Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WARHOL

Channel

WARHOL

@warhol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,490subscribers

-414 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001128351581
TypeChannel
Username@warhol
Created14 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/warhol

Growth

26,49026,90426,6976 August 2026 — 26,904 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,899 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,895 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,876 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,855 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,830 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,773 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,749 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,720 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,686 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,650 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,619 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,608 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,600 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,569 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,559 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,532 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,527 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,502 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,494 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,490 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -414. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,428–26,966 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 23:5626,490-4
27 Aug 2026, 21:2326,494-8
27 Aug 2026, 00:2926,502-25
26 Aug 2026, 02:3826,527-5
25 Aug 2026, 00:1326,532-27
23 Aug 2026, 11:5426,559-10
21 Aug 2026, 20:0726,569-31
20 Aug 2026, 13:5326,600-8
19 Aug 2026, 12:0226,608-11
18 Aug 2026, 10:4326,619-31
17 Aug 2026, 10:4426,650-36
15 Aug 2026, 19:3326,686-34
14 Aug 2026, 09:2626,720-29
13 Aug 2026, 04:1426,749-24
12 Aug 2026, 07:0726,773-57
11 Aug 2026, 04:3726,830-25
10 Aug 2026, 06:4726,855-5
9 Aug 2026, 05:5126,860-16
8 Aug 2026, 06:5326,876-19
7 Aug 2026, 08:0326,895first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 26,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,820
91 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 90 of 91 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held92 (2 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total529,320
Reactions total10,950
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 26s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,405 reactions across 86 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,77255.5%
🔥6686.42%
💔6195.95%
👎4794.60%
👍3863.71%
🕊3783.63%
🤯3133.01%
💯3052.93%
❤‍🔥2962.84%
😈2011.93%
🥰1891.82%
😢1161.11%
🤔1151.11%
🤝1000.961%
🤪960.923%
🤬690.663%
😨550.529%
🤩530.509%
👻340.327%
🌭300.288%
11 further kinds1311.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,950reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 91 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @warhol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,720 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Кто ждет GTA 6? Мнение о тизере геймплея Помню, в нулевых батя допустил к компу, чтобы я делал музыку, а я нашел у него GTA 3 и все время, которое надо было посвятить музыке, проиграл в GTA. Потом уже на своем компе играл в GTA San Andreas, там на каком-то месте зависло, и больше с комп-играми я дело не имел очень долго. В 2019 году случайно поменял мониторные колонки на PS4, и вот наконец-то выдалась возможность п

21🔥2🤝1

28 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,860 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Интернет против Анны Виленской Забавно наблюдать как Анна Виленская столкнулась с массовым хейтом. Сначала от музыковедов, которые раскритиковали ее курс, затем вишенкой на торте стал очень крутой видос Михаила Красненкера «Что не так с Анной Виленской». Анна стала известна благодаря своим лекциям на ютьюбе, там она с академическим флером анализировала простую и сложную поп-музыку. Для обывателя выглядело очень инт

32😈8👍4🌭1

27 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈4,090 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ken Carson выпустил релиз на полтора часа, вот это XPERIMENT Фиты с Playboi Carti, 2hollis, Lil Uzi Vert, Yung Thug. Кажется, что не хватает только Лил Уэйна. Звучит круто, но 36 треков? Можно было и 4 обойтись. Мнение в комменты: PS подписчики объяснили, что такой длинный, потому что делюкс. Spotify

43🤔4🤯3🌚2🌭1

27 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈3,890 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Мумбайский андеграунд, или что было бы, если бы Mujuice оказался индусом в Лондоне Рэп не в моде, сейчас в прайме музыка электронная. Как по мне, самый свежий соус раздают именно челы, которые вдохновляются хайперпопом и креативно его видоизменяют. Например, the sound chulk makes. Он поет как инди певец из начала десятых, а его музыка звучит как смесь синтипопа и хайперпопа. Мне его треки вкатили нереально. Кстати

36👍4❤‍🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,780 views89 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Единственный способ не воровать в творчестве. Часть 3 Про проблему русской музыки. В России популярна «эстрадная песня», она постепенно меняет форму, но одинаково уверенно держится уже лет 50 в топе. Это песня о самых простых человеческих чувствах, когда кто-то кого-то любит, но не взаимно, или теряет, что-то такое. Одинаковые аккорды, одинаковые слова, схожие мелодии, и всё это тянется очень давно. Таков жанр. Со

58🤓15🕊11👎3😢2

26 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,850 views73 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Единственный способ не воровать в творчестве Последнее время творческие люди любых профессий всё чаще обращаются к культуре референса. Надо сделать хит? Давай референс! Надо сделать фотосессию? Давай референс! Надо составить лук? Давай референс! Будто бы без референса вообще нельзя двинуться или сделать что-то стоящее. А что такое нужда в референсе? Это желание простым способом подукрасть или скопировать уже кем-то

53🕊10💯5👎3🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈4,370 views54 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сравниваем музыкантов с брендами одежды. Хаски — Адидас, Редо — кодред, Asap Rocky — Supreme. Пишем имя вашего любимого музыканта и каким бы он брендом мог быть.

32👎9🤨8🤪2❤‍🔥1👍1🕊1

26 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈4,800 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Эксперименты от SABU? Дайте два Про SABU я пишу регулярно. Сначала были «Обои», потом ее партия в «Motor Club», «Агентство насилия» и креативные визуалы, которые она вообще не умеет делать скучно. Короче внимательно слежу. И 11 сентября будет еще один повод. SABU станет хедлайнером шоукейса BandLink на ИМИ Фестивале. Вместе с ней в «Ровеснике» сыграют Ник Ждан и «Один в оленьем парке» — группа, которая решила скрес

🥰1511🔥5👎2❤‍🔥1🕊1

26 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC≈4,900 views87 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Кай Энжел и Майс уже олдскул? Или еще свежие игроки? Все-таки 3 года прошло.

❤‍🔥66💔152🐳1👎1🕊1🤪1

25 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC≈5,370 views150 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Подписчики Warhol лайками предсказали отмену концертов Канье Уэста. Воспитал рациональное мышление!!

135💔11🤪2👻1🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈5,520 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Слушать только популярных артистов скучно, только ноунеймов — подозрительно. Яндекс Музыка вернула персональные итоги лета. Из моего топ-10 получилась фестивальная афиша и судя по ней, я где-то посередине. Показывайте свои.

71🕊6🤯2❤‍🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈6,120 views309 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Егор Летов передает привет с дачи. Последняя неделька, потом в город!

209🥰45🔥33😢9👍6🕊4👨‍💻3

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @warhol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@warhol edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 124,880 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Flow
@superslowflow · 48,766
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Тихое Место
@thequietplace · 51,429
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Русский шаффл
@rushuffle · 43,944
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Сломанные пляски
@brokendance · 80,382
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
STUDIO 21
@studio21ru · 44,952
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
No Cap
@nocap · 55,599
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
Ö News
@omanko_news · 47,764
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 114,510
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WARHOL” (@warhol), 26,490 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warhol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.