Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Скажи, кто я

Channel

Скажи, кто я

@yasamineTM

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

55,682subscribers

+551 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001213714596
TypeChannel
Username@yasamineTM
Descriptionличный блог врача, которая вещает о норме и патологии женского организма простыми словами🫶🏻 Роскомнадзор внес меня в лучшие научпоп каналы: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67aaa2b2962afd032d82bf6a
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/yasamineTM

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

55,02157,89256,456.57 August 2026 — 55,131 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,131 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,112 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,071 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,021 subscribers11 August 2026 — 55,253 subscribers12 August 2026 — 55,447 subscribers13 August 2026 — 55,402 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55,429 subscribers15 August 2026 — 55,400 subscribers17 August 2026 — 57,892 subscribers18 August 2026 — 57,858 subscribers19 August 2026 — 57,837 subscribers20 August 2026 — 57,775 subscribers21 August 2026 — 57,773 subscribers23 August 2026 — 57,751 subscribers24 August 2026 — 57,686 subscribers25 August 2026 — 57,640 subscribers26 August 2026 — 57,634 subscribers27 August 2026 — 57,633 subscribers28 August 2026 — 57,618 subscribers29 August 2026 — 57,614 subscribers30 August 2026 — 57,584 subscribers31 August 2026 — 57,531 subscribers1 September 2026 — 57,486 subscribers2 September 2026 — 57,433 subscribers4 September 2026 — 57,378 subscribers6 September 2026 — 57,291 subscribers9 September 2026 — 57,202 subscribers12 September 2026 — 57,107 subscribers13 September 2026 — 57,059 subscribers15 September 2026 — 56,983 subscribers17 September 2026 — 56,946 subscribers27 September 2026 — 56,981 subscribers4 October 2026 — 56,756 subscribers9 October 2026 — 56,507 subscribers13 October 2026 — 56,326 subscribers14 October 2026 — 56,258 subscribers16 October 2026 — 56,198 subscribers16 October 2026 — 56,190 subscribers18 October 2026 — 56,133 subscribers18 October 2026 — 56,110 subscribers20 October 2026 — 56,074 subscribers20 October 2026 — 56,055 subscribers22 October 2026 — 56,050 subscribers23 October 2026 — 55,994 subscribers24 October 2026 — 55,963 subscribers25 October 2026 — 55,893 subscribers26 October 2026 — 55,860 subscribers27 October 2026 — 55,829 subscribers28 October 2026 — 55,817 subscribers29 October 2026 — 55,808 subscribers30 October 2026 — 55,781 subscribers31 October 2026 — 55,750 subscribers1 November 2026 — 55,735 subscribers1 November 2026 — 55,751 subscribers3 November 2026 — 55,708 subscribers4 November 2026 — 55,682 subscribers55,6827 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net +551. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,590–58,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 03:1455,682-26
3 Nov 2026, 03:3655,708-43
1 Nov 2026, 23:5555,751+16
1 Nov 2026, 03:2855,735-15
31 Oct 2026, 04:1955,750-31
30 Oct 2026, 06:5655,781-27
29 Oct 2026, 06:2055,808-9
28 Oct 2026, 04:3755,817-12
27 Oct 2026, 07:2755,829-31
26 Oct 2026, 09:1055,860-33
25 Oct 2026, 06:2655,893-70
24 Oct 2026, 03:0255,963-31
23 Oct 2026, 03:4655,994-56
22 Oct 2026, 03:1856,050-5
20 Oct 2026, 23:5956,055-19
20 Oct 2026, 00:2856,074-36
18 Oct 2026, 23:2856,110-23
18 Oct 2026, 00:5856,133-57
16 Oct 2026, 22:3956,190-8
16 Oct 2026, 00:2856,198first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 55,682 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held75 (28 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total310,740
Reactions total7,274
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
925
Videos
82
Links
119

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 23s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

27,774 reactions across 75 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524039543443373507224,26687.4%
custom 52400305125374321171,8786.76%
custom 52399906552409240001,6305.87%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,774 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 75 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yasamineTM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.33%
1 of 75 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
16,300
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
17,000
over 74 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeHLox7130 September 202630 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (27.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC≈8,040 views958 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026

