12 measurements spanning 29 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,880–8,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 21:19
8,909
+14
31 Aug 2026, 07:38
8,895
+6
28 Aug 2026, 17:46
8,889
-1
25 Aug 2026, 09:03
8,890
+4
22 Aug 2026, 11:03
8,886
-1
19 Aug 2026, 05:52
8,887
-7
16 Aug 2026, 09:05
8,894
+3
12 Aug 2026, 22:58
8,891
-4
9 Aug 2026, 20:52
8,895
+6
6 Aug 2026, 20:20
8,889
+5
6 Aug 2026, 03:00
8,884
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
8,884
first reading
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.13%
avg views ÷ 8,909 subscribers
Avg views / post
635
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 97 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
97 (26 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
43,203
Reactions total
970
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,316 reactions across 93 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
962
73.1%
🔥
145
11.0%
👍
85
6.46%
👏
51
3.88%
🙏
24
1.82%
🤔
16
1.22%
💯
12
0.912%
👌
11
0.836%
🥰
10
0.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,316 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
طبیعت اخلاقی نیست؛ تاملی فلسفی درباره سیل نپال،کارمای جمعی،طوفان نوح و راز فجایع بزرگ طبیعی.
وقتی سیل، باورهای ما را با خود میبرد
گاهی یک تصویر، بیش از هزار کتاب فلسفه سؤال در ذهن انسان ایجاد میکند.
تصاویر سیل ویرانگر نپال در تابستان ۲۰۲۶ دقیقاً از همین جنس بودند؛ دیوارهای از آب، گل، سنگ و یخ که در چند دقیقه روستاها را بلعید، پلها را از جا کند و هزاران انسان را به کام خود کشید یا ناپدید کرد. بسیاری از کسانی که …
با توجه به سیل ویرانگر نپال و انتشار صحنه های وحشتناک که یاد آور طوفان نوح بود و کشته و مفقود شدن هزاران انسان این سوال مطرح میشه که طبیعت تا چه حد اخلاقی است ؟ طبیعت چقدر خنثی هست ؟ آیا طبیعت ما را قضاوت و داوری می کند ؟ آیا ما چیزی به نام کارمای سیاره ای داریم ؟ چرا انسان دچار فجایع بزرگ می شود ؟ چرا باید خشک و تر باهم بسوزند ؟ چرا طبیعت در فجایع بزرگ نیک و بد را تفکیک نمی کند و خنثی است ؟ اینکه گفته می شود در گذش…
اتاق تاریک شد و حس کردم دارم سقوط میکنم. از روی غریزه بازوی لاما را گرفتم و او دستش را دور شانههایم انداخت. چیزی نیست لوبسانگ، تو واقعاً سقوط نمیکنی، فقط مغزت دارد تغییر میکند تا بعد چهارم را بپذیرد.
حالا حس سقوط متوقف شده بود و خود را ایستاده در دنیایی به شدت ترساننده یافتم. جانوران غولپیکری آنجا بودند که زشتیشان دستکم هر آنچه را که تا به حال دیده بودم میزد. موجودات عظیمی رد میشدند و با زشتترین صدای ممکن د…
بنابراین همان کار را کردم، اما واقعاً به نظرم فکر بسیار احمقانهای میآمد. چرا یک نفر باید از یک تکه فلزِ خمیده استفاده کند تا غذا را به دهانش ببرد؟ این دیوانهوارترین چیزی بود که تا به حال شنیده بودم، اما ماجرا از این هم بدتر شد: «حالا بخشِ مقعر و گودِ چنگال را ببر زیرِ یکی از آن تخممرغها و بعد با کارد طوری برش بزن که حدود یکچهارم تخممرغ روی چنگال قرار بگیرد. سپس آن را به سمت دهانت میبری و میخوری.»
از لاما پرس…
با این حال استاد، من منطق این کار را درک نمیکنم. منظورم این است که آدم فکر میکند یک موجودِ والا وارد بدنی میشود که تازه به دنیا آمده است، نه اینهمه دردسر و سرکلهزدن با اجسادی که مثل زامبی هستند!
لوبسانگ، کمی با عقل خودت فکر کن. یک نوزاد چند سال زمان نیاز دارد تا اصلاً چیزی یاد بگیرد؛ باید به مدرسه برود، زیر بار انضباط و تربیت والدین قرار گیرد و اینها واقعاً تلف کردن وقت است. شاید سی یا چهل سال از زمان را هدر بد…
❤21🔥2
Signed Mehr01
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @thelostbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@thelostbook edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دنياى گمشده @lostworldss · 33,163 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
دنیای ناشناخته @wonderfullllll · 35,918 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
کتب @cotob · 61,147 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
برترین کتابها @bartarinbookk · 32,435 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @Spirit_and_life · 37,844 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
جهانهای موازی™ @Parallel_WORLDS · 31,328 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
⚖️ DNA_Pluse⚖️ @dnapluse · 29,006 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
روانشناسی (پذیرش) @PAZIRESH_LIFE · 36,533 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
آنتی ایلومیناتی @antiluminati · 32,030 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کتاب گمشده” (@thelostbook), 8,909 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thelostbook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
