Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Твой стремный коллаб

Channel

Твой стремный коллаб

@stremreliz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,623subscribers

+113 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001226160488
TypeChannel
Username@stremreliz
Created4 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stremreliz

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,4959,6239,5596 August 2026 — 9,510 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,510 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,509 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,505 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,520 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,508 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,507 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,495 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,502 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,508 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,562 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,618 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,621 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,623 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,476–9,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:599,623+2
13 Sept 2026, 04:169,621+3
9 Sept 2026, 00:179,618+56
3 Sept 2026, 19:599,562+54
31 Aug 2026, 22:169,508+6
28 Aug 2026, 22:449,502+7
26 Aug 2026, 02:459,495-12
23 Aug 2026, 09:159,507-1
20 Aug 2026, 02:029,508-12
16 Aug 2026, 19:189,520+15
13 Aug 2026, 17:159,505-4
10 Aug 2026, 07:489,509-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:469,510no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:049,510first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 9,623 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held37 (27 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total6,398
Reactions total297
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,036 reactions across 37 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49424.3%
💯34717.0%
🔥1999.77%
🌚1979.68%
😢1798.79%
🙏1386.78%
1185.80%
💔954.67%
👍653.19%
🥰613.00%
🤩532.60%
🐳351.72%
😍160.786%
👏150.737%
🎉130.639%
🤔110.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,036 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.70%
1 of 37 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,690
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,890
over 36 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvE2bv2128 July 202628 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC918 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Космоскоу объявила все коллабы. Изучаем. 3го буду там сделаю обзор. Очень жаль, что Мистраль решили не кринжевать по-панковски больше и просто позвать художников. Но все-таки жду от них какого-то прикола. https://t.me/cosmoscowfair/6395

9🙏32💔2

26 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,180 views83 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то лопнул пузырь бренда Viva la Vika, который я считаю великим фэшн-МММ — благодаря инстаграмному маркетингу и этим розовым магазинам людям продавали ужасного вида «цацки» за оверпрайс. 3 года назад мы с коллегой побывали в этом вот магазине в районе Патриарших, который меня поразил — настолько форма не отвечала содержанию. А еще там был мини-кинотеатр для просмотра цифрового арт. Это был прикольный момент.

36🔥18💯17🌚12

25 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,260 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😆Флэшбеки из условного 2012 года поймали у субботу на открытии мужского салона «Парни», с очень специфической концепцией, в которой не обошлось без выдроченного минималистичного дизайна от бюро Kidz и искусства, конечно. ⚔️Миша и Артем, создатели проекта, решили запустить анти-барбершоп: без виски, херитейдж-вайбов в дизайне (кожаные диваны, немного винтажа, вот это все), но с педикюром, коррекцией бровей и прочим —

👍1713💯8🙏7

24 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,330 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Убирайте сервиз!

🌚2210👏9🐳5💔4💯3😢2

23 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC≈1,710 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Говорят, что ЖЖ (Livejournal) пытается вернуть хоть крошку прайма и делает посевы у блогеров). Помните, как у Михаила Елизарова «Ёбаные мощи! Я всё подряд пощу!». А ведь было время, когда именно в жж разворачивались главные события российской арт-сцены. Мало кто помнит, что в 2010 году история про то, как поэт Николай Никифоров спалил художника Илью Трушевского на насильственных действиях сексуального характера висел

37🤩28👍159🙏7💯2

22 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC≈1,850 views46 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ты не бойся ночи, ведь я рядом…нейрослоп, который у меня ассоциируется с русским протухшим пост-интернет-артом с отсылками к эстетике нулевых.

