Get your free NFT Domain from Cloudflare Wallet I just reserved my own Cloudflare Wallet domain, a simple and recognizable digital identity designed for the next generation of Web3. Instead of relying on long wallet addresses, you can use a personal name that represents you across the Cloudflare Wallet ecosystem, where wallets, digital identity, and AI-powered experiences come together. Cloudflare is one of the wo…

Channel
WEB-3 Airdrops
@tapswap_code_daily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
95,470subscribers
-5,417 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002222349997 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tapswap_code_daily |
| Description | This Channel is Created to Help miner with their needs, we will provide only 100% verified mining bots. Buy ads:- @Buy_advertisment Offical partner: BingX |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tapswap_code_daily |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 95,470 | -266 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 95,736 | -183 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 95,919 | -214 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 96,133 | -258 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 96,391 | -339 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 96,730 | -367 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 97,097 | -208 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 97,305 | -130 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:48 | 97,435 | -185 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 97,620 | -185 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 97,805 | -186 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 97,991 | -243 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 98,234 | -181 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 98,415 | -38 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 98,453 | -204 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 98,657 | -143 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 98,800 | -360 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 99,160 | -236 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 99,396 | -122 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 99,518 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.64%
- avg views ÷ 95,470 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,560
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (14 June 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,129 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,030
- Videos
- ≈28
- Links
- ≈847
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 18s
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
WHERE THE MARKET STANDS BTC is trading near $78,000 after failing to hold $80K overnight. Total crypto market cap sits around $2.63T. Support: $76,800 to $77,000 Resistance: $80,000 to $81,500 Majors (last session): ETH ~$2,446 | XRP ~$1.37 | SOL ~$103 CONTEXT THAT MATTERS August was Bitcoin's strongest month of 2026, up roughly 24%. US spot BTC ETFs pulled in close to $2 billion in a single week, the best of th…
🚀 Anthony Scaramucci remains bullish on Bitcoin! Scaramucci says Bitcoin will move back above $100,000, describing the current market grind as the tail end of the bear cycle. 🗣️ *“We are still resoundingly bulls on Bitcoin.”* 📈 $100K+ still in sight? #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #BitcoinNews #CryptoNews
🚨 JUST IN: Binance reportedly shared customer data with Moscow that was later used to charge a Russian IT specialist over crypto donations to Ukraine — despite the exchange having exited Russia in 2023, according to Reuters. 📄 The report says investigators used the shared transaction history and identity documents as evidence, while Binance maintains it only responds to lawful law enforcement requests. #Binance #Cr…
🇺🇸 UPDATE: The U.S. Senate has pushed the CLARITY Act vote toward September after entering its August recess. 🏛️ The bill still faces a crucial 60-vote threshold, keeping the future of U.S. crypto regulation uncertain. #Crypto #CLARITYAct #Bitcoin #Regulation
White House Official Patrick Witt says Democrats blocked a vote on the Crypto Clarity Act before summer recess. "If they can't get there by September 15, they never will."
📈 MARKET UPDATE: Bitcoin continues to hold above the $64,000 level as improving macro sentiment supports the crypto market. ⚡ Ethereum remains weaker in comparison, underperforming Bitcoin's recent recovery. #Bitcoin #BTC #Ethereum #Crypto
🔥 JUST IN: NVIDIA, alongside 35+ leading technology companies, has launched the Open Secure AI Alliance (OSAA) to strengthen the security of open-source AI. 🤖🛡️ The alliance aims to develop secure AI standards, promote collaboration across the industry, and enhance the safety and resilience of open-source AI models and infrastructure. 📈 A major step toward building a more secure and trustworthy AI ecosystem. #NVID…
$BTC has a very important resistance on the weekly timeframe. The key level is the 21-week EMA, which is currently located around the $70K area. What makes this zone even more important is that it matches my $69K-$71K resistance area on the daily chart. So if Bitcoin continues this move higher, that range will likely become the main test for bulls.
