Channel
@maqze_kasif
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,016subscribers
-273 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001008497258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maqze_kasif |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maqze_kasif |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 22,016 | -16 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 22,032 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 22,045 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 22,053 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 22,058 | -12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 22,070 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 22,079 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 22,093 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 22,106 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:27 | 22,117 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 22,124 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 22,141 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 22,148 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 22,160 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 22,167 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 22,178 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 22,182 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 22,192 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 22,200 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 22,208 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
569 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 418 | 73.5% | |
| 👍 | 146 | 25.7% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.879% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 569 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اریک فروم میگفت: «عشق یک احساس صرف نیست؛ یک هنر است..» و مثل هر هنر دیگری، انضباط میخواهد، فهم میخواهد، تمرین میخواهد. برای همین است که خیلیها هیجان را با عشق اشتباه میگیرند. هیجان، آسان است. کششی ناگهانی، چند شب بیخوابی، کمی خیالبافی؛ تمام. اما عشقِ واقعی آنجاست که بعد از فروکشِ شور، هنوز انتخاب میکنی دقیق بمانی، صادق بمانی، و دیگری را نه ابزارِ تسکین، بلکه یک جهانِ مستقل ببینی. آدمِ بیظرفیت، از عشق فقط ق…
❤24👍19
او فکر میکرد که دنیا دچار دردسر شده و فقط هم دو راه حل موجود است، یا آنقدر بخندیم تا منفجر شویم و یا فقط منفجر شویم مردی با کبوتر - رومن گاری @MaQze_kasif
❤14👍4
واسه هیچکس نامحدود نباشید، آدما گیگی دوست دارن. @MaQze_kasif
👍31❤11
@MaQze_kasif
❤14
نوشته بود: «از ریشه غمگینم، میفهمی؟ از ریشه.» یلدا سیدی
❤35👍4
ای لحظاتِ خوش که هنوز از راه نرسیدهاید، آیا نمیشود راهِ کوتاهتری در پیش بگیرید؟ قبل از اینکه دلهایمان فرتوت شوند... نزار قبانی @MaQze_kasif
❤23👍10
وقتی شاملو گفته: «اشکها را پشت لبخندی مخفی میکنیم که خیلی درد میکند، و هیچکس نمیفهمد ما را دردِ همین نفهمیدن میکشد؛ نه زخمها.» دوست داشتم باشم و بهش میگفتم؛ منم همیشه آرزو میکردم یه نفرو شبیه به خودم برای خودم داشتم، همونقدر رفیق، همونقدر همراه، همونقدر صبور، که میتونستم باهاش خیلی راحت درد و دل کنم...
❤40👍7
اگر کسی خصوصیتی را در حد کمال داشته باشد به فکرش خطور نمیکند که آن را به معرض نمایش بگذارد. نعلی که صدا میکند حتما یک میخ کم دارد.» در باب حکمت زندگی آرتور شوپنهاور @MaQze_kasif
❤39👍13
امشب که سرت رو روی بالش میذاری، یادت باشه همهچیز لازم نیست همین امروز درست شده باشه. تو به اندازهی تلاشی که کردی، به اندازهی نفسهایی که کشیدی و ادامه دادی، کافی هستی #Gn @MaQze_kasif
❤38👍4👎1
فیلم هایی که یه کوچولو حالتو بهتر میکنن❤️ Mamma Mia! (۲۰۰۸) یه فیلم موزیکال شاد با آهنگهای گروه ABBA. پر از رنگ و حال خوب. Paddington (۲۰۱۴) ماجرای خرس کوچولوی مهربونی که وارد لندن میشه. ساده، بامزه و دوستداشتنی. Julie & Julia (۲۰۰۹) درباره آشپزی، رویاها و دنبال کردن علاقهها. حس زندگی و انگیزه میده. @MaQze_kasif
❤6👎1
وقتی میخواهید به گنجشکی غذا بدهید فرار میکند چرا که می داند آزادی با ارزش تر از نان است @MaQze_kasif
👍21❤13
ترس از درد نیست؛ ترس از اینه که اونقدر بمونی تا دیگه نپرسـی... فراموش نکنید مرگ، بزرگترین باخت زندگی نیست؛ بزرگترین باخت؛ آرزوها و چیز هایی هستند که درون ما میمیرند درحالی که هنوز زنده هستیم The Lord of The Rings
❤19👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maqze_kasif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☄️Maqze Kasif☄️” (@maqze_kasif), 22,016 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maqze_kasif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.