💔25🌚9🙏7💯5

22 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,790 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @novaya_nasmotrennostPhoto

ЧТО ПО УИКЕНДУ? С САШЕЙ ГЕНЕРАЛОВОЙ, HEAD OF DIGITAL В СОБАКА.RU И АВТОРОМ ТГ-КАНАЛА «ТВОЙ СТРЁМНЫЙ КОЛЛАБ». [СПБ] 😍 ярмарка ARS в исторических казармах лейб-гвардии Московского полка очередь на превью была больше, чем на превью Cosmoscow, – и это на ярмарку совсем молодых художников в заброшке. несмотря на то, что не все искусство там достойно внимания, на саму ярмарку посетить нужно обязательно – ради атмосферы,

💯11👍8🔥73🥰21

22 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,260 views31 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Вайб: рисковать жизнью, чтобы попасть в инсту Ольги Львовны с промо нового логотипа MAMM с оммажем на лого «Маски-шоу» и коллабу с Даниилом Величко. Официально (по версии канала) главная коллаборация и ребрендинг августа.

💔1295💯3🙏2

21 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,560 views16 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

Опять гребаный перформанс — Шахри Амирханова, фэшн-кумир, чей нос неделю назад с подачи Сергея Николаевича обсуждали всем фейсбуком. Делает перформанс на открытии магазина IDOL в Петербурге. Нишево, конечно (ну зачем интересного в другой сфере человека подталкивать на эту скользкую дорожку, господа бренд-менеджеры). Хотя есть и хорошие новости — за пультом техно-принц петербурга Тихон Бойко. Теперь не только в Грибое

😍73🤔2🙏21🌚1

19 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC≈1,810 views78 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Почему я считаю, что исследования российского арт-рынка не нужны? Ну ладно, давайте так — они нужны, но невозможны в том виде, в каком пытаются сделать некоторые акторы. Безумству храбрых, как говорится, поем мы песню. Вот выше пост о том, что платформа MyInvest.Art сделала исследование и там в разделе цифр с доходами арт-ярмарок у нас выходит, что локальная петербургская Port Art Fair — самая топовая по выручке и п

4017🙏9🌚4💔3💯3🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,510 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Обожаю исследования российского арт-рынка (нет)!

🐳5

19 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,620 views32 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @sobaka_ruPhoto

⚡️Петербургская Port Art Fair — самая прибыльная арт-ярмарка страны? Такую информацию нашли в отчете платформы MyInvest.Art, который этим летом процитировали несколько авторитетных арт-изданий: Port Art Fair, проект петербургского «Севкабель Порта», — лидер среди российских ярмарок по выручке в 2025 году с приростом 11,1% (780 880 000 рублей против 702 889 000 годом ранее). Вывод сделан на основе открытых данных о ю

🙏976🐳4💔4🤔1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @stremreliz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

я поведу тебя в музей
@vmuzey · 35,813
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
ты сегодня такой пепперштейн
@ppstein · 22,861
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
ку-ку
@courierofculture · 44,946
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Современное искусство
@artornet · 28,480
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
The Art Newspaper Russia
@TANR_official · 22,179
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Музейный патруль
@muspatrol · 24,089
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
ART FLASH
@AFmagazine · 25,708
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 September 2026
ГЭС-2
@vacges2 · 31,963
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Shakko: об искусстве
@shakko_kitsune · 46,866
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Лепота
@leepotaa · 82,254
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Собака.ru
@sobaka_ru · 39,728
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
артохóлик
@artoholicmsc · 32,865
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Музей русского импрессионизма
@rusimp_museum · 22,480
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
[WORK IN ART] Работа в сфере искусства
@workinart · 71,088
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Бахчисарайские гвоздики
@darkmgimo · 106,682
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
musicAeterna
@musicaeternaTC · 25,437
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 17 September 2026
Центр «Зотов»
@centrezotov · 22,334
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 September 2026
Эрмитаж
@hermitage_museum · 39,023
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Мужчина, вы куда?
@crisisman · 44,838
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Пушкинский музей
@theartsmuseum · 38,078
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
Унежить душу
@neohota · 49,570
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Jobpower – креативные вакансии, работа в творческих сферах
@jobpower · 44,742
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 141,233
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Твой стремный коллаб” (@stremreliz), 9,623 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stremreliz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.