Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for мама, я продюсер

Channel

мама, я продюсер

@unbrkn495

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,893subscribers

-160 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001161489198
TypeChannel
Username@unbrkn495
Descriptionне отец хипхопа, но как минимум отчим
Created12 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/unbrkn495

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,8778,0537,9656 August 2026 — 8,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,047 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,036 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,038 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,040 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,035 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,980 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,963 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,953 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,944 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,945 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,934 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,938 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,931 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,916 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,910 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,906 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,902 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,896 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,889 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,885 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,886 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,877 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,883 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,893 subscribers7,8936 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,851–8,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:297,893+10
2 Nov 2026, 20:077,883+6
30 Oct 2026, 16:187,877-9
28 Oct 2026, 00:497,886+1
25 Oct 2026, 00:177,885-4
21 Oct 2026, 23:387,889-7
18 Oct 2026, 09:167,896-6
15 Oct 2026, 05:397,902-4
12 Oct 2026, 13:297,906-4
5 Oct 2026, 14:387,910-6
27 Sept 2026, 22:557,916-15
18 Sept 2026, 20:017,931-7
14 Sept 2026, 13:397,938+4
10 Sept 2026, 22:197,934-11
5 Sept 2026, 13:177,945+1
1 Sept 2026, 15:547,944-9
29 Aug 2026, 20:567,953-10
26 Aug 2026, 18:127,963-17
23 Aug 2026, 10:177,980-55
19 Aug 2026, 17:088,035first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 7,893 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held43 (16 April 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total12,443
Reactions total319
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
348
Videos
118
Links
560

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 19s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

744 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545435259753834897868091.4%
😭648.60%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 814 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 43 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unbrkn495. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 April 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 16:07 UTC813 views16 reactionsread 5 November 2026

вот и думайте.

custom 545435259753834897816

2 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,520 views24 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 545435259753834897824

29 Oct 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,460 views56 reactionsread 7 November 2026

отдаваться музыке на 100% = проявлять максимальную искусность в поиске равновесия между предельным усилием и таким же предельным расслаблением.

custom 545435259753834897856

28 Oct 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,650 views108 reactionsread 7 November 2026

те кто понял, что пост выше не про то, что нужно выпускать по синглу каждый месяц поставят реакцию на это сообщение.

custom 5454352597538348978108

26 Oct 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,910 views89 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 545435259753834897889

12 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,650 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

зима близко 1. финальную часть «больше чем шум» переписали уже дважды, и что-то в ней всё равно не нравится. упадёт как упадёт, тащемта. а вы пока почитайте остальные части, если пропустили: • [от лифта до плейлиста] - интро • [как люди перестали слушать музыку]- часть 1 • [как время заставило треки торопиться] - часть 1.5 • [как музыкант стал главным покупателем] - часть 2 2. понятно, что ничего не понятно, но ин…

custom 54543525975383489786

9 Oct 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,780 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026

сегодня день рождения у хорошего профи в концертных делах антона карпекина, а профи мы любим (ну и антона тоже) когда-то он написал для нашего канала эссе «ебаные бумажки» и закончил его так: «чем больше бумажек, тем чище жопа». с тех пор бумажки у него только толстеют = он пишет райдеры для выступлений артистов аж на 56 страниц. а еще лупит всякого рода истории о нашем любимом шапито, вроде той, где продюсеры 90-х…

custom 54543525975383489789

9 Oct 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,660 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @anton_concerts

Почему продюсеры 90-х не докладывали мяса тиграм? Продюсер воспринимается как злодей, который выжмет все соки и заберет себе все деньги артиста. Но если вы спросите продюсера про почти любого подопечного, он скажет: — Без меня они ничего бы не добились. Если же вы зададите тот же вопрос артисту, он ответит: — Все эти продюсеры только наживались на мне и моем таланте. Ты зарабатываешь, потому что мы, артисты, кру…

custom 545435259753834897811

6 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC≈1,900 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

лучший метод продвижения в 2026

custom 545435259753834897835

11 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC≈3,530 views46 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 545435259753834897846

8 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC≈1,880 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

кому подходит работа со мной в первую очередь = тем, кто принимает решения в одиночку. выпускать сейчас или собрать альбом? переделать в шестой раз или отпустить? продолжать старую рекламную компанию или начать новую? тем, у кого одни решения висят неделями, а в правильности других систематически сомневаешься. первый релиз или десятый год - точка одна и та же. тем, кто уже вкладывает в музыку время и деньги и хоч…

custom 545435259753834897812

6 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,560 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @krutoinetVideo

артист: аннушкаа название релиза: аннушкаа формат: альбом дата релиза: 29.05.2026 жанр: blackgaze / dream pop настроение: youtu.be/watch?v=6QD55_DcxrM язык: русский для фэнов: Deafheaven (Рушана + Alcest) описание: выверенное слияние акустического бэкграунда вокалистки с шумным и переменчивым напором группы, первый трек сразу кладёт бенчмарк всего альбома, затем уже по порядку закручивает твоё сознание по задуманны…

custom 545435259753834897810

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @unbrkn495. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @unbrkn495 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
11 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PRNRP
@trap_critics · 29,734
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
ИМИ
@imi_live · 27,412
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
BandLink. СаундЧек
@BandLink · 24,304
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
GAZ
@gazlive · 35,409
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Звук | Музыкальный сервис
@zvuk_sound · 34,404
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
WARHOL
@warhol · 27,436
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
а можно потанцевальней?
@bestdjchannel · 39,834
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Skryptonite
@skryp_tg · 65,909
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
Тихое Место
@thequietplace · 51,204
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Сломанные пляски
@brokendance · 79,746
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“мама, я продюсер” (@unbrkn495), 7,893 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unbrkn495.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.