Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мегастиль

Channel

Мегастиль

@megastil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,497subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319193629
TypeChannel
Username@megastil
Created20 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/megastil

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,49713,58213,539.56 August 2026 — 13,581 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,582 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,574 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,571 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,576 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,574 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,570 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,567 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,557 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,558 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,555 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,557 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,555 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,554 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,549 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,541 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,539 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,538 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,524 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,523 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,522 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,514 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,497 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 34 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,484–13,595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 10:2013,497-17
6 Sept 2026, 03:3913,514-8
3 Sept 2026, 23:0113,522-1
2 Sept 2026, 11:5513,523-1
1 Sept 2026, 12:0413,524-13
31 Aug 2026, 12:3613,537-1
30 Aug 2026, 12:1713,538+1
29 Aug 2026, 11:5513,537-2
28 Aug 2026, 10:2813,539-2
27 Aug 2026, 12:2513,541-8
26 Aug 2026, 11:4513,549-5
24 Aug 2026, 10:1713,554-1
21 Aug 2026, 09:1513,555-2
20 Aug 2026, 10:3413,557+2
18 Aug 2026, 11:1613,555-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:4713,558+1
16 Aug 2026, 08:4513,557-10
14 Aug 2026, 17:3713,567-3
13 Aug 2026, 05:1413,570-4
12 Aug 2026, 05:5713,574first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 13,497 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held11 (14 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total8,390
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

571 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
37465.5%
💯5810.2%
😁569.81%
🔥244.20%
❤‍🔥213.68%
😢213.68%
🌚81.40%
👍50.876%
💘30.525%
🤓10.175%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC705 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @theosdnewPhoto

Чтд. Идиотизм всегда побеждает. Потому что тупых людей больше чем умных. Джон сам попросил отменить выставку, что благородно и всем удобно. Но как же бесит, нет сил.

😢215💯5

31 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC945 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Я обычно активно ратую за институт репутации и культуру отмены, когда она оправдана, но ситуация с Гальяно - это какая-то полная идиотия. Не очень понимаю, о каком втором шансе и отмаливании грехов можно рассуждать в случае человека, который, на минуточку, 10 лет отпахал в отнюдь не камерном бренде, на чьи показы все радостно ходили и чьи вещи с удовольствием покупали, и чье финальное шоу и вовсе, скорее всего, попад

20💯17👍4❤‍🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,270 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Слева очки Celine, справа очки с Vinted за 15 евро Как говорится, вот и думайте 🤭

27💯13💘3❤‍🔥2🤓1

22 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC≈3,000 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

У нас на Сытинском стартовал большой летний сейл! Самые «жирные» винтажные лоты с внушительными скидками ждут вас сегодня и завтра ;) Шоурум Strogo Сытинский переулок 8/2

20🔥13

14 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈2,470 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Хорошие штанишки вышли у State Venice, рекомендую

26🔥11🌚8

24 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC≈3,250 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Гениальная идея двойного френча, вдохновлённая обувью Dries Van Noten, от лондонской нейл-артистки Сенсаи Кобо. Коллеги, берём на заметку 💅🏻

55

24 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,690 views58 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Вчера посмотрели «Одиссею» Нолана. Краткое резюме: я проревела примерно треть фильма 🤡 Лично мне кажется довольно странным оценивать его как экранизацию чего бы то ни было и давать ему критические оценки по этой шкале. Вполне очевидно, что гомеровская «Одиссея» служит лишь подложкой для более глобальной идеи, которая, увы, в современном мире не потеряла актуальности примерно ни на йоту. В последний раз схожие ощущен

48❤‍🔥10

16 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC≈2,520 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Чем дольше смотрю на эти желейно-латексные туфельки бренда Zellous, тем сильнее свербит мысль: мне надо… В их носибельности я, конечно, слабо уверена: «декольте» настолько глубокое, что кажется, будто нога должна вылетать из туфли при каждом шаге, но как же красиво смотрятся.

19💯11❤‍🔥6

16 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC≈2,280 views103 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @scoteenaPhoto

все понятно, Дарио Витале перешел в Befree

😁5647

14 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,950 views72 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю человека, который носит самые сложные fashion-архивы также легко и играючи, как основательница The Archiveast Камила Кучикова ❤️‍🔥

57💯12❤‍🔥2👍1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @megastil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вишлист
@myhotelki · 48,652
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
time vs. vogue
@time_vs_vogue · 33,358
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Гуд морнинг, Карл!
@goodmorningkarl · 56,145
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Отдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 46,183
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,798
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 107,690
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
Olga Karput 🥬
@okarput · 30,672
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Безфильтров
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,718
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Будни Гальяно
@budnigalliano · 27,872
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Bon Mot
@lebonmot · 36,936
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мегастиль” (@megastil), 13,497 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megastil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.