Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for iGutsal

Channel

iGutsal

@igutsal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

12,029subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001066486839
TypeChannel
Username@igutsal
Created11 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/igutsal

Growth

12,02912,07312,0515 August 2026 — 12,061 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,062 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,062 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,060 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,056 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,050 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,046 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,069 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,061 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,058 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,059 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,067 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,063 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,064 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,071 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,069 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,067 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,064 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,057 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,056 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,054 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,057 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,055 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,049 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,039 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,029 subscribers5 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,022–12,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 15:5612,029-10
5 Sept 2026, 09:4012,039-10
3 Sept 2026, 09:3212,049-6
2 Sept 2026, 00:0412,055-2
31 Aug 2026, 23:4812,057+3
30 Aug 2026, 23:3512,054-2
28 Aug 2026, 23:1412,056-1
28 Aug 2026, 01:4512,057-7
27 Aug 2026, 02:2812,064-3
25 Aug 2026, 23:4712,067-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:1412,069-2
23 Aug 2026, 06:3612,071+1
21 Aug 2026, 17:5612,070+6
20 Aug 2026, 12:0312,064+1
19 Aug 2026, 10:0312,063-4
18 Aug 2026, 06:4312,067+8
17 Aug 2026, 09:4512,059+1
15 Aug 2026, 19:0612,058-3
14 Aug 2026, 06:3812,061-12
13 Aug 2026, 01:3812,073first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.8%
avg views ÷ 12,029 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,040
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.634%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held52 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total265,200
Reactions total1,681
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,624 reactions across 50 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79730.4%
😁71627.3%
🔥34613.2%
💔1927.32%
🌚1134.31%
😢843.20%
🙈692.63%
👍632.40%
👀471.79%
🍾411.56%
🤬371.41%
😱240.915%
💘190.724%
🤯180.686%
❤‍🔥160.61%
🤷‍♂120.457%
🕊70.267%
💯60.229%
🥰60.229%
👌50.191%
3 further kinds60.229%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,830 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 52 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @igutsal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,260 views44 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ждёте завтра полный хохотач в соцсетях?

😁21🌚11🙈10🤬2

2 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,470 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Поиск для ИИ-агентов и привлеченные 26 миллионов долларов финансирования: Андрей Стыскин, один из моих бывших руководителей по Яндексу, экс-глава Яндекс Поиска, запустил стартап Keenable. Это снова поисковая система, но не для людей, а для чат-ботов с искусственным интеллектом на базе 100 миллиардов документов. Сейчас в его компании всего 15 человек, но она уже привлекла довольно мощные инвестиции от фондов и пары б

14🔥5👍3

1 Sept 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,800 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @m0pmemPhoto

а что из этого отличные новости?

😁34🌚71👀1

1 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC≈2,340 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

У бренда «585 Золотой» смешной мерч ко Дню знаний — оберег от родительских собраний (сегодня отдают за полцены)

😁256💔1

31 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈4,040 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Интереснейшая история разыгрывается в Штатах, где пытаются вернуть Twitter. Группа энтузиастов во главе с бывшим юристом платформы открыла сайт twitter-com и собирает донаты на возвращение легенды (ранний доступ к проекту стоит 20 баксов). Маск уже судится со стартаперами, но всё дело в том, что при переименовании соцсети в Х, команда отказалась от таких торговых марок, как Twitter и Tweet. Как бы там ни было, непри

23🔥6

30 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈2,130 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Предложение руки и сердца на концерте — уже какой-то must have любого выступления, вот и на ЧТИВО ФЕСТЕ один из зрителей вручает своей любимой кольцо, и девушка говорит «да» аккурат перед исполнением трека «Хлопья летят наверх». Воспоминания, которые у пары останутся на всю жизнь. А реакцию публики запечатлел Диск-кэм от Яндекс 360 — аналог Kiss cam, только вместо смущённых поцелуев — живые эмоции. Яндекс 360 вообще

25🔥11❤‍🔥7👍3

28 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈2,560 views98 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @aaamagazinePhoto

