13 measurements spanning 35 days, net +3,322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,335–9,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 16:01
8,224
-3
4 Sept 2026, 09:38
8,227
-20
31 Aug 2026, 16:08
8,247
-1
28 Aug 2026, 10:33
8,248
-9
25 Aug 2026, 03:34
8,257
-31
21 Aug 2026, 11:24
8,288
-389
18 Aug 2026, 16:05
8,677
+3,427
15 Aug 2026, 09:56
5,250
+54
12 Aug 2026, 06:06
5,196
+295
9 Aug 2026, 16:21
4,901
-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:40
4,904
+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:49
4,902
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:00
4,902
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 8,224 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
39 (27 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
40,122
Reactions total
719
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,649 reactions across 38 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
488
29.6%
❤🔥
225
13.6%
🔥
129
7.82%
custom 5463404382848592315
86
5.22%
custom 5341708610525224588
71
4.31%
🤣
66
4.00%
custom 5463355420221419933
54
3.27%
😁
52
3.15%
custom 5307576836136395991
50
3.03%
🙏
48
2.91%
custom 5339378620831916033
45
2.73%
custom 5463214214581630406
39
2.37%
custom 5463388263836327693
35
2.12%
💔
32
1.94%
🤯
30
1.82%
🤬
28
1.70%
😢
26
1.58%
🎉
19
1.15%
👀
17
1.03%
🥰
16
0.97%
9 further kinds
93
5.64%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,649 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aidscenter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
GLAAD: разрыв между наукой и восприятием ВИЧ в США
Новый отчет GLAAD (опрос 2500 американцев) показывает: терапия сделала ВИЧ-инфекцию управляемым хроническим заболеванием, но большинство населения об этом не знает.
Ключевые цифры:
— лишь 31% молодежи считают себя осведомленными о ВИЧ;
— 44% взрослых не знают или не согласны с принципом Н=Н (неопределяемый = непередаваемый);
— 72% за год не видели в СМИ историй реа…
Как бесплатно и анонимно узнать свой ВИЧ-статус?
Каждый может узнать свой ВИЧ-статус бесплатно и анонимно — без паспорта, записи в историю болезни и осуждения. Это можно сделать в государственных центрах СПИДа, инфекционных больницах и специализированных некоммерческих организациях. Главное — не бояться и тестироваться регулярно, не реже раза в год. Раннее обнаружение и своевременное начало лечения превращают ВИЧ-ин…
Коллектив Фонда «СПИД.ЦЕНТР» сердечно поздравляет Ивана Саввина с днем рождения! ❤️
Врач, ВИЧ-активист, координатор медицинского сервиса — в каждой роли ты остаешься человеком, которому доверяют сотни людей. Спасибо за твой труд, внимание и умение быть рядом в самые важные моменты.
Желаем крепкого здоровья, профессиональных успехов, душевного равновесия и личного счастья. Пусть каждый новый день приносит удовлетвор…
Дорогие друзья!
Открываем регистрацию на августовское Death Café 🖤
Ждем вас на открытие нового сезона
28 августа в 19:30
в пространстве Фонда «СПИД.ЦЕНТР».
Подробности — по ссылке для регистрации.
Первый российский ПЦР-тест на гепатит Е
Роспотребнадзор запустил производство отечественного ПЦР-теста для качественного определения РНК вируса гепатита Е. Тест-система обнаруживает возбудитель за 7–10 дней до появления симптомов, когда стандартные серологические тесты (на антитела) могут давать ложноотрицательный результат. Также применима для скрининга донорской крови, продуктов и водных проб.
Ежегодно в мире — о…
Спешим сообщить, что городской номер временно не работает.
Связаться с нами можно через инфолинию Фонда:
📞 +7 (925) 732-81-37
Или в Telegram:
💌 @AIDS_help
Фиджи: эпидемия ВИЧ вышла из-под контроля
Распространенность ВИЧ на Фиджи достигла 1,6% — каждый 60-й взрослый живёт с вирусом. В 2025 году диагностировано более 2000 новых случаев — рост на 27% за год. Каждую неделю рождается ребенок с ВИЧ, каждый месяц один ребенок умирает от СПИДа.
Вспышку объявили только в начале 2025 года, хотя с 2010 года число новых случаев выросло в 30 раз. Изначально эпидемия была среди лю…
🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄
«СПИД.ЦЕНТР» — одна из ведущих экспертных организаций в сфере ВИЧ. Мы можем приглашать в лекторий Фонда специалистов из разных областей и хотим учитывать ваши интересы при составлении программы.
В лектории «СПИД.ЦЕНТРа» обсуждаются не только проблемы ВИЧ. Мы говорим о медицине и здоровье, психологии, общественных вопросах, культуре и искусстве.
The shares total 248%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Жировая болезнь печени у людей с ВИЧ: нормальный ИМТ — не гарантия
В исследовании, представленном на AIDS 2026, ученые доказывают, что у 14,6% пациентов с ВИЧ и стеатозом печени индекс массы тела был ниже 25, то есть лишнего веса не было. При этом фиброз у них был не меньше, чем у пациентов с ожирением. Опираясь только на ИМТ, врачи рискуют пропустить тех, кому нужна помощь.
Среди худых пациентов со стеатозом чаще …
📚 Книжный клуб в «СПИД.ЦЕНТРе»
21 августа в 19:00 обсуждаем «Читая Лолиту в Тегеране» Азар Нафиси.
Это роман-мемуары Азар Нафиси, которая после учебы в Америке возвращается на родину в Иран, чтобы преподавать западную литературу в университете. Но Исламская революция меняет жизнь страны и каждого отдельно человека в ней.
В условиях запрета на изучение иностранной литературы женщина устраивает подпольные встречи для…
30 августа в клубе «Невротик», Камушки и СПИД.ЦЕНТР проведут последний ивент лета.
Лайнап откроет звуковой исследователь Питон Каа с сетом на виниле. За ним fennnch с селекцией из быстрых ритмов. Продюсерский дуэт Мala Interface сыграет ломанный сет сразу за ней.
Далее — Kedr Livanskiy с подборкой на стыке поп-хитов и грохочущей электронной музыки. Ближе к полуночи бэк ту бэк Дмитрия Гудничева и Миши Мещерина, а зак…
❤🔥15❤9⚡5custom 54634043828485923153😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @aidscenter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@aidscenter edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 248%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“спид.центр” (@aidscenter), 8,224 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aidscenter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.