Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Запрещенный фармаколог 2.0

Channel

Запрещенный фармаколог 2.0

@OlegTalibov2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,368subscribers

+66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001921592481
TypeChannel
Username@OlegTalibov2
Created14 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OlegTalibov2

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,3026,3686,3356 August 2026 — 6,302 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,304 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,311 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,312 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,313 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,314 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,338 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,348 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,347 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,355 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,361 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,363 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,368 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,292–6,378 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:216,368+5
13 Sept 2026, 20:586,363+2
9 Sept 2026, 21:006,361+6
4 Sept 2026, 15:166,355+8
1 Sept 2026, 06:486,347-1
28 Aug 2026, 22:256,348+10
26 Aug 2026, 07:116,338+24
22 Aug 2026, 21:076,314+1
19 Aug 2026, 04:336,313+1
12 Aug 2026, 05:476,312+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:016,311+7
6 Aug 2026, 14:226,304+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:486,302first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,079 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
68532.9%
🔥53225.6%
👍39919.2%
🤣22110.6%
👏1607.70%
💊120.577%
😱120.577%
👻110.529%
🤪100.481%
🤯90.433%
👀80.385%
🤔60.289%
🎃50.241%
💯40.192%
30.144%
💩20.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 20 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OlegTalibov2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC751 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В отличие от турика или метана, метаболиты которых в норме отсутствуют, тестостерон есть в организме всегда. Задача лаборатории сводится к доказательству, что найденный Т имеет экзогенное происхождение. Для этого используется трехуровневая система. 1. Соотношение Тестостерон / Эпитестостерон (T/E ratio) Эпитестостерон, природный стереоизомер Т, синтезируется параллельно с Т в соотношении примерно 1:1, но не обладает

13👏8🔥6👍1

8 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,670 views59 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

37👍18👻2🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC≈3,680 views41 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Метандростенолон - святая святых, икона и одновременно главный эликсир утилизации здоровья для нескольких поколений школоты, подвальных качков и советских тяжелоатлетов. Снадобье обещало титанические мышцы, но впридачу дарило гинекомастию, печень размером с ведро и пожизненный абонемент в базу данных ВАДА. В мире качалки метан - это не просто стероид. Это базовая религия. Каждая школьная легенда о том, как «Димон за

20🔥13👏6👍2

5 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC≈2,280 views75 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Акне и вирилизация Спина превращается в кратерное поле, а если «метаху» решит попробовать женщина, у неё появятся баритон из под усов и клитор размером с гороховый стручок. Спортивная слава В 60-е и 70-е метан ели абсолютно все, от Арнольда Шварценеггера до копьеметателей и штангистов. Это было золотое время, когда допинг-контроль заключался в вопросе: «Пацаны, вы же ничего не принимали, да?» Но потом пришла эпоха х

40🔥20👏15

29 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC≈4,630 views46 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍24🔥148

28 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈4,560 views64 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Разговоры о "дизайнерских" стероидах не умолкают и по сей день. Есть такая городская легенда, согласно которой за любым успешным атлетом стоит команда яйцеголовых, разрабатывающих специально для него волшебные лекарства, о которых никто ничего не знает. ВАДА и этот вопрос решила с присущей ему незамысловатой прямотой, в алфавитном порядке перечислив в разделе S1 Запрещенного списка несколько десятков субстанций и доб

🔥3719👏8

27 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC≈2,400 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Выношу из дискуссии про анаболики, ибо совсем не про анаболики. Таня aka доктор Кирсанова заявила, что цепляние на шею всем финишерам на этих ваших масс-забегах медалек низводит ценность оных, равно как и спортивную составляющую мероприятия к нулю. Я почти согласился и предложил создать некое правило, в целях стремительной глобализации которого сформулированное сразу на английском. Tanya’s Rule Official Wording: Tan

28🤣16👍15🤪4🤯3💩2

27 Jul 2026, 05:30 UTC≈2,300 views88 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥51👍2411💊2

26 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,310 views101 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👏4131🔥23🤣6

26 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈7,200 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Обсуждать лечение гиперлипидемии и НПВП - тоска смертная. А тут еще по телевизору заблокированным ресурсам Crossfit Games’26 показывают. Посмотрел я и решил, что надо бы подробнее написать о веществах, которые использовать не то что не рекомендуется, а прямо-таки запрещено. Мы их в институтах не проходили, поэтому большинство коллег считают, что: 1) вещества эти употребляет только горстка упоротых маргиналов; 2) у ни

56👍21👏11🎃5🔥4

25 Jul 2026, 05:23 UTC≈2,920 views130 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Селективные ингибиторы COX‑2 - это НПВП для тех, кто очень боялся язвы, но в итоге получил инфаркт. Краткая история: хотели причинить добро, а причинили как всегда. В 90‑е годы, в то время, как на одной шестой части планеты люди боролись за начальный капитал, буржуи дотумкали до банальной истины. Раз уж COX‑1 делает простагландины для защиты слизистой и для тромбоцитов, а COX‑2 это злой агент воспаления, давайте у

70🔥36💊10👍73💯3😱1

19 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC≈3,660 views131 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥7925👍23👏2💯1🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OlegTalibov2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin · 44,506
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Смотровая Военврача
@dr_voenvrach · 44,530
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Бородатый не пробовал | доктор Бурлаков
@doc_burlakov · 34,435
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Запрещенный фармаколог 2.0” (@OlegTalibov2), 6,368 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OlegTalibov2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.