Боты и хейт. Коллеги, откровение. Я впервые написала досудебную на реального человека, который ходил по разным видео и писал про меня гадости. Мне все равно на пустые аккаунты, которые принадлежат индусам, на фейков и ботов, но когда реальный человек с фотографией и признаками, по которым его можно идентифицировать дает характеристику мне как врачу-гинекологу (он мужчина), вводя в заблуждение людей — досудебка. Я м…

custom 5240395434433735072763custom 5239990655240924000195

Signed Яс

31 Oct 2026, 18:37 UTC≈10,500 views432 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026

Пекарня Со вторника ежедневно нахожусь в пекарне и участвую во всех процессах. Общение с командой, гостями, выкладка продукта, вся работа с витриной внутри и снаружи. Сейчас уставшая после смены пишу пост — хочу поделиться с вами новым этапом в моей жизни. Все-таки у меня родился огромный, почти самостоятельный ребенок. Я вдохновлялась пекарнями Копенгагена, Парижа, поэтому в Май скандинавия смешана со слоеными из…

custom 5239990655240924000293custom 5240395434433735072139

Signed Яс

29 Oct 2026, 20:39 UTC≈10,800 views269 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @aaamagazinePhoto

Запускаем новую рубрику «Люди дела». В ней мы будем разговаривать с профессионалами из самых разных сфер: медицины, спорта, науки, бизнеса и не только. Узнаем, как устроена их работа изнутри, с чем к ним приходят чаще всего и что они хотели бы, чтобы знал каждый из нас. Первая героиня рубрики Буали Ясмин, врач-гинеколог. Она принимает в Краснодаре и Москве и рассказывает о норме и патологии женского организма прост…

custom 5240395434433735072224custom 523999065524092400045

Signed Яс

26 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC≈14,100 views159 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Я бы хотела рассказать, где я, но ничего не слышно 🙂

custom 5240395434433735072153custom 52399906552409240006

Signed Яс

26 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC≈13,900 views189 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5240395434433735072144custom 523999065524092400045

Signed Яс

24 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC≈15,700 views519 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Силы Исходя из базовых настроек я достаточно ранимый, замкнутый и нежный человек. Смотря на то, что мир не терпит этих навыков в конкуренции — о моей бисквитной душе знают немногие. Вот теперь и вы. Сейчас я приспособилась практически к любой ситуации, но если бы вы меня встретили раньше и нагрубили/раскритиковали работу — я б дико расстроилась и ушла в самокопание. Нежные люди учатся твердеть. Шаг за шагом, год за…

custom 5240395434433735072451custom 523999065524092400068

Signed Яс

23 Oct 2026, 14:13 UTC≈13,500 views152 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5240395434433735072132custom 523999065524092400020

Signed Яс

23 Oct 2026, 14:13 UTC≈12,700 views61 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Мы на Акрополе!

custom 524039543443373507245custom 523999065524092400016

Signed Яс

22 Oct 2026, 05:50 UTC≈13,300 views176 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5240395434433735072169custom 52399906552409240007

Signed Яс

19 Oct 2026, 15:34 UTC≈16,800 views118 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Львиная доля моего блога занята ВПЧ. Ему посвящены, если не совру, десятки рилс в инстуле. Я каждый день смотрю кольпоскопии у пациенток с дисплазиями в анамнезе, с лисплазиями сейчас и возможной дисплазией из-за впч. Каждый раз это долгий разговор про диагноз, необходимость вакцинации и что делать дальше. Ключевой момент «что делать дальше». Потому что самое тревожное — не знать и не получить эту информацию от врача…

custom 5240395434433735072108custom 523999065524092400010

Signed Яс

16 Oct 2026, 22:40 UTC≈14,900 views188 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

окак и нет, я не на хайкинге в горах

custom 5239990655240924000186custom 52403954344337350722

Signed Яс

16 Oct 2026, 22:19 UTC≈14,800 views243 reactionsread 2 November 2026

Барселона Ваш блогер на новой земле, прибыл исследовать невиданные ранее окрестности (посещать пекарни). Заглянула перед конгрессом по впч в Испанию. Выбирала между Мадридом и Барсой: все знатоки сказали, что первый город однозначно должен быть Барселона. Слушаюс. Товарищ любезно скинул свои гугл записи, буду ходить по ним!

custom 5239990655240924000167custom 524039543443373507276

Signed Яс

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @yasamineTM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@yasamineTM edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 September 2026
Most recent edit
5 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @yasamineTM as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTCAnonymous Poll5,520 voters approx.

