А если бы вам пришлось бы стать антибиотиком, то вы бы каким захотели быть? 👇

Channel
Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,638subscribers
-98 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001394478317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tgnikitin |
| Description | Врач-клинфармаколог, к.м.н. https://evgeny-nikitin.ru/ — сайт, курсы [email protected] или @evgenynikitin2—сотрудничество Включена РКН в перечень персональных страниц https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673a5010290fef0e0115076d®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 11 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tgnikitin |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 44,638 | -24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 44,662 | -36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 44,698 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 44,709 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 44,727 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 44,745 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 44,769 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 44,778 | -23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 44,801 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 44,796 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 44,780 | +36 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 44,744 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 44,752 | +109 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 44,643 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 44,644 | +76 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 44,568 | -23 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 44,591 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 44,601 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 44,614 | -37 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 44,651 | first reading |
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.14%
- avg views ÷ 44,638 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,740
- 36 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.25%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 36
- of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (18 July 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 98,720 |
| Reactions total | 1,226 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 695
- Videos
- 198
- Links
- 425
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,874 reactions across 49 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,108 | 59.1% | |
| 👍 | 280 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 180 | 9.61% | |
| ❤🔥 | 158 | 8.43% | |
| 🥰 | 37 | 1.97% | |
| 👀 | 20 | 1.07% | |
| 🤣 | 19 | 1.01% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 0.907% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 0.747% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 0.694% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 0.267% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.267% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 0.213% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.213% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.16% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.16% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.107% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.053% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.053% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,913 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 6
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 52 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tgnikitin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Ну вообще я бы был тейкопланином))) — показаний завались — побочные эффекты «на спокойном» — дозирование «не бей лежачего» Да, нишево Но и я не нормис, попрошу
❤2
⚡️А ведь в игре «каким бы ты хотел быть антибиотиком» я бы выбрал именно его...
👍10❤3🔥1
Posted without readable text
🔥25❤15😢4👍1🥴1
Антибиотик РЕАЛЬНО вызывает менингит Сегодня снова рубрика «невыдуманные истории, о которых невозможно молчать» Или, как вариант: «побочки, которые попробуй ещё придумай» Кстати, вам вообще заходят такие истории? Писать ещё — или хватит пугать приличных людей? Ставьте ваши ❤️ и пишите в комментариях А теперь к пациентке: — 25 лет — респираторная инфекция — назначают амоксициллин Пять дней принимает препарат — и …
❤43👀20🔥11🤯8😱6👍4❤🔥1😍1
Итоги недели: ВИЧ, сперматозоиды и Zivert На этой неделе снова снимали новые эпизоды шоу «Доктора» Отсняли 5 моторов, и я понял, что мы стали опасно хороши Команда выросла на лям пунктов в профессионализме И теперь всё летит так, как никогда! Гордитесь, что знаете нас еще на моменте вылета ;) За один съёмочный день: ➡️ с инфекционистом раскидали тему ВИЧ-инфекции и сделали тест на ВИЧ. Какой результат у меня — н…
❤33🔥11👍4
Posted without readable text
❤9🔥4👍2
Posted without readable text
❤15🔥5👍2
Коллеги, это уже Никитин 👋 Не переживайте, если запутались, всё распутаем за ~7 минут подкаста Подключайтесь к листу ожидания курса «Антибиотики: применение у взрослых» Всё спокойно, доступно и без прессинга разобрал ИДУ РАСПУТЫВАТЬСЯ
❤10👍5🥰5
Антибиотик при бронхите — это ошибка?
- Да44%
- Нет56%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣14❤6🔥2
Цефтриаксон поколоть можно и вне стационара?
- Нельзя60%
- Можно40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @tgnikitin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@tgnikitin edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 17 August 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Цефтриаксон поколоть можно и вне стационара?
- Нельзя60%
- Можно40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
При сепсисе требуется широкоспектровая комбинация препаратов?
- Да64%
- Нет36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Корректируем дозу антибиотика согласно СКФ?
- Да90%
- Нет10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Понятие «курсового лечения» — это архаизм, и сейчас мы опираемся только на критерии достаточности?
- Да67%
- Нет33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Антибиотик при бронхите — это ошибка?
- Да44%
- Нет56%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@doctor_varnavskiy · 23,7023 postsКаплина О.Ю., гинеколог, гемостазиолог & dr.gemogyn
@dr_gemogyn · 21,4413 postsТы нормальная мама | врач-педиатр Анна Проскурякова
@pediatr_annstapro · 10,2533 postsИстории Доктора Долгушина
@drgrdolgushin · 13,6952 postsбудни кровавого ветеринара
@bloody_Liza · 8661 postДоктор Каплина (Демехова)
@dr_demekhova · 1,1501 postНикита Васильченко | Здоровье суставов
@dr_vasilchenko · 3,5301 postДиетолог | Атаманова Юлия | Эндокринолог
@drAtamanova · 3,7671 postПедиатр Имаева Людмила Уфа
@imaeva_pediatr · 3751 postНевролог |Сомнолог|Эпилептолог| Татьяна Малахова🩺
@malahovatv · 2,1501 postПедиатр | Станислав Андриянов
@pediatr_andriyanov · 17,4301 postКАНАЛ ДЛЯ ТЕХ, КТО ХОЧЕТ ИЗМЕНИТЬ СВОЮ ЖИЗНЬ: ФИЗИЧЕСКУЮ, СЕКСУАЛЬНУЮ, МЕНТАЛЬНУЮ ФОРМУ! СТАТЬ ЛУЧШЕЙ ВЕРСИЕЙ СЕБЯ!
