Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мракоборец - еда без запретов

Channel

Мракоборец - еда без запретов

@bodyscience_crew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,888subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001408945939
TypeChannel
Username@bodyscience_crew
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bodyscience_crew

Growth

10,88810,95510,921.57 August 2026 — 10,955 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,955 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,954 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,948 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,945 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,937 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,932 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,930 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,926 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,923 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,915 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,914 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,907 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,909 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,907 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,909 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,905 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,902 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,898 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,895 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,894 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,895 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,888 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 31 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,878–10,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 01:2010,888-7
4 Sept 2026, 08:0010,895+1
1 Sept 2026, 18:3410,894-1
30 Aug 2026, 19:0910,895-3
28 Aug 2026, 20:4310,898-4
27 Aug 2026, 23:2410,902-3
27 Aug 2026, 00:4810,905-4
24 Aug 2026, 19:1510,909+2
23 Aug 2026, 05:3410,907-2
21 Aug 2026, 13:5410,909+2
19 Aug 2026, 12:4510,907-7
18 Aug 2026, 10:2210,914-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:2710,915-8
16 Aug 2026, 04:0710,923-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:3610,926-4
13 Aug 2026, 03:1610,930-2
12 Aug 2026, 02:1210,932-5
11 Aug 2026, 03:1610,937-8
10 Aug 2026, 00:0310,945-3
8 Aug 2026, 21:0610,948first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 10,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held30 (1 July 202630 August 2026)
Views total21,298
Reactions total872
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28m 28s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,803 reactions across 30 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥82245.6%
👍55130.6%
🤣23513.0%
❤‍🔥794.38%
👏723.99%
💯231.28%
🤝70.388%
🤯60.333%
🙏40.222%
😱20.111%
🤩20.111%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bodyscience_crew. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC828 views66 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥46👍16👏4

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

28 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,020 views37 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍18❤‍🔥16🔥3

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

27 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,150 views40 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

- здесь худеют с дефицитом калорий; - здесь не боятся и любят углеводы; - здесь даже перекусывают; - и сладости не запрещают; - здесь «не лечат» инсулинорезистентность, просто убирают; - здесь не разводят на анализы и не пичкают БАДами, но трескают фрукты, овощи и вкусную еду; - здесь нет тупорылых магических ритуалов, но все эффективно стройнеют, здОрово и комфортно! - здесь приобретают стойкий иммунитет к дичи и к

👍24🤣11❤‍🔥3🔥2

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

26 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,230 views40 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

⁉️ Кортизол - это жизненно важный стероидный гормон, вырабатываемый корой надпочечников, который действует как основной стрессовый менеджер организма: ✅ Работает с адреналином для повышения частоты сердечных сокращений, артериального давления и бдительности в ответ на опасность или стресс. ✅ Поддерживает уровень глюкозы в крови: чрез глюконеогенез в печени - созданию новой глюкозы в печени из жиров или подстегивая г

🔥23👍13🤣4

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

24 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈1,400 views63 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Паразитоз - редкое и крайне сложное заболевание. Никакими злое@учими чистками, травами, настойками и биодобавками не лечится. Если вас угораздило, идите к врачу-паразитологу (НЕ превентивно-интегративному), а не к инфлюенсерам 3.14здежа, промышляющим шарлатанскими «уникальными авторскими» методами чистки всего и вся, будто организм наш, это канализация…

👍41🔥15❤‍🔥7

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

24 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC≈1,420 views32 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Интервальное голодание - не волшебная таблЭтка с эффектом омоложения, переключения метаболизма и, прости Господи, запуска аутофагии (мифу миллион лет в обед, но невменяшки всё толкают эту дичь) ;)) Интервальное голодание работает ровно тогда, когда в пищевое окно (неважно, 16:8, 14:10, 12:12, неважно, в какое время оно откроется и закроется) вы потребите мЕньшее количество калорий, нежели тратите в повседневной акти

