Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for alexander__philippov

Channel

alexander__philippov

@coach_philippov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,049subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577706543
TypeChannel
Username@coach_philippov
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/coach_philippov

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,0009,0549,0276 August 2026 — 9,003 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,003 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,000 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,022 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,017 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,032 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,039 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,037 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,032 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,023 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,052 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,054 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,047 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,049 subscribers9,0496 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,992–9,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:019,049+2
15 Sept 2026, 00:029,047-7
11 Sept 2026, 13:599,054+2
6 Sept 2026, 23:599,052+29
2 Sept 2026, 00:349,023-9
29 Aug 2026, 14:139,032-5
26 Aug 2026, 05:129,037-2
23 Aug 2026, 12:549,039+7
20 Aug 2026, 01:519,032+15
16 Aug 2026, 20:099,017-5
13 Aug 2026, 06:289,022+22
10 Aug 2026, 09:109,000-3
6 Aug 2026, 22:159,003no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:039,003first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 9,049 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held40 (25 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total3,090
Reactions total299
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,001 reactions across 39 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,32533.1%
🔥1,02525.6%
👍44911.2%
😁43510.9%
💯3719.27%
❤‍🔥1182.95%
👏902.25%
🤩441.10%
😍370.925%
🏆290.725%
👌240.6%
🥰240.6%
😱80.2%
🤯70.175%
🙏60.15%
🤔50.125%
🫡30.075%
😢10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,001 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 40 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coach_philippov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,330 views138 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

IFBB ELITE PRO Елена Бобичева в #philippov_body. ☺️ начнем день с красоты

🔥93😍28🥰9🤩3👏2🤔2🏆1

Signed Alexander Philippov

25 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,760 views161 reactionsread 28 August 2026

С приближением соревновательного сезона - актуально как никогда 😁. Возможно будет немного больно. 1) Далеко не факт что из вас получится чемпион. Даже просто хороший соревнующийся атлет - не факт. Астрофизик же не получился, так почему вы думаете что со спортом проще. 🫤 2)Помимо очевидных антропометрических данных, есть сотни неочевидных параметров, лимитирующих доступный вам максимум. Например: человек с ЖКТ, нес

❤‍🔥7836👍25💯12🔥8👏2

Signed Alexander Philippov

20 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈2,480 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026

На частном канале новый набор тренировочных программ, рецепты и сегодня будет третий вебинар 🙌 http://t.me/Philippov_bot

17👍14🤩3

Signed Alexander Philippov

19 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,660 views69 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Это для тех, кто мне говорит что 300 углей это хоть насколько-нибудь много 🤷

35👍17😁14👏3

Signed Alexander Philippov

19 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,660 views96 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥62🤩16👍14🤯4

Signed Alexander Philippov

19 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,460 views40 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Тут в очередной раз, отвлекаясь от пива 🤣, пришлось поучаствовать в дебатах молодых коллег относительно нормирования количества потребляемых углеводов 🫩 Чуть не сдуло потоками воздуха, чесслово. Чтобы им было чем заняться -> подсунул табличку расчета суточной калорийности времен СССР. Подло хихикал 👇

24😁14👍1👏1

Signed Alexander Philippov

19 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈2,410 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://music.yandex.ru/album/43283134/track/154953892?utm_medium=copy_link&ref_id=93e01941-90c9-4b89-a3ac-243b78035125 Новый выпуск моего подкаста уже на Яндекс.Музыке Говорим о правилах подбора упражнений ☺️🫡

🔥388🏆2👍1

Signed Alexander Philippov

17 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC≈2,760 views226 reactionsread 28 August 2026

⁉️Прилетел тут вопрос: за последние 2 недели (отпуск) набрала 5 кг. Последние пару лет живу в режиме качелей: усиленные тренировки , ограничения в питании, далее срыв и набор ещё больше чем было. Очень устала от этого. Может быть кто то был в подобной ситуации? Как удалось победить ? К психологам ходила, не очень результативно. ⚠️Вот этот вопрос достоин отдельного текста. Давайте начнём с базисов физиологии и психо

140🔥61🏆14💯8👍2❤‍🔥1

Signed Alexander Philippov

15 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈2,700 views121 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

60💯30👍25👏3🔥3

Signed Alexander Philippov

14 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,780 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

В. Р. Малкин и Л. Н.Рогалева "Психотехнологии в спорте" Полезно будет для тех из вас, кто плотненько задумывается о подготовке соревнующихся атлетов и не знает как именно их лучше пытать 😁🫡 Разберетесь, я думаю )

41🔥17🙏5👍1🤔1🤩1😁1

Signed Alexander Philippov

13 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈3,000 views157 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А это Лера для позитивного закрепления. Люблю свою работу ☺️🫡

🔥125🤩16🏆87😍1

Signed Alexander Philippov

13 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,770 views66 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Но курс по тренировке ягодиц таки перепишу полностью и расширю. О старте регистрации сообщу обязательно 🫡

👍4816🏆2

Signed Alexander Philippov

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @coach_philippov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTCAnonymous Poll412 voters

И кстати. Оптимальная длительность выпуска для вас

  1. До 20 минут23%
  2. До 40 минут38%
  3. До часа39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Павел Баранов. Эндокринология/диетология.
@pavelbaranov_md · 31,179
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
FIT ENVOY
@fit_envoy · 24,480
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Александр Семенов
@trenersemenov · 22,844
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Физикл | Олег Зингилевский
@fiztransform · 149,423
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Nikiforov team
@nikiforov_t · 35,119
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
Павел Тулюпа
@tulupavel_fit · 70,707
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Доктор Епифанов | Невролог| Все о позвоночнике
@epifanovnews · 49,144
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
ONLYFITS
@onlyfits_club · 22,740
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Мудрость Фитнеса (тренер Кабуров)
@fitness_mayatnik · 25,728
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
MILANI SERGEEVNA
@pantherkaM · 25,156
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026
Sofia Maloletova
@Sofia_Malolet · 22,077
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
ПП Еда | Диеты | Рационы
@dietfood_web · 37,729
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
Скоромный
@Skoromnyy · 22,173
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
Бородатый не пробовал | доктор Бурлаков
@doc_burlakov · 34,435
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“alexander__philippov” (@coach_philippov), 9,049 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coach_philippov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.