
دفاع های فرد در کنترل تکانه ها و غرایز جنسی4%
دفاع های فرد در مقابل فشارها و استرس های محیطی12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 933,626 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کلوزآپ روانشناسی @Closeup_psychology · 68,966 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
زبان عمومی ارشد و دکتری @RMS_English · 52,081 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
insight(کنکور ارشد روانشناسی) @insightAcademia · 52,875 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کلوزآپ تست ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی” (@Closeup_test), 14,204 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Closeup_test.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
