•Быстро,весело,понятно!
•Черный пояс по гормонам
•Обезжириваю людей без диет
/сотрудничество @juliavitchinnik/
Регистрация в перечне страниц в соцсетях РКН:
🔗https://knd.gov.ru/license?
id=67360f7415601c23cb24480f®istryType=bloggersPermission
А+
Created
10 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 34 days, net +2,180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145,568–148,402 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 19:39
148,075
+627
5 Sept 2026, 15:01
147,448
+393
3 Sept 2026, 17:37
147,055
-31
2 Sept 2026, 08:08
147,086
-24
1 Sept 2026, 08:48
147,110
-44
31 Aug 2026, 07:52
147,154
-40
30 Aug 2026, 09:37
147,194
+13
29 Aug 2026, 08:07
147,181
-46
28 Aug 2026, 09:03
147,227
-70
27 Aug 2026, 07:34
147,297
+15
26 Aug 2026, 07:54
147,282
+53
25 Aug 2026, 11:25
147,229
-6
24 Aug 2026, 13:53
147,235
+1
22 Aug 2026, 23:23
147,234
+101
21 Aug 2026, 12:17
147,133
+9
20 Aug 2026, 11:54
147,124
+53
19 Aug 2026, 08:28
147,071
+12
18 Aug 2026, 11:28
147,059
+18
17 Aug 2026, 10:33
147,041
+76
15 Aug 2026, 18:58
146,965
first reading
Engagement
92 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.16%
avg views ÷ 148,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,120
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 92 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
92 (3 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
611,250
Reactions total
7,791
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 19:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,050
Videos
≈526
Links
≈674
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 49s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,569 reactions across 88 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,215
36.4%
👍
3,521
30.4%
🔥
1,971
17.0%
😁
927
8.01%
💯
370
3.20%
👏
240
2.07%
🥰
96
0.83%
❤🔥
66
0.57%
🤔
47
0.406%
🙏
29
0.251%
😍
27
0.233%
🤩
17
0.147%
👌
16
0.138%
😱
10
0.086%
👎
6
0.052%
😢
3
0.026%
🤯
3
0.026%
🤗
2
0.017%
🐳
1
0.009%
🕊
1
0.009%
1 further kind
1
0.009%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,077 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 90 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @medic_smith. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣ Даю прямую ссылку на трансляцию для всех, кто не смог зайти в канал марафона
Успевайте подключиться, мы уже начали ⬇️
https://school.medicsmith.ru/web_marafon?utm_source=vrach_tg
Если страница не грузится или выдает ошибку — отключите VPN или скопируйте ссылку и откройте её в другом браузере.
https://school.medicsmith.ru/web_marafon?utm_source=vrach_tg
Жду всех онлайн!
«Да ты просто начни» — когда говорят эту фразу, хочется невольно закатить глаза 😆
⠀
Но история Анны из Ульяновска — участницы бесплатного марафона «Ешь и худей» и курса «Обезжириватель» началась именно с неё.
⠀⠀
Она тот самый пример, который показывает: иногда один марафон способен включить такие процессы, что уже невозможно остановиться🔥
⠀
Как у многих, всё началось… с тарелки:
⠀
«Первые тарелки были похожи на тазы …
Граждане, проверка связи! Собираю "Анамнез" своих соц.сетей со всеми сбоями)))
⠀
Вы видели анонс бесплатного марафона "Ешь и худей"?
Конечно, я уже там!24%
Нет, а что за марафон?33%
Я не иду23%
Тык-тык22%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кто больше всех "боится" открыто говорить о своих проблемах с весом и худеть?
Мужчины, простите, но я это скажу))) Это мы. Женщинами и их рвением быть лучше, здоровее и говорить о своих проблемах я восхищаюсь 🔥
Именно от мужчин постоянно слышу: "Все эти похудайки, марафоны и курсы — дело женское, я там у вас с голоду помру. А вот мне только качалка, железо и сушка."
Выбрасываем этот мусор из головы, смотрим на тар…
Когда вокруг тревожно, холодильник почему-то становится самым доступным психологом
В такие моменты особенно легко сказать себе: «Да ладно, съем что-нибудь вкусное — хоть немного отвлекусь». Я понимаю, что вы чувствуете и почему так сильно вечером тянет к тортику. Стресс действительно может менять пищевое поведение и подталкивать к более калорийной, сладкой и «комфортной» еде.
Но стресс закончится, а наеденные на ег…
С уколами или без — законы организма работают одинаково
⠀
История Александры — яркий пример того, что ни одна «волшебная таблетка» не сработает, если внутри нет базовой системы питания и понимания своей психологии.
⠀
Разбирать уколы, гормоны, возрастной метаболизм и, главное, учить вас худеть сытно, без срывов и откатов я буду на бесплатном марафоне «Ешь и худей».
⠀
Стартуем уже 7 сентября, но движ в канале и чате ма…
Почему вес стоит на месте даже на препаратах?
Моя подписчица Александра уже год принимает препарат по назначению врача, но вес стоит или растет, а попытки снизить аппетит оборачиваются резкими приступами голода, слабостью и агрессией.
Ситуация, когда сильные препараты (группы агонистов ГПП-1, такие как Семавик, Оземпик и др.) не дают ожидаемого эффекта, встречается часто.
Разберем 3 основные причины, почему так пр…
Люблю продукты, которые появляются дома сами.
Кабачки 🍆
Купил один - через пару дней их уже пять. Зашел в гости к родственникам или друзьям - поздравляю, теперь их десять 🤣
Собрал 4 простых рецепта с кабачками, для которых не придется полдня стоять у плиты. Смотрите карточки!
Любите? Как готовили чаще всего в этом сезоне?
У меня есть ответы на все вопросы, которые так вас тревожат:
🔵 вечерний «жор»,
🔵 вес, который упрямо стоит,
🔵 страх перед едой,
🔵 и даже то, о чем вы не можете сказать вслух.
Мне хочется дать направление каждому из вас, но в формате коротких сообщений это просто невозможно.
Именно поэтому я зову вас на бесплатный марафон «Ешь и худей», где мы с коллегами готовы поделиться нашим опытом, инструментами и дать поддержк…
👍37❤18🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @medic_smith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@medic_smith edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Граждане, проверка связи! Собираю "Анамнез" своих соц.сетей со всеми сбоями)))
⠀
Вы видели анонс бесплатного марафона "Ешь и худей"?
Конечно, я уже там!24%
Нет, а что за марафон?33%
Я не иду23%
Тык-тык22%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Граждане, как думаете, какой дефицит самый женский? 👇
Витамины группы В12%
Магний10%
Железо76%
Витамин D10%
Цинк5%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
UpToDate | Русский АпТуДейт | Сервисы для врачей и исследователей @UTD_Russia · 7,915#98
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Эндокринолог ❤️ Ольга Павлова 💊 Диабет @dia_dietolog_olga_pavlova · 59,378 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Терапевт & Гастроэнтеролог @doctor_sitkina · 42,156 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Инна Тулина хирург онколог, кмн @inna_tulina_a · 30,160 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺 @blog_kardiologa · 137,265 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Nice&Easy / Нутрициолог Дарья Савельева @perekusovnet · 39,708 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Максим Кузнецов - Врач эндокринолог” (@medic_smith), 148,075 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medic_smith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.