Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Doc_shilo

Channel

Doc_shilo

@clinresearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,691subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001179994683
TypeChannel
Username@clinresearch
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/clinresearch

Growth

4,6664,6914,678.55 August 2026 — 4,666 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,666 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,677 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,679 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,682 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,680 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,682 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,686 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,682 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,689 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,691 subscribers5 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 34 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,662–4,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 09:194,691+2
4 Sept 2026, 07:014,689+7
1 Sept 2026, 05:454,682-4
29 Aug 2026, 02:254,686+4
26 Aug 2026, 08:244,682+2
23 Aug 2026, 15:554,680-2
19 Aug 2026, 19:334,682+3
12 Aug 2026, 16:044,679+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:314,677+11
6 Aug 2026, 03:524,666no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:014,666first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

472 reactions across 21 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26656.4%
🔥9520.1%
🎉398.26%
👍388.05%
❤‍🔥173.60%
🤝61.27%
🤩51.06%
👏20.424%
🫡20.424%
🕊10.212%
🦄10.212%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC410 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Друзья, приглашаем вас на событие, в котором соединятся искусство и благотворительность ❤️

🔥32🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC423 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vse_ne_naprasnoPhoto

Друзья, приглашаем вас 13 августа на особенный благотворительный вечер «Искусство видеть главное», который пройдет в поддержку фонда «Не напрасно». Все собранные средства направятся на программы помощи людям с онкологическими заболеваниями. Мы соберемся в символичном месте — центре современной офтальмологии «Зрение», где каждый день возвращают людям ясность взгляда, — чтобы вместе сфокусироваться на будущем без стра

10👍7

28 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC≈1,090 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мой комментарий опубликовали в JAMA Oncology в формате Letter to the Editor 🎉 Не зря грызём гранит науки 😄 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/article-abstract/2851995

46🔥28🤩5🤝4

26 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 12 August 2026

Как найти идею научного исследования, если ничего гениального в голову не приходит? Многие врачи хотят заниматься наукой. Но часто эта мысль довольно абстрактна и расплывчата. И люди приходят на курсы по статистике с абстрактной мыслью о том, что когда-нибудь можно было бы сделать исследование. А иногда даже без этой мысли 😄 В итоге учиться не очень интересно, потому что нет собственной идеи, которая действительн

23 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,270 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На этих выходных мы выпустили X (😱😱😱) набор Высшей школы онкологии! 18 замечательных думающих врачей, которые вписались в два года тяжкого труда во имя знаний 💔 восхищаюсь каждым А сейчас мы принимаем заявки уже в 12 набор! Подать документы можно до конца месяца: https://higherschoolofoncology.ru/admission Ну и если этого недостаточно - можно принять участие в нашей олимпиаде HSO GAMES 3.0. Регистрация на отборочны

🔥11❤‍🔥105🤝2🫡2👏1🦄1

10 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,940 views153 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

33 🪐 Сегодня поймала себя на ощущении, что у меня есть всё, что нужно для счастья. И в этот день не хочется никуда бежать, не хочется ничего особенного, потому что всё уже на своих местах. Желаю каждому поймать это ощущение и не отпускать ❤️ Лучшим поздравлением для меня будет, если вы поддержите благотворительный фонд 'Не напрасно' который каждый день помогает пациентам с онкологическими заболеваниями. https://

99🎉39🔥14👏1

1 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,870 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Техническое объявление для пациентов Дорогие пациенты, я на совсем немножечко вышла на очные приёмы. Принимаю всё там же, клиника Лахта, Санкт-Петербург. Если вы хотели увидеться очно - по ссылке можно оставить заявку, и с вами свяжется наш медицинский координатор ❤️ https://lahtaclinic.ru/doctor/shilo_polina/

13

26 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,900 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduppro

Скоро наш праздник, и мы подготовили подарки для настоящих врачей-душнил🤓 Мы решили подарить вам бесплатные билетики на занятия Научного клуба МедАп. 🎫 Билет первый — журнальный клуб с Полиной Шило 30.06 в 18:00 Будем анализировать свежее российское исследование МЕГА (Мексидол при СДВГ у детей). Дизайн — почти как по учебнику. Но значит ли это, что препарат работает? Учимся отделять качество методологии от качест

8

26 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,490 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ласт колл Сегодня последний день, когда можно зарегистрироваться на одно из двух открытых мероприятий научного клуба MedUp ❤️

3

24 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,570 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Коллеги, в четверг 25 июня в 19.00 проведу открытый вебинар по интерпретации научных исследований о молекулярно-генетическом тестировании в онкологии (в рамках вышеобозначенной серии вебинаров). Поговорим о том, что такое «хороший диагностический тест», через какие этапы исследований эти тесты должны пройти, и на что обращать внимание при чтении статей по этим темам. Ждем коллег, неравнодушных к науке 💙 Участие бе

🔥7

20 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,760 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Тревожность у врача - это...

  1. Скорее полезная черта характера39%
  2. Скорее вредная черта характера64%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6

20 Jun 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,540 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тревожный врач - это хорошо или плохо? Готовилась к молодёжному онкологическому саммиту, и в процессе родился неоднозначный вопрос из заголовка. Я слышала абсолютно разные мнения - от "ужас-ужас" до "только так и должно быть. Хочу поисследовать общественное мнение 🌚 проголосуйте, пожалуйста, и можно аргументировать в комментариях. А я потом поделюсь данными исследований 👌

9👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @clinresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTCAnonymous Poll300 voters

Тревожность у врача - это...

  1. Скорее полезная черта характера39%
  2. Скорее вредная черта характера64%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дерматоонколог Бейнусов
@dmitry_beinusov · 31,461
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Dr.Ivashkov
@drivashkov · 33,945
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin · 44,638
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
ГЛАВНЫЙ ОНКОЛОГ Андрей КАПРИН
@ADKaprin · 32,236
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Юрист для врача Ангелина Романовская
@mfcexpert_news · 29,481
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Doc_shilo” (@clinresearch), 4,691 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clinresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.