бюджет 1 млн

  1. Известный бренд + скромный натуральный камень20%
  2. Ювелир + натуральный камень побольше70%
  3. Ювелир + внушительный лабораторный камень10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 121,649
#1
врач маминой подруги
@raynbuldez · 22,964
#2
dr nicole 🪷
@doctogram · 4,917
#3
Dr. Utochkina
@dr_utochkina · 7,657
#4
With Sevda
@sevdaaskerr · 2,550
#5
Гинеколог и Я | проект о женском здоровье
@womenhealth1pro · 9,358
#6
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 102,185
#7
Garaeva 🩺
@mmallekaaa · 7,243
#8
V I V A L A V I K A
@Viva_la_vika · 43,213
#9
не ohalin , а алина вильямсон
@realOHalin · 3,762
#10
Даша Естьфамилия
@estfamiliyatg · 3,683
#11
KAKDELA
@mariakakdela · 94,941
#12
Доктор Нагорская
@drnagorskaya · 8,525
#13
Doctor Oleinikova
@Doctor_Oleinikova1 · 7,478
#14
Alexandra Posnova
@posnovaalexandra · 200,893
#15
врач рисующий
@spnullityy · 5,727
#16
Клуб гипножопок
@commeirenesdiaries · 13,819
#17
Мари в большом городе
@naiznankumari · 20,299
#18
MMARGO
@mmargosavchuk · 116,849
#19
Елизавета Мил | врач, нутрициолог
@lizawetaa_mil · 3,819
#20
ломбард взглядов🫂
@lombardmmi · 1,116
#21
asyaulmanenechannel
@asyaulmanenechannel · 2
#22
ARINA BATYROVA
@Arinabatyrovaa · 1,054
#23
Skinkaterin
@e_cat_aa · 854
#24
doc.moiiseiva🤍🩺
@moiiseiva · 2,130
#25
Доктор Вишнева | Худеем без запретов
@vishnevadel · 15,262
#26
TANYAMINT
@tanyamintofficial · 17,309
#27
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,589
#28
rutkismary
@rutkismary · 331,093
#29
ymirauotlubví
@ymirauotlubvii · 10,267 (as read 12 September 2026)
#30
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,118,319
#31
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 631,942
#32
welcome к Асе
@antasyass · 2,652
#33
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,173,719
#34
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 349,728
#35
Sasha Burimova
@burimovasasha · 80,532
#36
Dr. Marta 👩🏻‍⚕️
@mmaartaaaaa · 9,904
#37
Даша Козловская
@dashakozlouskayatg · 132,889
#38
каналь + (жрац home cook)
@sonya_home_cook · 2,141
#39
Pivazyan_Laura 👩🏻‍⚕️ @pivazyan_
@pivazyan_laura · 2,922
#40
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,063
#41
MUR
@fashion_mur · 205,502
#42
Tata.
@tatasifasi · 7,895
#43
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,662
#44
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 486,057
#45
ОЙСАШ🚀
@etosashaaaa · 53,182
#46
Записки ординатора
@doctor_grigoryasha · 1,028
#47
Katya Golden
@katya_golden · 106,346
#48
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,148
#49
Лина Вадимовна
@drbrusilovskaya · 950
#50
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,178
#51
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,281
#52
Marina Golomazdina
@marinagolomazdina · 119,118
#53
говорит и показывает Шуанет 🐚
@shunya_akhm · 67,577
#54
селф-лав club 🫶🏼
@tutselflove · 12,981
#55
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 54,791
#56
your.doc.vika
@study_adjika · 3,938
#57
privet.beauty
@privetbeauty · 5,403
#58
Доктор Молчанова. Лечу и учу
@gynecology_docmed · 724
#59
А!
@aaamagazine · 78,930
#60
Veronika14
@veronika14 · 62,225
#61
Ն
@ashxarss · 788
#62
Мари Новосад
@novosadmari · 18,279
#63
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,060,017
#64
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,547
#65
mironovanastasiia
@mironovanastasiia · 145,913
#66
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 567,344
#67

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Сапият
@sunxsteel · 25,973
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Kronindoc
@kronin_doc · 21,980
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 September 2026
врач маминой подруги
@raynbuldez · 22,964
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
Ordinatura.org | Ординатура орг
@ordinatura_org · 24,194
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Скажи, кто я” (@yasamineTM), 55,682 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yasamineTM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.