Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Здравхаб Игоря Воронцова

Channel

Здравхаб Игоря Воронцова

@HealthCoachIgor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,707subscribers

+965 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001758237221
TypeChannel
Username@HealthCoachIgor
DescriptionИгорь Воронцов. Худеем без подсчёта калорий, запретов и диетической шизы. Сон, стресс, кукуха, ресурсы — всё, из-за чего вес идёт по пизде. Мат 18+. Старт и лучшее — в закрепе. № 6636906506
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/HealthCoachIgor

Growth

19,67720,72520,2016 August 2026 — 19,742 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,709 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,700 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,690 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,677 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,718 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,706 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,722 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,737 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,727 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,866 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,051 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,083 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,104 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,270 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,516 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,642 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,665 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,693 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,700 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,694 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,702 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,725 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,718 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,707 subscribers20,7076 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +965. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,520–20,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 02:0420,707-11
1 Sept 2026, 00:4320,718-7
30 Aug 2026, 22:5320,725+23
29 Aug 2026, 22:0420,702+8
29 Aug 2026, 01:0320,694-6
28 Aug 2026, 00:2320,700+7
26 Aug 2026, 23:3720,693+28
25 Aug 2026, 22:2720,665+23
24 Aug 2026, 22:1920,642+126
23 Aug 2026, 10:2220,516+246
21 Aug 2026, 21:2620,270+166
20 Aug 2026, 15:4820,104+21
19 Aug 2026, 15:5220,083+32
18 Aug 2026, 18:5920,051+185
17 Aug 2026, 16:4719,866+139
16 Aug 2026, 08:3719,727-10
14 Aug 2026, 16:4919,737+15
13 Aug 2026, 07:5719,722+16
12 Aug 2026, 06:1519,706-12
11 Aug 2026, 08:4519,718first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 20,707 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,500
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held39 (19 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total70,126
Reactions total1,060
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
910
Videos
337
Links
486

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,178 reactions across 32 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40334.2%
🔥38933.0%
👍958.06%
💔857.22%
😱574.84%
😁252.12%
❤‍🔥242.04%
🥰242.04%
💯191.61%
😐151.27%
🏆141.19%
👌70.594%
🤣70.594%
👏50.424%
🌚20.17%
😢20.17%
🐳10.085%
👀10.085%
💘10.085%
😍10.085%
1 further kind10.085%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,622 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 39 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HealthCoachIgor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 06:36 UTC966 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ПОСТ ДЛЯ НОСТАЛЬГИИ👇 И сразу этот запах столовки, звон подносов и толкучка у раздачи. Кажется, вкус той самой пиццы и молочного коржика помнит сам язык 😂 Напишите в комментариях, по какому блюду скучаете сильнее всего, и киньте фото из школьных лет, если найдёте 😉

👍15❤‍🔥63

31 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,180 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ПРОДАЖИ В ZDRAWHUB ОТКРЫТЫ! 👇🏻 Сколько бабла вы уже всадили, чтобы так и не похудеть? 🤔 👉🏻Марафон у фитоняшки за 5к, где вы заебались давиться сухой грудкой 👉🏻Гуру-диетолог за 5к, который запретил хлеб и винчик. Вы продержались месяц на силе воли и ушли в жесткий зажор 👉🏻И, конечно, годовой абонемент в зал за 36к, куда вы сходили два раза, почувствовали себя жирным мешком на фоне качков и забили Вы слили десятки

4

28 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈1,900 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В КЛУБЕ СЕЙЧАС 69 ГРАДУСОВ ПО ФРЕЙДУ, А ТЫ ВСЁ ЕЩЕ МЕРЗНЕШЬ СНАРУЖИ? Пока ты там сидишь и грустишь по уходящему лету, в чате ZdrawHub уже вовсю идет жара: новички уже шерстят базу и закидывают меня вопросами 😁 ➕ Напоминаю для тех, кто в танке: 29.08 в 12:00 МСК ПРЯМОЙ ЭФИР Заморозка, варка и банки: что происходит с витаминами в сезонных продуктах Прыгай к нам, читай чат, смотри уроки и готовь свои вопросы к завтр

27 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈2,130 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

