Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Твой стремный коллаб

Channel

Твой стремный коллаб

@stremreliz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,722subscribers

+212 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001226160488
TypeChannel
Username@stremreliz
DescriptionКанал о коллаборациях бизнеса и арт-искусства. Личное мнение автора. 11 лет около совриска (Эрмитаж>редактор>куратор), 3 года в фэшн, сейчас — медиаменеджер. Связь: @generaloval6 🚧 Не хожу на пресс-показы
Created4 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/stremreliz

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,4959,7229,608.56 August 2026 — 9,510 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,510 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,509 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,505 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,520 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,508 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,507 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,495 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,502 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,508 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,562 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,618 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,621 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,623 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,612 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,623 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,681 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,682 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,681 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,665 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,643 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,651 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,702 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,718 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,722 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,461–9,756 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 13:479,722+4
2 Nov 2026, 08:089,718+16
30 Oct 2026, 11:479,702+51
27 Oct 2026, 01:399,651+8
24 Oct 2026, 07:209,643-22
21 Oct 2026, 06:499,665-16
18 Oct 2026, 15:209,681-1
15 Oct 2026, 05:009,682+1
11 Oct 2026, 18:399,681+58
4 Oct 2026, 22:179,623+11
25 Sept 2026, 18:389,612-11
17 Sept 2026, 01:599,623+2
13 Sept 2026, 04:169,621+3
9 Sept 2026, 00:179,618+56
3 Sept 2026, 19:599,562+54
31 Aug 2026, 22:169,508+6
28 Aug 2026, 22:449,502+7
26 Aug 2026, 02:459,495-12
23 Aug 2026, 09:159,507-1
20 Aug 2026, 02:029,508first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 9,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held50 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total21,176
Reactions total854
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 21:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,500
Videos
≈421
Links
≈1,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,890 reactions across 50 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤71924.9%
💯46416.1%
🔥2709.34%
🌚2629.07%
😢2458.48%
⚡1756.06%
🙏1655.71%
💔1525.26%
😍1214.19%
👍873.01%
🤩662.28%
🥰612.11%
🐳411.42%
🤔180.623%
👏160.554%
❤‍🔥150.519%
🎉130.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,890 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.00%
1 of 50 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,690
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,820
over 49 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvE2bv2128 July 202628 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (30.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC506 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Классификация инфоповодов. Памятка для пиарщика. Не все люди, которые продвигают проекты/ивенты понимают, почему про одних пишут и много, а других отправляют в «коммерчекий отдел». Я блогер и получаю десятки прессок, а еще руковожу диджиталом в медиа, поэтому объясню на пальцах. 1. Мясо. Информация, которую ты хочешь запостить, даже, если лежишь на смертном одре. Ее получение субъективно ощущается как будто тебе по…

😍16⚡15🙏11💯8👍3🤔2

4 Nov 2026, 21:50 UTC≈1,360 views77 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @sobaka_ruPhoto

⚡️Петербургская художница на обложке Vogue Portugal На одной из четырех обложек ноябрьского арт-номера — студентка Академии Штиглица и участница объединения «Кружок» Александра Водопьянова. Автор фото — петербургский фотограф Дэниел Чернышов. О том, что их работа появится на обложке португальской версии Vogue, Александра и Дэниел узнали в момент релиза в соцсетях. Изначально съемка была частью личного арт-проекта Д…

❤48💔18⚡8🙏3

4 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC≈1,470 views75 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Все-таки российским брендам не хватает какой-то легкости и концептуальной аккуратности в работе с художниками, имхо. Я часто обращаю внимание на то, как минималистично действуют зарубежные (не все и не на массовых коллабах). Вот пример контента Burberry beauty с тремя авторами — вроде оч просто и даже банально, но! Тут и демонстрируется и особенность стиля художника (например, полячки Helena Minginowicz, которая рис…

😍30💔14💯12❤11🔥4❤‍🔥3👍1

3 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,580 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

У Бифрульки новый коллаб в стиле «цыганское барокко» — новогодний, с Глебом Барановым. 👀Глеб Баранов — это такой художник, которого в 2024 году я увидела на Port Art Fair, взяла его графику на выставку в KGallery, продавалась она за 60к. Год назад на ярмарке «Каталог» я увидела уже его живопись у Полины Аскери за конские 800 000 рублей (сейчас Глеб с галеристкой уже расстались). Хотя не особо-то и конские — сейчас м…

🔥14❤11😍6⚡4😢3

2 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,700 views125 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Коллаборация РГБ и Эксмо, известная теперь как «рейв в библиотеке» — уже главная коллаборация года в России, можно два месяца не ждать. Потому что это попадание в такое количество болевых точек общества и такая говорящая картинка, что, безусловно, войдет в историю. Причем удивительно, совсем мимо меня прошел анонс этого ивент, а ведь был он за месяц аж — но никто ничего не писал и не возмущался. Более того, в анонсе…

💯54❤44😍20⚡6🌚1

31 Oct 2026, 18:51 UTC≈2,010 views89 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

У москвичей уже рейвы в библиотеках проводят! Организовало издательство Эксмо. Публичке в Петербурге есть куда расти.