@transformation_mark · 1,5551 postУРОЛОГИЯ И МЕДИЦИНА - доктор Гадзиян.
@urolog_mark · 27,4721 postРентгенологический блог Ксении Андреевны
@ZamyatinaSchool · 11,7311 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@cardiolognovikova · 24,6221 postТревожный кардиолог
@docdari · 6,0651 postКаплина О.Ю., гинеколог, гемостазиолог & dr.gemogyn
@dr_gemogyn · 21,4411 postDr.iolanta
@dr_iolanta · 14,1541 postНикита Васильченко | Здоровье суставов
@dr_vasilchenko · 3,5301 postДиетолог | Атаманова Юлия | Эндокринолог
@drAtamanova · 3,7671 postИстории Доктора Долгушина
@drgrdolgushin · 13,6951 postПедиатр Имаева Людмила Уфа
@imaeva_pediatr · 3751 postПедиатр | Станислав Андриянов
@pediatr_andriyanov · 17,4301 postПедиатр | Забурунов Иван Сергеевич | Неонатальный реаниматолог |
@pediatr_Zaburunov · 1,1381 postврач маминой подруги
@raynbuldez · 22,6371 postУРОЛОГИЯ И МЕДИЦИНА - доктор Гадзиян.
@urolog_mark · 27,4721 postРентгенологический блог Ксении Андреевны
@ZamyatinaSchool · 11,7311 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@immunobee1 · 104,431#1
@pomoshnik_terapevta · 18,594#2
@mfcexpert_news · 29,481#3
@tersuperpower · 5,246#4
@ninavaccina · 89,822#5
@ag_kharitonov · 58,929#6
@studywithcardio · 14,798#7
@drbryk · 3,681#8
@medicine_for_sad · 4,858#9
@dr_bykanov · 62,430#10
@drnagorskaya · 8,646#11
@poyasni_za_med · 22,277#12
@mne_ts · 10,033#13
@pomoshnik_pediatra · 24,011#14
@OlegTalibov2 · 6,361#15
@olgagalkinadoc · 1,167#16
@survmed03 · 6,317#17
@mediq · 66,027#18
@dnevnikdoctora · 45,066#19
@readydoctor · 6,403#20
@doc_burlakov · 34,452#21
@pediatricschool · 5,892#22
@ayssmed · 13,443#23
@bakaevadoc · 9,059#24
@progressivnyj_klinicist · 10,991#25
@medach · 28,123#26
@iacmac · 3,855#27
@lectorium_air_40 · 9,476#28
@doc_kharchenko · 7,519#29
@icu_komi · 5,554#30
@clinresearch · 4,691#31
@funwithmedicine · 22,632#32
@maria_doc_pediatrician · 11,340#33
@medicina_discendi · 20,901#34
@ebm_base · 3,938#35
@infodoc · 18,690#36
@pediatriadocmaschool · 9,974#37
@docmaschool · 10,579#38
@drsaliseee · 5,693#39
@spnullityy · 5,777#40
@anesthesiologistrussia · 9,942#41
@ent_speech · 12,110#42
@pyrikov · 67,542#43
@headache_dr · 15,902#44
@pediatrhelp · 19,264#45
@oncofundamental · 8,875#46
@docdeti_docmed · 63,288#47
@MDschool_MDclub · 3,834#48
@ibs_doc · 21,430#49
@euatofficial · 8,979#50
@mediamedics · 143,134#51
@reclinlive · 30,121#52
@ordinatura_org · 24,313#53
@raynbuldez · 22,637#54
@mmaartaaaaa · 9,501#55
@DrButriy · 138,103#56
@ymirauotlubvii · 10,259#57
@juliemcberrytg · 2,176#58
@pocusmoscow · 7,997#59
@endoscopy_surgery · 15,537#60
@alikhandrodoc · 8,560#61
@ashurovmed · 10,718#62
@UTD_Russia · 7,915#63
@drisma1l · 5,516#64
@mila_yann · 8,484#65
@ZamyatinaSchool · 11,731#66
@cancer_care_weekly · 9,290#67
@womenhealth1pro · 9,349#68
@MGMUOptimus · 4,495#69
@sudmednotes · 169,020#70
@easymedicalschool · 3,066#71
@orda_air · 19,032#72
@drshnr · 37,212#73
@pivazyan_laura · 2,954#74
@restless_ecg · 8,971#75
@mudryidoctorKAA · 2,328#76
@doc2docclub · 5,235#77
@doctor_grebeshkova · 34,524#78
@cardiology_info · 18,324#79
@pribytkov_psy · 39,832#80
@doctor_galeeva · 28,550#81
@rmanpoacademy · 6,922#82
@doctor_kosa · 558#83
@CorgiUSMLE · 7,547#84
@sechenovec24 · 864#85
@sechenov_young · 3,949#86
@sechenov_ru · 22,284#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@synapse_channel1 · 40,050
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@gastrosasha95 · 40,285
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
@pyrikov · 67,542
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
@mediq · 66,027
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
@dr_bykanov · 62,430
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
@mfcexpert_news · 29,481
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@ybody · 40,913
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 29 August 2026
@doctor_grebeshkova · 34,524
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@mediamedics · 143,134
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@ag_kharitonov · 58,929
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 August 2026
@reclinlive · 30,121
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
@clinirec · 34,016
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@blog_kardiologa · 137,265
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин” (@tgnikitin), 44,638 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgnikitin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.