Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for биг бэйби тейк

Channel

биг бэйби тейк

@bigbabytake

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,325subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002050232560
TypeChannel
Username@bigbabytake
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bigbabytake

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3252,3572,3416 August 2026 — 2,356 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,356 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,355 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,353 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,347 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,345 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,344 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,345 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,343 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,334 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,328 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,325 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,320–2,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:182,325-3
13 Sept 2026, 15:202,328-6
9 Sept 2026, 16:012,334-9
3 Sept 2026, 21:372,343-2
31 Aug 2026, 14:162,345+1
28 Aug 2026, 21:492,344-1
25 Aug 2026, 16:142,345-2
19 Aug 2026, 06:172,347-6
16 Aug 2026, 05:522,353-2
12 Aug 2026, 23:342,355-1
10 Aug 2026, 07:212,356-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:432,357+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:322,356first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 57s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

663 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28943.6%
🔥548.14%
😁548.14%
💯497.39%
🕊477.09%
🤝375.58%
❤‍🔥304.52%
👍274.07%
🙏192.87%
🤣152.26%
🍾71.06%
🏆71.06%
👌60.905%
👏60.905%
🤔50.754%
🌭30.452%
🥰30.452%
👎20.302%
✍10.151%
💊10.151%
1 further kind10.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 663 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bigbabytake. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC801 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Новый ролик алерт Я родился и жил во Владивостоке, но прекрасно знал про Вешняки, Лефортово, Текстильщики, Выхино и так далее — все потому что много слушал московский андер. Большинство знало про Москву благодаря Гуфу, а я из-за Рыночных Отношений и Черной Экономики. Это была музыка людей, которые забили на такие условности как хорошая студия и оборудование. Они просто собирались на хатах, устраивали движ и писали …

❤26🔥11🥰3

14 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,080 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Москвичи, залетайте на лекцию — редкое событие будет. Москвичи и немосквичи, слушайте наш подкаст про Фьюза — тоже, наверное, нечасто так люди собираются, чтобы поразгонять о рэпе

❤4👏2🕊2

14 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC920 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @arkadybazarishPhoto

«На репите» LIVE в Москве: дискуссия о Хаски Хаски — один из самых заметных русских артистов последних 10 лет. Его масштаб выходит за рамки хип-хопа, а перформансы претендуют на современное искусство. Но творчество Дмитрия Кузнецова вызывает много споров — как у слушателей, так и у критиков. И те, и другие соберутся 18 июля в Москве, чтобы принять участие в дискуссии о Хаски. В Доме Винтажной Музыки встретятся вед…

🔥3✍1❤1👍1🤩1

9 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,190 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Нишевые отсылки в массы

❤21🤣9😁4

4 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,640 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На фоне последних разговоров о Френдли Таге вспомнилось, как я хотел делать с ним интервью после выхода первого прорывного альбома. Мы тогда созвонились, чтобы обсудить идею. Из этого разговора мне запомнились две вещи. Первая, что он сидел далеко от экрана, как будто ему провели телемост. А вторая, что на мою реплику о том, что ему нечего переживать насчет интервью, он ответил: "Да, я вижу, что ты профессионал, вот…

❤31🤝8🤣6💯4😁1

22 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,830 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Хороший альбом, до которого я только сейчас добрался — "1985" Манки Монка. Манки Монк — важный человек для челябинского рэпа, которому не хватило внимания за пределами локальной сцены. Во-первых, он был в оригинальном составе Триагрутрики (и вроде под именем МС Подъезд), а ушел до выхода народного альбома "Вечерний Челябинск". Во-вторых, с человеком по имени Пастор Напас делал группу Taj Mahal, из которой родилась т…

❤17👌6🤝4

9 Jun 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,740 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

В детстве эта реклама взрывала мне мозг. Она была мало похожа на то, что показывали по телеку, а это непонятное зашифрованное "овип локос" прочно въелось мне в подкорку. Была это реклама пива "Сокол", куда почему-то звали русских рэперов старой формации: Купера, Звонкого, ДаБац. Купер спустя годы завяз в алкогольной зависимости и частично из-за нее же скончался — вот такая злая ирония. Я, конечно, тогда не мог знат…

❤‍🔥24❤7🍾7💯4💊1

8 Jun 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,550 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Шел 2026 год, на рэп.ру вышла по всем приметам заказная статья о сыне Децла. Ссылку оставлять не буду, простите. На днях Толмацкий-старший еще и книгу про Децла выпускает — об этом на сайте тоже сообщалось, причем с такими важными редакторскими уточнениями как "отличные новости от Толмацкого в день его 66-летия". Но это еще ладно, просто скопированный пресс-релиз, а вот от заказухи стало немного больно. И даже не з…

💯19😁12❤3🤔3

6 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,560 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Полтора часа болтаем про Фьюза, группу Krec, добрую и недобрую грусть Это вышел подкаст "На репите", который делают Аркадий Романов и Петр Полещук. Звать туда человека с логоневрозом — затея авантюрная, так что большое им спасибо. Разговор живой, прикольный, для погруженных в контекст и из него выпадающих. Я там пытаюсь выдавать какую-то экспертность, но еще сильнее стараюсь более-менее смешно шутить. Если у вас ес…

❤19🔥6👍5

4 Jun 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,370 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nktnpcht

В какой-то момент за просмотром нового видео Кирилла поймал себя на том, что сижу с открытой пачкой: "Чтоооо?! Да не моооожет быть такоооого". Чем достигается такой эффект? Темчто когда сталкиваешься с простым, беспристрастным и лишенным особых эмоций перечислением — "этого рэпера отец бросил в таком-то возрасте, у этого — ушел в другую семью, этого и этого — воспитали мамы, этот отца так и не простил, а этот посвят…

❤12

2 Jun 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,290 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Меня невероятно волнует существование песни "Земля под ногами" группы Центр. Она вышла в 2008 году на альбоме "Эфир в норме". Есть риск, что вы ее включите и вообще ничего не поймете — какие-то дети, какая-то конспирология, Птаха произносит "ментальное содействие" (хотя мне слышится то ли "сукействие", то ли "согействие"). По меркам группы, которая писала про московские будни и мутные замуты, это очень странная пес…

😁28❤9🔥4🤔2

1 Jun 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,280 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Послушал на днях альбом Бразильца и Метокса (хороший). И вот не покидает вопрос. Я не сказать, что внимательный слушатель Метокса, но периодически включал его альбомы — и везде было про тюрьму, причем истории эти вроде как не повторялись. А в этот раз, например, были посттюремные повести. Он их выдумывает? И есть ли у нас второй такой артист, построивший карьеру на колымских рассказах?

💯12😁9🌭3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bigbabytake. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PRNRP
@trap_critics · 29,747
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
WARHOL
@warhol · 27,500
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
а можно потанцевальней?
@bestdjchannel · 40,614
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
The Flow
@superslowflow · 48,840
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Сломанные пляски
@brokendance · 80,370
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Тихое Место
@thequietplace · 51,349
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Хаски
@husky_spgs · 110,621
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“биг бэйби тейк” (@bigbabytake), 2,325 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigbabytake.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.