❤33👍18💯16🌚12🔥9🐳1

31 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,810 views34 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Может ли перформанс хорошим вариантом для коллаборации? Вы знаете, что перформансы вне специально отведенных для этого мест я практические не перевариваю и искренне не понимаю, зачем их ставят на презентациях, открытиях магазинов и ивентах. Почти всегда это балансирует на гране кринжа и лютого кринжа — даже у команды Анастасии Мироновой, которая чувствует стиль, не особо получилось с этим на открытии магазина в Моск…

❤‍🔥12🤩9💔8😍5

30 Oct 2026, 19:40 UTC≈1,820 views47 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Ну что, кто завтра к 8 утра пойдет в кофейню Покраса Лампаса? Я пока подожду, пока очереди рассосутся и запустят перформансы, кто читает мой канал в курсе, что у меня к ним слабость (лучше дочь проститутка, чем сын перформер, как говорится). А если серьезно, то новость об этом открытии побила рекорд по пересылкам инстача Собаки. ru, который я веду, словили дикий охват — в шоке, если честно.

❤24😢12🐳4🙏4🔥3

30 Oct 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,790 views63 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Через час начнется важнейший арт-благотворительный аукцион: «Ночлежка» продает плакаты уличного художника Миши Маркера — социальной рекламы, за которую не стыдно. Плакаты провисели на улице какое-то время, отработали свое и теперь, если их выгодно продадут, помогут «Ночлежке» в обустройстве собственно новой ночлежки. В 14:00 в канале благотворителей все и начнется. Миша Маркер — реально автор, который войдет в истор…

❤44😍10💔6🤔2⚡1

29 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,660 views64 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Вася Васин из «Кирпичей» выставляется в «Эрарте» — вслед за Шнуровым и Ромой Зверем он ступил на скользкую дорожку. «Кирпичи» некогда была культовой, но сейчас подзабытой, хотя вот прямо сегодня у них концерт. «Почему я стал художником-фишистом? Рыбы — мой повторяющийся сон», — приводится цитата автора в пресс-релизе. Художник-фишист...Вообще ранние «Кирпичи» 90-х — просто нереальный стиль был, как их лидер при этом…

🌚34😢9😍5❤3💯3🤔3🤩3⚡2

28 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,780 views46 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @chtogdeestvpeterburgePhoto

⚡️Эксклюзив! Кофейня каллиграфутуриста Покраса Лампаса (с предметами быта из русской деревни и арт-перформансами!) в пространстве Seno откроется уже в этот уикенд. «У меня еще не было пространства в Петербурге, где двери были бы открыты для людей. Это место на 30 м² — тотальная живая инсталляция имени меня», — делится Покрас. Дизайн-проект в духе черной-черной пещеры и каллиграфия — дело рук Лампаса. Внушительная ч…

😢20😍10🌚6❤4💔4⚡2

27 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,720 views45 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Эти антично-гурьяновские вайбы в кампейне Гоши Рубчинского с подростками, которыми на вид лет 13...свеженькие фото вот. Все-таки, иногда хочется, чтобы дух «Новой Академии» немного подвыветрился.

😢22💯17💔5🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @stremreliz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

я поведу тебя в музей
@vmuzey · 35,915
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
ты сегодня такой пепперштейн
@ppstein · 23,107
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
ку-ку
@courierofculture · 45,093
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Современное искусство
@artornet · 28,350
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
КУЛЬТУРНЫЕ ЛЮДИ
@culturepeople · 20,721
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
The Art Newspaper Russia
@TANR_official · 22,335
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Музейный патруль
@muspatrol · 24,911
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
ART FLASH
@AFmagazine · 25,518
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 September 2026
Tри сестры
@trisestrii · 21,434
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 September 2026
ГЭС-2
@vacges2 · 32,313
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Shakko: об искусстве
@shakko_kitsune · 47,010
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
ArtFragment
@ArtFragment · 18,760
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 5 October 2026
Искусство для пацанчиков
@nastya4che · 21,862
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Музей «Гараж»
@garagemca · 19,379
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
Лепота
@leepotaa · 83,029
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Где выставка
@gdeart · 22,051
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Собака.ru
@sobaka_ru · 39,870
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
РБК Стиль
@rbcstyle · 35,893
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
артохóлик
@artoholicmsc · 32,716
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
psycho daily
@psychodaily · 18,936
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
Музей русского импрессионизма
@rusimp_museum · 22,614
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Янковская
@myankovskaya · 19,254
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
[WORK IN ART] Работа в сфере искусства
@workinart · 72,109
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
HERMITAGE daily
@hermitage_hermitage · 19,099
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Твой стремный коллаб” (@stremreliz), 9,722 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stremreliz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.