30 АВГУСТА ОТКРЫВАЮ ПРОДАЖИ В ZDRAWHUB, НО ТЫ МОЖЕШЬ ЗАЙТИ БЕСПЛАТНО ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС Через неделю начнется сентябрь: пробки, кружки, работа, стресс и вечный бытовой день сурка. Если в этом адском режиме ты попытаешься сесть на жесткую диету, то гарантированно сорвешься и наберешь еще больше. Поэтому я открываю для вас двери в ZDRAWHUB заранее 😏 И БЕСПЛАТНО на 3 дня Что вы получите: ➡️ Доступ к базе из 100+ материал

10🥰4

25 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈2,350 views183 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ВЫ ТОЖЕ ВЗВЕШИВАЕТЕСЬ ГОЛЫМИ, ЧТОБЫ ЦИФРА БЫЛА ПОТОЧНЕЕ? 😅 Утром бегом в туалет, скидываете всё до трусов, выдыхаете весь воздух и чуть дыша встаёте на весы. Потому что привес/отвес в 200 грамм задают настроение на весь день, да? 😐 Вот только любые весы, даже самые умные, взвешивают всё подряд: воду, соль от вчерашней селёдки, еду в кишечнике и отеки. За день вес легко скачет на 1–2 кг И это НЕ жир Вы просто по

🔥90💔6224👍6😁1

24 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,340 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Бля, я не могу не поделиться этим! Выше история Алены, полностью читайте там, я спойлерить не буду. Тут дам только обратку вам: Алена похудела без голодовок и дрочева с подсчетом ккал, потому что РАБОТАЛА С ГОЛОВОЙ! 🧠 Вы и так прекрасно знаете как худеть, что есть и сколько, вам тут мои советы нахуй не нужны. Но только в 99,99% случаев, это похудение строится на страдании, качелях и срывах. Потому что пиздец наск

👍155🔥4

24 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC≈2,030 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Чтож, половина пути пройдена, пришло время сказать в первый раз ОГРОМНОЕ СПАСИБО, потому что, наткнувшись на тебя в клипах в вк, у меня в голове что-то действительно перемкнуло🙈 Позади остались: больше 25 килограмм, несколько размеров одежды, выкинутый шкаф вещей и старая жизнь, осталось еще немного и я у цели)) Я не мучаю себя, ем что хочу (реально что хочу))), когда хочу и всё вот это🤭 А ты ломаешь стены в голов

👍9🔥9

23 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈2,270 views88 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

КАК ФАНТАЗИИ О ХУДОЙ ЖОПЕ МЕШАЮТ ВАМ ПОХУДЕТЬ 🍑 Блогеры годами ссут вам в уши своими марафонами желаний, где надо просто визуализировать себя стройной и вселенная сама там чего-то нашаманит. Но на практике эта хуйня только тормозит весь процесс👇 Габриэле Оттинген, профессор из Нью-Йоркского университета доказала: когда вы ярко фантазируете о цели, мозг расслабляется, засчитывает воображаемую победу как реальную, и

🔥74❤‍🔥94😁1

21 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC≈2,420 views41 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

КАК ПЕРЕСТАТЬ ПАРАНОИТЬ ИЗ-ЗА ЕДЫ И ВЕСОВ? 👇🏻 Результаты: 👉 Больше А: Надёжная привязанность. Вы адекватно оцениваете себя, еда для вас — просто еда. Красавчики! 👉 Больше Б: Тревожная привязанность. Вы ебете себе мозг контролем, вечно паникуете из-за еды и живете в замкнутом круге «стресс-срыв-вина». 👉 Больше В: Избегающая привязанность. Вы вообще забили хуй, потому что боитесь очередного провала и откатов веса.

24🔥14🌚2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @HealthCoachIgor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@HealthCoachIgor edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTCAnonymous Poll226 voters

Сколько совпадений?

  1. 0 совпадений21%
  2. 1-2 совпадения51%
  3. 3+ совпадений28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 328,373 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tanya Grape| авторская методика похудения
@playfami · 54,657
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Здравхаб Игоря Воронцова” (@HealthCoachIgor), 20,707 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HealthCoachIgor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.