И я вас прошу, смотрите с кем общаетесь Единственный личный аккаунт указан в шапке профиля Одна лишняя буква и вы скидываете деньги непонятно кому
🥰41❤33😱20

Channel
@dnevnikdoctora
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,050subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001540249590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnevnikdoctora |
| Created | 24 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnevnikdoctora |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 45,050 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 45,046 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 45,038 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 45,044 | +16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 45,028 | -38 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 45,066 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 45,070 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 45,073 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 45,077 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 45,072 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 45,069 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 45,068 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 45,071 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 45,067 | -24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 45,091 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 45,104 | +9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 45,095 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 45,091 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 45,097 | +11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 45,086 | first reading |
81 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 81 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25,115 reactions across 79 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,430 | 41.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5,144 | 20.5% | |
| 😁 | 4,156 | 16.5% | |
| 👍 | 3,363 | 13.4% | |
| 🥰 | 593 | 2.36% | |
| 😱 | 477 | 1.90% | |
| 👏 | 455 | 1.81% | |
| 😢 | 407 | 1.62% | |
| 🤩 | 69 | 0.275% | |
| 🎉 | 21 | 0.084% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dnevnikdoctora. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 81 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
И я вас прошу, смотрите с кем общаетесь Единственный личный аккаунт указан в шапке профиля Одна лишняя буква и вы скидываете деньги непонятно кому
🥰41❤33😱20
dnevnikdoctora pinned a photo
❗️ Объява. Мошенники создали фейковую группу и внесли туда всех читателей канала и кого-то из нечитателей тоже внесли. Название dnevnikdoctora, но это не канал, группа. Приторговывают какой-то дичью. Тех поддержка Телеграм бездействует. Нужно покинуть группу и пожаловаться. Я к этому аккаунту не имею никакого отношения.
❤77🔥28😱15😁1
В продолжение разговора. Наука ищет, сомневается, признает ошибки, и лишь у шарлатанов все просто и стабильно аж с 1948 года. Ответ Надежды Стрелец врачам таков и более никаков. И он, конечно, потрясающий, тут тебе и: ✅ апелляция к популярности Количество аудитории и монетизация - метрики успешного инфобизнеса, а не медицинской эффективности. Врачей возмущает не чужой доход, а то, что колоссальный медийный ресурс …
❤225🔥84👏52👍12🥰3
Я поныть Такое ощущение, что школьники на 176 см заканчиваются А мой школьник уже 180+ Но весом 50 кг😂 Где найти аутфит на дрыща? Есть какие-то проверенные шмотки категории слим?
😁140❤39😱12😢4🥰1
Что ж, давайте разберем эту претензию. Запомните, развитие - это ДИСКОМФОРТ. Всегда. Возмущаться тем, что медицинские рекомендации меняются, означает требовать от науки того, что она давать не должна: вечных догм. Если нужны неизменные истины, которые не утомляют и не требуют переучивания, стоит обращаться к религии или эзотерике, а также шарлатанами формата «возьмите простой советский...», научно обоснованная меди…
❤253👍64🔥45👏7🥰5
Воспаление и атеросклероз Недавно были подведены итоги исследования ZEUS, в котором тестировалось моноклональное антитело, блокирующее провоспалительный белок интерлейкин-6. Препарат исследовали на людях с заболеваниями артерий, ХБП и высоким уровнем С-реактивного белка. Препарат отлично справился со своей прямой задачей, значительно снизил уровень воспалительных маркеров в крови (IL-6 и вч-CРБ), но клинический рез…
🔥102❤59👍31🥰1
Пост для улучшения коммуникации «Врач-пациент». ЭТО НОРМАЛЬНО: ✔️Нормально, когда врач говорит: «Я не уверен, мне нужно дополнительное мнение коллег»; ✔️«Мы не знаем, почему возникает это заболевание, но мы знаем механизмы его возникновения и можем его контролировать»; ✔️«Ваша ситуация не однозначна, можно поступить так, а можно - вот так. Сейчас мы вместе выберем тактику. Я склоняюсь к такому варианту, потому чт…
🔥244❤135👍50👏12🥰4
7 ГРЕХОВ МЕДИЦИНЫ - статья, которой больше полувека, обрела вторую популярность в иностранных медицинских медиа. Ричарда Эшера, выдающегося британского эндокринолога и гематолога, помнят за его острые, провокационные труды, 7 грехов - одна из его самых популярных статей в журнале The Lancet 1949 г. Итак, грехи, негативно влияющие на качество лечения пациентов: 1⃣ Неясность (Obscurity) Использование тяжелого медиц…
👍135🔥80❤59😁16🥰3
Август - это как вечер воскресенья
❤165😢63🔥40👍10👏2🥰2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥115❤58👍20🥰6👏1
Рубрика #дорогая_редакция (или #нам_пишут) ⏺ Дело в том, что ниацин (=никотиновая кислота)* действительно снижает уровень общего холестерина и холестерина липопротеинов низкой плотности. ⏺ Однако в клинических исследованиях было доказано, что несмотря на это, ниацин повышает риск сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. Парадокс? Оказалось, что это происходит потому, что конечные метаболиты ниацина способствуют воспалению …
❤208🔥50👍24
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @dnevnikdoctora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@dnevnikdoctora edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dnevnikdoctora” (@dnevnikdoctora), 45,050 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevnikdoctora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.