Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 37 days, net +1,793. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,048–26,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 06:38
26,110
+11
9 Sept 2026, 23:56
26,099
+74
6 Sept 2026, 14:17
26,025
+78
4 Sept 2026, 05:20
25,947
+34
2 Sept 2026, 17:34
25,913
+47
1 Sept 2026, 18:28
25,866
+78
31 Aug 2026, 18:48
25,788
+19
30 Aug 2026, 20:54
25,769
+56
29 Aug 2026, 18:45
25,713
+66
28 Aug 2026, 16:58
25,647
+29
27 Aug 2026, 16:33
25,618
+79
26 Aug 2026, 14:14
25,539
+11
25 Aug 2026, 17:27
25,528
+72
24 Aug 2026, 17:23
25,456
+91
22 Aug 2026, 22:24
25,365
+101
21 Aug 2026, 13:23
25,264
+51
20 Aug 2026, 14:23
25,213
+46
19 Aug 2026, 13:27
25,167
+63
18 Aug 2026, 14:12
25,104
+50
17 Aug 2026, 14:06
25,054
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.53%
avg views ÷ 26,110 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
34 (29 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
37,332
Reactions total
806
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,530 reactions across 34 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
606
39.6%
🔥
469
30.7%
❤🔥
152
9.93%
😍
115
7.52%
👍
104
6.80%
👀
45
2.94%
✍
16
1.05%
🏆
6
0.392%
🤝
6
0.392%
👏
5
0.327%
🤩
4
0.261%
😭
1
0.065%
🤨
1
0.065%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,530 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The shares total 284%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#TelegramTips
Telegram исполнилось 13 лет, и в честь этого вышло большое обновление 🎉
Разбираем что нового появилось в мессенджере:
📎Персональные приветствия в каналах и группах
Теперь администраторы могут выстроить цепочку до 3-х приветственных сообщений для новых участников. Главная фишка – приветствие отображается только новому пользователю и остаётся невидимым для остальных участников чата.
Как настроить: «Н…
#ZebraApps
Поздравляем с 1 сентября!🍂
Ко Дню знаний в Зебре появились праздничные AI-стилизации!
Можно превратить любое фото в кадр из школьного альбома, обложку журнала или сказочную иллюстрацию за пару секунд.
Коллекция школьных AI-шаблонов уже доступна в приложении на главном экране:
https://apps.apple.com/ru/app/id6447904215
Или на сайте зебры - zebra.tg
Заходите примерять!🎓
Кто хочет затестить наше новое приложение?🔥
Кепка – это умный AI-помощник для iOS, который берет на себя всю рутину с текстами, заметками и голосовыми. Всё самое нужное для быстрой работы с информацией собрано в одном месте:
🧢 Превращение голоса в заметки – расскажите про свой день или скажите список покупок, приложение само сформирует понятную структурированную заметку.
🧢 Клавиатура со сниппетами – сохраняйте час…
#EvaApp
Самое масштабное обновление Eva за всё время🌟
Eva вышла на новый уровень! Вышло обновление, которое стирает границы между устройствами и делает ежедневную рутину максимально комфортной:
💻 Eva в браузере
Теперь у приложения есть полноценная веб-версия:
📎https://web.evacalendar.app
Просто авторизуйтесь на сайте, и ваши данные: задачи, привычки, заметки, дневник, вес и отметки «Последний раз», мгновенно по…
#OtherTips
Где брать «те самые» мемные звуки и эффекты для видео 🎙
Короткий звуковой акцент может вытянуть даже самый простой ролик: добавить юмора, создать напряжение или подчеркнуть реакцию в кадре. Но искать отдельные эффекты по видеохостингам и вырезать их вручную - это долго и неудобно.
📎Сайт myinstants.com – удобный ресурс, где собраны звуки на любой случай. Там сотни эффектов: от классических «ба-дум-тсс» д…
#ZebraApp
Как удержать внимание на видеоколлаже: очерёдность кадров в Зебре🎬
Знакомая ситуация: вы делаете красивый коллаж из нескольких видео, запускаете его, а ролики начинают воспроизводиться одновременно. В итоге глаза разбегаются, и зритель не успевает рассмотреть ни одну из деталей.
Мы решили эту проблему и добавили поочерёдное воспроизведение видео в ячейках! Теперь кадры могут включаться последовательно од…
#iPhoneTips
Каких привычных фишек не будет в новом iPhone Ultra📱
Первый складной iPhone анонсируют уже через пару недель, и ажиотаж вокруг него огромный. По слухам, он будет стоить около $2000. Казалось бы, за такие деньги в смартфоне должно быть всё самое лучшее. Но нет: ради уникального дизайна Apple пошла на несколько серьёзных компромиссов, о которых стоит знать заранее.
Вот 5 базовых функций, которые «пойдут …
#CapCutTips
✨ Трендовые анимации текста в CapCut
Хотите, чтобы ваши видео выглядели живо и стильно? Попробуйте добавить анимацию текста.
📎 Вырезка // Pop Up
📎 Влюбленные // In Love
📎 Взрывная карамель // Popping Candy
📎 Клик // Click
📎 Повернуть // Rotate
📎 Проматывание // Scrolling
📎 Сложение // Fold
📎 Появление // Fly in
📎 Колесо шрифтов // Font reel
📎 Отдаление // Zoom out
Как добавить:
Заходим в CapCut ➡️ те…
#iPhoneTips
Как в iPhone сделать избранные контакты☎️
Если вы каждый раз открываете приложение «Телефон», ищете нужного человека и только потом звоните, то есть способ сократить это до одного касания.
В iPhone можно добавить нужных людей в «Избранное», там они появятся крупными плитками прямо на главном экране приложения «Телефон». Одно касание, и сразу звонок, сообщение, FaceTime или письмо, в зависимости от того…
#ZebraApp
Свежее обновление в Зебре: сохраняйте персональный стиль, видео поверх видео и умные шаблоны✨
Выкатили большой апдейт, который сделает работу над контентом ещё быстрее и удобнее! Собрали самые главные фичи:
📎«Мой стиль» – ваш фирменный брендинг в один тап
Теперь можно один раз сохранить свои цвета, шрифты, стили текста и водяные знаки. Они будут под рукой в любом проекте, а сохранённые элементы встанут …
#OtherTips
Что видел телескоп Hubble в ваш день рождения?🔭
NASA сделали интерактив, который отвечает на этот вопрос. Вводите месяц и день своего рождения, и получаете снимок из архивов телескопа Hubble, сделанный именно в эту календарную дату за более чем 30 лет наблюдений.
Это не фото в момент вашего рождения конкретного года, а кадр, который Hubble снял в один из дней с этой датой за всё время работы. На снимке …
🔥20❤8😍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @gozebra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 284%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
memforsmm: шаблоны мемов для smm менеждеров @memforsmm · 3,705#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Музыка для видео @music_for_video · 44,538 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зебра Подслушала” (@gozebra), 26,110 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gozebra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.