Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,493–22,662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:35
22,636
+17
15 Sept 2026, 19:21
22,619
-8
14 Sept 2026, 01:20
22,627
-13
12 Sept 2026, 10:40
22,640
+13
10 Sept 2026, 10:58
22,627
-10
7 Sept 2026, 05:20
22,637
-5
4 Sept 2026, 10:20
22,642
+21
2 Sept 2026, 19:43
22,621
+27
1 Sept 2026, 18:04
22,594
+7
31 Aug 2026, 17:12
22,587
-16
30 Aug 2026, 18:26
22,603
+6
29 Aug 2026, 17:44
22,597
-5
28 Aug 2026, 17:17
22,602
-18
27 Aug 2026, 14:25
22,620
-4
26 Aug 2026, 16:02
22,624
+2
25 Aug 2026, 16:36
22,622
+1
24 Aug 2026, 14:06
22,621
+20
23 Aug 2026, 00:57
22,601
+43
21 Aug 2026, 13:08
22,558
+11
20 Aug 2026, 12:47
22,547
first reading
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 22,636 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 97 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
97 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
88,600
Reactions total
2,839
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 29s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,156 reactions across 79 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,359
58.5%
🤣
1,257
13.7%
🔥
911
9.95%
💔
280
3.06%
😭
240
2.62%
custom 5474311937628084121
215
2.35%
⚡
215
2.35%
😍
200
2.18%
😢
158
1.73%
💯
116
1.27%
👀
108
1.18%
🤝
49
0.535%
custom 5203927133411365006
15
0.164%
🗿
14
0.153%
custom 5474563962014049067
9
0.098%
custom 5188308136947130525
6
0.066%
🙊
3
0.033%
custom 5296442111946666016
1
0.011%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,557 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 97 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raynbuldez. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 97 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.06%
2 of 97 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,470
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,740
over 95 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnje77u6j
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2VtzqwLAZcX
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Нужна ли вакцинация от ВПЧ во взрослом возрасте? От чего защищает прививка? Какой препарат лучше поставить? Если вы уже задавались этими вопросами, наш новый материал — для вас.
В новой статье вместе с врачом акушером-гинекологом Валерией Метальниковой мы разобрали самые важные аспекты вакцинации от ВПЧ:
— Что такое вирус папилломы человека,
— От чего защищает прививка,
— Нужно ли делать прививку от ВПЧ после начал…
Ура! Стартовали! 🚀🎓 Друзья, в добрый путь (как говорили в одном из моих любимейших мультиков про летучий корабль)
https://womenhealth.pro/course
Если возникли сложности, скорее напишите нам в службу заботы
2017 год. Моя первая неделя обучения в мед.университете. Изучение костей на кафедре анатомии, в коридорах которой до боли в глазах пахло формалином. Мытье полов и катание марлевых шариков на санитарной практике в поликлинике. Я тогда была такая счастливая! Как сейчас помню: в первый день учебы шел ливень, я надела туфли с каблуком 10 см и опоздала на лекцию на 1,5 часа, потому что жила далеко за МКАДом у родственнико…
Самый крутой диалог с сегодняшнего приема:
— Здравствуйте! Меня к вам направила моя коллега, *называет фамилию* может помните?
— Дашу конечно помню! Как она?
— Ходит вся светится, похудела, мы ей восхищаемся, спасибо вам за нее! Передавала вам привет
— 🥹🥹🥹
Тот самый «сложный случай», прием которого закончился в 21:30 вместо 21:00. Одной из моих железных рекомендаций было: «снизить вес, чтобы операции больше не повт…
Лубрикант в прикроватной тумбочке — это основа нормальной сексуальной жизни (мое скромное мнение, как врача-гинеколога). Вагинальная сухость может возникнуть совершенно неожиданно и по разным причинам: хронический стресс, лактация, прием препаратов, перименопауза. Использование гелей для дополнительного увлажнения — это must have, а не что-то «стыдное» и не укладывающееся в «норму».
Какие свойства выбирать?
• Водная…
Материнство может не мешать карьере, а усиливать вовлечённость в работу
Десятилетиями в науке о труде существует концепт «motherhood penalty» — представление о том, что работающих матерей воспринимают как менее преданных работе. Авторы нового исследования Университета Нью-Мексико в Journal of Applied Psychology изучили этот вопрос — и нашли данные, указывающие в обратную сторону.
Учёные опросили более 600 сотрудник…
16 сентября в 19:00 ждём мам и девочек на встречу с гинекологами ✨
В комфортной обстановке наши специалисты:
❤️ ответят девочкам на все вопросы о теле, изменениях и гигиене
❤️ подскажут мамам, как говорить с дочкой без страха и неловкости
Вы сможете избежать сложных разговоров и стать ближе. Приходите!
🅰️🥹😄🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️😀🅰️🅰️🅰️ по ссылке
Фотозаметки с нашей третьей конференции по медицинской коммуникации по карьерным возможностям врача. Что было?
🔘"Как получить оффер в топовую клинику на этапе ординатуры?" (Я)
🔘"Сильные стороны и карта безграничных возможностей для врачей - как получать максимум удовольствия и удовлетворения от работы в медицине и за ее пределами" (Кирилл Кузьмичев)
🔘"Как взять от профессии максимум: международные возможности для …
«Пукающее» влагалище на спорте и во время секса: норм или стрём?
Влагалище — это не закрытая камера, а эластичный трубчатый орган, который способен растягиваться и сокращаться. При определённых движениях создаётся эффект «помпы»: воздух засасывается внутрь, а затем выходит со звуком.
«Вагинальные пуки» или queefing возможны при активных упражнениях, смене поз или во время секса. Это не связано ни с пищеварением, ни…
Суд во Франции впервые признал рак груди бортпроводницы профессиональным заболеванием
Софи Лено отлетала в Air France тридцать лет — с 1989 по 2019 год, начинала стюардессой, а закончила старшей бортпроводницей. За это время у неё накопилось больше 12 600 часов налёта, из которых почти 6 500 пришлись на ночные рейсы. А в 2019-м, вскоре после ухода из авиакомпании, ей поставили диагноз — рак молочной железы.
Сначала…
❤141🔥21⚡9👀4
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @raynbuldez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Гинеколог и Я | проект о женском здоровье @womenhealth1pro · 9,364#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ordinatura.org | Ординатура орг @ordinatura_org · 24,329 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Скажи, кто я @yasamineTM · 56,946 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 September 2026
Пироговский университет @daily_2med · 23,220 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
Reclin - live @reclinlive · 30,488 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Доктор Гребешкова @doctor_grebeshkova · 34,452 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Медицинский блог Сеченова @medblognomer1 · 24,544 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Помощник педиатра | МедикУм @pomoshnik_pediatra · 23,914 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
ikhazin @ikhazin · 33,168 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 September 2026
Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин @tgnikitin · 44,506 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
МОССУДМЕД 🇷🇺 @reshetunalexey · 39,830 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Цитаты преподавателей @quotes_teacher · 47,684 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
SYNAPSE I СИНАПС @synapse_channel_1 · 40,119 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Мурашко по коже 🩺🏥 @murashko_med · 136,726 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Записки юного Вовчика @medlci13 · 44,556 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Медицинская Россия @mediamedics · 143,118 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Медицинская Литература @clinirec · 34,336 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
alexeevvaamm🤍 @alexeevvvaamm · 72,285 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“врач маминой подруги” (@raynbuldez), 22,636 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raynbuldez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