🔥22👍10

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

19 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈2,070 views77 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Сколько же надо потреблять углеводов? чтобы не быть голословным, приведу результаты мета-анализа, опубликованного в авторитетном научном журнале The Lancet (PMID: 30122560), охватившему более 400 000 человек: - Минимальный риск преждевременной смерти наблюдался при потреблении углеводов — 50–55% от общей калорийности суточного рациона. - Низкое потребление (<40% от калорийности): Значительно увеличивает риск смертн

👍57🔥16🤯4

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

16 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈2,150 views94 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍52🔥35👏4🤣3

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

16 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈2,080 views99 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Набор лишнего веса - - это ВСЕГДА ПРОФИЦИТ КАЛОРИЙ. Проще говоря - переедание. Точка! Время приема пищи, энергия, бл@ть солнца, расположение планет и знаки зодиака, йопт, НИКАК не влияют на состав тела. Это ВСЕГДА твоя ленивая жепка и два ведра чего-то там.

🔥55🤣32👍9❤‍🔥3

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

16 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,980 views51 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Из каждой превентивной клоаки мы слышим про альфа-липоевую кислоту, как моооощный Вася жиросжигатель… У реальной науки же иные данные - крупные метаанализы и РКИ демонстрируют ну оооочень скромные результаты (мягко говоря): - Минимальная потеря веса: разница с группой плацебо либо отсутствует, либо настолько минимальна на дистанции в пол года, что на нее можно не смотреть + путаница в контроле. - Отсутствие влияния

👍31👏13🔥7

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

10 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,120 views104 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Еда, опухоль и рак… Без комментариев

🤣79🔥14👍7🤯2😱2

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

10 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,900 views97 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Отъе6итесь от фруктов!!! Все фрукты низкокалорийны - ниже 100 ккал на 100 продукта, и наесть «сахар» из них достаточно проблематично, особливо, учитывая, что это не добавленные сахара, которые рекомендуется сократить в рационе. Употребление фруктов ассоциировано с профилактикой ожирения, диабета, сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний и тд и тп - смотри источники в закрепленном комментарии. При проблемах с жтк, во время при

🔥78👍15🤣4

Signed Мракоборец Алексей Варфоломеев

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @bodyscience_crew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бородатый не пробовал | доктор Бурлаков
@doc_burlakov · 34,452
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
Павел Баранов. Эндокринология/диетология.
@pavelbaranov_md · 31,166
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Страшная химия
@chemistrybyolga · 32,895
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
СЪЕДОБНЫЙ НАУЧПОП
@e_semika · 46,023
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Саша
@gastrosasha95 · 40,321
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
Смотровая Военврача
@dr_voenvrach · 44,504
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Тренер Артём
@trener_artem · 55,844
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Доктор Комиссарова ☀️
@doctor_komissarova · 97,496
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Терапевт & Гастроэнтеролог
@doctor_sitkina · 42,156
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА ФРАНЦ про ХИМИЮ
@chemistry_frants · 45,410
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Физикл | Олег Зингилевский
@fiztransform · 149,343
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Дерматология Быканова
@dr_bykanov · 62,461
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Доктор Молодой
@doctor_dmolodoy · 61,983
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
ДОКТОР ХАН
@doctorkhanstanislav · 56,783
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
ImmunoBee
@immunobee1 · 104,442
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Доктор Гребешкова
@doctor_grebeshkova · 34,572
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Лопатина М.В.
@gastrogram · 36,980
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
MarysStories
@Marys_stories · 31,736
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
Пей таблетки! | MedIQLab
@mediq · 66,038
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
VLADLENAFIT
@vladlenafit · 32,962
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
Гастроэнтеролог ХАРИТОНОВ Андрей Геннадьевич
@ag_kharitonov · 58,929
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 August 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 137,258
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
dnevnikdoctora
@dnevnikdoctora · 45,066
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Максим Кузнецов - Врач эндокринолог
@medic_smith · 147,448
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мракоборец - еда без запретов” (@bodyscience_crew), 10,888 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bodyscience_crew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.