🚨 JUST IN: Brent crude oil has surged above $95 per barrel for the first time in six weeks. ⛽📈 The rally reflects renewed strength in global oil prices and could have a ripple effect on fuel costs, inflation, and energy markets if the momentum continues. 👀 All eyes are now on whether Brent can sustain its move above the $95 mark. #BrentCrude #Oil #CrudeOil #Markets #Commodities #BreakingNews
🔎 RESEARCH: Tokenized RWAs have grown more than tenfold since early 2024. Excluding stablecoins, just hit ATH at over $33B. But most of that capital is locked behind steep minimums. Some tokenized private credit funds require $500,000 to get in. Some corporate credit deals start at $5M. Does that mean tokenization is out of reach for retail investors? Not at all. In a new report with 8lends, Cointelegraph Research…
🚨 INSIGHT: Peter Brandt tells Ciaran Lyons, "I think we'll see a low in Bitcoin somewhere in early October." He believes Bitcoin could briefly dip into the high $40Ks before the next major move higher, adding: "The Bitcoin cycle has been very, very consistent." #TRADESECRETS
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @tapswap_code_daily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Ensign_Crypto · 15,059#1
@theTapCoins · 2,919,608#2
@mediarussia · 1,694,028#3
@hamster_digest · 391,416#4
@autoruss · 833,622#5
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,498,015#6
@TheFootballCity · 267,464#7
@odes_ai · 353,076#8
@Dune_Part_Three_Dune3 · 79,494#9
@Love_In_The_Clouds_Eng_Sub · 15,115#10
@gameechannel · 1,901,951#11
@gemz_combo_daily · 118,682#12
@TaskNChannel · 912,667#13
@Fairdrop888 · 2,999#14
@watbird · 1,476,557#15
@combobestchannel · 215,776#16
@MJAirdropHunter · 3,694#17
@RynoxTrades · 29,415#18
@dogs · 7,065,215#19
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#20
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#21
@theyescoin · 5,697,036#22
@tomarket_ai · 6,657,802#23
@notcoin · 8,643,687#24
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#25
@seedupdates · 8,226,508#26
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#27
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#28
@fx_holding_community · 6,083,788#29
@realgoats_channel · 4,674,136#30
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#31
@boomloudcoin · 1,671,644#32
@dotcoincommunity · 3,977,366#33
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,296,110#34
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#35
@banana_update · 1,401,181#36
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#37
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#38
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#39
@monorixofficial · 1,336,669#40
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,531,077#41
@hexnio · 1,998,607#42
@onus_globalchannel · 1,650,302#43
@gram · 6,689,636#44
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#45
@token_1win · 2,980,801#46
@therealyescoin · 2,089,882#47
@iamalexfalcon · 3,088,378#48
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,136,037#49
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#50
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#51
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#52
@CryptoKingKeyur · 669,389#53
@KeyGen_Channel · 186,797#54
@catgoldminerann · 904,797#55
@cultofnot · 1,027,411#56
@durov · 10,721,399#57
@nomis_protocol · 1,549,523#58
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#59
@vestirussia · 986,059#60
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,191,483#61
@money · 2,974,351#62
@builders · 3,431,951#63
@Birds_announcement · 1,542,772#64
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,519,917#65
@cryptoranknews · 678,604#66
@metazoneofficial · 564,077#67
@boopupdates · 1,309,924#68
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#69
@babydogecoin · 1,019,704#70
@smpl_app · 1,619,786#71
@theYescoin_News · 328,519#72
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,026,567#73
@mastercryptohq · 268,657#74
@CloutCoinSol · 965,464#75
@ShamsTabraiz · 134,814#76
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,084,828#77
@EraOfExplorers · 715,471#78
@avagoldcoin · 1,753,173#79
@tons_base · 486,041#80
@RidingExtreme · 207,458#81
@CherryTrendingEVM · 857,790#82
@WagmiHub_News · 1,082,622#83
@battle_games_com · 2,693,947#84
@catizenann · 3,581,173#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@combathamstercipher · 28,800
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 September 2026
@RynoxTrades · 29,415
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
@kelvolutionist · 69,739
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WEB-3 Airdrops” (@tapswap_code_daily), 95,470 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tapswap_code_daily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.