Наконец Дукалис и Дукалис встретились 🙃

🔥53😁32121

27 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈3,010 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Лучший фуршет эвер: вчера на премьере сериала Олдскул в школе 498 раздавали вкус детства — пиццулю и сосиски в тесте, — пока отдельные заучки писали настоящий диктант с Ефимом Шифриным (в свои 70 красавчик вообще). Отдельное уважение организаторам (Premier и Start), каким-то чудом уболтали Минобр на такую тусовку. Знаю, как это непросто вообще (сам снимал пилот школьного сериала в ДК). В это же время коллеги из Дзен

24🔥9💘6🌚1😁1😢1

26 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC≈2,800 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Админы, не дожидаясь особых приглашений (как в случае с Максом), пошли осваивать WB Chat

😁134🔥3🌚1

26 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈2,690 views50 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

«Сплетни от Энти». #говорятчто одна звезда категории А++, растерявшая после одного мероприятия свой капитал, чуть было снова не ворвалась в телеэфиры. Ее утвердили на внутреннем кастинге в шоу большого развлекательного канала. Но… служба безопасности холдинга поменяла все планы, эфиров как не было, так и не будет.

😢31👀86🌚5

25 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈2,740 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Панда Фрайди теперь космический диджитал-амбассадор канала Пятница! Судя по кадрам нового промо-ролика, полёт прошёл успешно. Если кто-то вдруг надумает снова снимать фильм на МКС, главная героиня уже имеется)

🔥16🌚7💘5😢21❤‍🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈10,200 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Six Seven возглавил рейтинг мемов полугодия, перебив черемшу с бурмалдой. Это все новости к этому часу, оставайтесь с нами.

13😁8🌚1🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @igutsal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

монитор
@digitalsru · 30,761
4 posts
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,967
2 posts
Yandex лента
@yandexrussla · 17,467
2 posts
Авито истории
@avitorussla · 3,150
1 post
Бал дебютанток
@baldebut · 22,719
1 post
Мамка блогеров
@bloggers_mama · 20,019
1 post
БП онлайн
@bponline · 100,607
1 post
Дорогой дневник
@dorogoy_dnevnik2 · 1
1 post
КРУТВЕРТ и Кино 🎬
@fedorova_tatyana_vladimirovna · 39
1 post
Ведущий Фуд-блогер
@foodblogger · 62,814
1 post
СчастливыеИстории
@happytopstories · 20
1 post
Во-первых, это красиво!
@hellobeautygirl · 14,215
1 post
что-то в глаз попало
@in_my_eye · 17
1 post
Кейт Бланш
@kate_blanche · 319,945
1 post
В КонТЭКсте
@konkurskontekst · 201
1 post
Скромное Обаяние Пацана
@kukan_sportif · 38,221
1 post
Макс с парковки
@maksme · 572
1 post
НЕПРОЗАМУЖ
@mortalbeauty · 46,714
1 post
МТС
@MTCmob · 6
1 post
Телега⚡️Новости
@novosti_telega · 9,694
1 post
Парфун репостит и не только
@parfun_online · 348
1 post
Легенда цирка
@RetardFrog · 161
1 post
Щевелёв
@schevelev · 1,056
1 post
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 21,259
1 post
🗯 Костя шарит
@smmtg · 2,621
1 post
Суббота Субботиной
@SubbotinaDasha · 20,906
1 post
Газин Вова
@takoegazin · 911
1 post
Таня Столяр
@tanyastlr · 7,205
1 post
СИНЬКА
@thynk · 71,144
1 post
Too much social
@toomuchsocial · 135
1 post
Твой Digital
@tvoydigital · 19
1 post
Метакратия
@vangelis_project · 24
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 84,218
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!
@hello_galochka · 34,551
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
Миллиарды
@overbillions · 31,382
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Медиавойны
@mediavoyni · 39,483
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
Мужчина, вы куда?
@crisisman · 44,676
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Игромир
@Igromir_cloud · 59,162
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Афиша (издание) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…издания уволились несколько бывших членов команды».{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/igutsal/13357|title=Резюме Евгения Гуцала о ситуации в «Афише…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“iGutsal” (@igutsal), 12,029 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igutsal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.