Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Таня Столяр

Channel

Таня Столяр

@tanyastlr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,220subscribers

+152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003424710521
TypeChannel
Username@tanyastlr
DescriptionМир и жир глазами журналистки, коллекционера, лил писательницы, сценаристки и #культурнойСтоляр из Антиглянца. По всем вопросам @immasterpiece
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tanyastlr

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0687,2867,1776 August 2026 — 7,068 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,068 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,092 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,155 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,199 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,192 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,190 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,167 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,235 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,237 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,223 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,211 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,205 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,277 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,248 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,251 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,211 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,207 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,197 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,286 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,273 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,244 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,234 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,226 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,238 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,220 subscribers7,2206 August 20264 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 90 days, net +152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,035–7,319 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:467,220-18
31 Oct 2026, 21:447,238+12
29 Oct 2026, 05:287,226-8
26 Oct 2026, 09:167,234-10
23 Oct 2026, 12:257,244-29
20 Oct 2026, 14:167,273-13
17 Oct 2026, 06:277,286+89
14 Oct 2026, 07:167,197-10
10 Oct 2026, 16:027,207-4
4 Oct 2026, 16:427,211-40
25 Sept 2026, 02:187,251+3
17 Sept 2026, 00:177,248-29
13 Sept 2026, 04:387,277+72
9 Sept 2026, 01:217,205-6
3 Sept 2026, 17:387,211-12
30 Aug 2026, 23:167,223-14
28 Aug 2026, 04:167,237+2
25 Aug 2026, 08:597,235+68
21 Aug 2026, 23:277,167-23
18 Aug 2026, 20:077,190first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.1%
avg views ÷ 7,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held55 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total10,478
Reactions total203
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 01:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,300
Videos
≈72
Links
≈211

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,789 reactions across 53 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,52090.4%
🤣1244.45%
😱853.05%
🌚541.94%
🤬60.215%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,841 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC668 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Провёл стихийную экскурсию по малой родине - экспериментальному микрорайону Северное Чертаново - для нескольких модных ребят. Необычное место, в каком еще спальнике утром по пути в магазин или на службу можно увидеть культпоход «Гаража», памятную доску Пелевина и людей на лошадях? Инициатором экскурсии была дружественная мне Таня Столяр. Татьяна вообще человек неравнодушный, ей, кажется, интересно всё на свете. Стол…

❤23

4 Nov 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,090 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Какие аудиоподкасты вы слушаете? Мне нужно что-то захватывающее для прогулок с Лотти. Я обычно хожу под шоу про финансы и карьеру «План Б», очень заземлюсь размышления Маши и Ильи (люблю все, что он делает со времен сайта ВОС). Еще под лекции радио Арзамас хорошо гуляется. Накидайте, пожалуйста, своих аудиолюбимок.

❤12

3 Nov 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,390 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @bolotyanpishet

Зачем взрослым людям книжные клубы? Книжному клубу "Триггер" Татьяны Столяр исполнилось полгода - поздравляю! - и это хороший повод поговорить о самом феномене: почему книжные клубы вдруг стали модными? Раньше я посещала совсем другие мероприятия - ридинг-группы, которые были и остаются популярны в художественной и академической среде. Разница между ними, на мой взгляд, существенная. Ридинг-группа - прежде всего ко…

❤18

3 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,340 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Тут издательство ad marginem предлагает выбирать себе книги по обложке для украшательства интерьера. Ну и на всякий добавляет в посте, что книги рекомендуют прочитать. По мне так ну такое, конечно, есть вероятность, что те кто купили для интерьера в итоге Фуко прочитают… А вы что думаете насчет такого подхода? Скрины из запрещенной экстремистской социальной сети.

❤12🤬1

2 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC≈1,490 views35 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Классный постер художника Якова Хомича к фильму Тима Анисимова «Было не было», так сходу и не вспомню, когда современные российские художники последний раз делали афиши к кино.

❤35

2 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,540 views52 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Воскресным утром отправилась на экскурсию по Чертаново, где никогда не была, в сопровождении товарища Игоря Компанийца @vse_kompaniets. Под чутким руководством Игоря я трудилась в журнале Port (он меня туда утвердил) и SNC. Компаниец - больший патриот родного района и прекрасный знаток этого экспериментального города в городе. Любопытная затея района «без машин» (нет сквозных проездов и светофоров), без лишних арома…

❤52

1 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,560 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @bolotyanpishet

Когда я не так давно решила после долгого перерыва посмотреть, что происходит в литературной тусовке, то обнаружила, что она, как и мир современного искусства, состоит из разных группировок. Но в целом всех можно разделить на тех, кто любит Веру Богданову, и тех, кто ей завидует удивляется всеобщей любви к ней. Например, мне попался пост, автор которого сравнивает Веру с Гермионой Грейнджер, а её романы - с пятёркам…

❤26

1 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,400 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Радует, что на встречи «Триггера» все всегда приходят нарядные

❤24

20 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC671 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @ushatavainsidePhoto

Татьяна Столяр. Архетип Ushatava: Женщина с характером «Я всегда считала, что у меня хороший вкус и насмотренность, потому что я много работала в глянцевых журналах. Я постоянно была в фэшн-контенте, даже писала статьи, хотя никогда не была полноценным модным редактором. Многие годы мой гардероб был очень ярким: леопард, питон, змея, тигр, зебра. В каком-то смысле действительно вызывающе. Еще долгое время у меня бы…

❤24

20 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC656 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Рассказала Ushatava про свой стиль и солидность.

❤4

19 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,150 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @moscowbooks_ruPhoto

Дорогие друзья! 15 сентября в 19:00 приглашаем вас на презентацию книги Татьяны Столяр «Я есть жир» Татьяной Столяр — журналистка, писательница, председатель книжного клуба «Триггер», сценаристка, арт-коллекционер и соосновательница проекта «Антиглянец». Татьяна расскажет, как превратила многолетнюю борьбу с лишним весом в междисциплинарный проект на стыке литературы и современного искусства. В книге «Я есть жир» …

❤24

19 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,020 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026

У меня будет презентация книги «Я есть жир» в самом любимом большом книжном «Москва» на Тверской! 15 сентября, в 19:00, регистрируемся, а я пошла расписывать руку для автографов.

❤22

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @tanyastlr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Таня Столяр” (@tanyastlr), 7,220 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanyastlr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.