Photo, posted without a caption
❤126👍25🔥5

Channel
@sovetdaymotiv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,895subscribers
-186 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001299239079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sovetdaymotiv |
| Description | Мария Евдокимова. ЛОР-врач, health-коуч, нутрициолог, сооснователь МЦ «Моя Клиника», Ростов-на-Дону - первой доказательной клиники на Юге России. Здесь научно-обоснованная медицина и честная превентивная медицина с научной базой, без мракобесия. |
| Created | 12 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sovetdaymotiv |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 23,895 | -21 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 23,916 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 23,927 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 23,937 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 23,943 | -19 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 23,962 | -5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 23,967 | -18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 23,985 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 23,987 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:34 | 23,994 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 23,999 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 24,001 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 24,004 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 24,007 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 24,011 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 24,014 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 24,013 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 24,012 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 24,015 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 24,018 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (27 June 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 47,630 |
| Reactions total | 1,889 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 00:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,439 reactions across 47 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,134 | 57.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1,976 | 15.9% | |
| 🎉 | 1,108 | 8.91% | |
| 👍 | 1,060 | 8.52% | |
| 💯 | 322 | 2.59% | |
| 👏 | 258 | 2.07% | |
| 💔 | 153 | 1.23% | |
| 🍾 | 85 | 0.683% | |
| ❤🔥 | 74 | 0.595% | |
| 🏆 | 71 | 0.571% | |
| 🤝 | 47 | 0.378% | |
| 😍 | 38 | 0.305% | |
| 😭 | 33 | 0.265% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 0.137% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 0.105% | |
| 🙈 | 12 | 0.096% | |
| 🤩 | 10 | 0.08% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 0.056% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 0.048% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.048% | |
| 3 further kinds | 9 | 0.072% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,439 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sovetdaymotiv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤126👍25🔥5
File, posted without a caption
❤94🏆13👍12💔3
Кому нужна после статей про осанку визуализация, моя подписчица сделала прекрасный файл с картинками, за что ей большое спасибо.
❤🔥57❤25🤝12
«Моя клиника» приглашает вас на мероприятие, где мы разберем акне с разных сторон! Когда: 27 сентября (воскресенье) в 15:00 📍 Где: г. Ростов-на-Дону, пр. Буденновский, д. 59, «Маринс Парк Отель», зал «Сочи» 💰 Участие: Бесплатно (начало в 14:30 с приветственного кофе-брейка) Что вас ждет: 🧑⚕️ Полина Лозовая (гастроэнтеролог) расскажет об образе жизни при акне: есть ли реальная связь с ЖКТ, какие продукты усугубляют …
❤42❤🔥12💔2
Поэтому после ожога она хуже справляется с дополнительной нагрузкой и нуждается в защите и времени на восстановление. Что можно сделать? ◾️ Уйти с солнца и не подвергать обгоревшую кожу новому ультрафиолету. ◾️Охладить кожу прохладным душем или компрессом - только без льда непосредственно на кожу, ради Бога ◾️Использовать нейтральный увлажняющий крем или эмолент ◾️Пить достаточно жидкости, особенно если площадь ожо…
❤70👍11🤣1
Чем вообще опасны солнечные ожоги для кожи? Лето, конечно, закончилось, но писать о нем можно продолжать). Что такое ожог по сути? Это видимое повреждение кожи ультрафиолетовым излучением. Конечно, если вы пару раз получили солнечный ожог, никакой катастрофы или рака кожи не будет, вопрос в регулярности. А вот повторяющиеся ожоги, особенно сильные, с болью, волдырями и шелушением - накапливают повреждение. Какой м…
❤61👍13🤣1
Posted without readable text
👍61❤34
Как выбирают антибиотик? Про выбор антибиотика сегодня поговорим в очередной раз. Как вообще мы выбираем, какой назначить антибиотик, и какие есть нюансы и мифы? Ну, во первых, антибиотик выбирают не по принципу «этот мне уже помогал». Врач сопоставляет предполагаемую инфекцию, вероятного возбудителя, место воспаления, тяжесть состояния и особенности конкретного человека. То бишь это не просто так - давайте выбере…
👍53❤26
Photo, posted without a caption
❤244🔥155👍38😍3🤣1
Лето закончилось, но впереди же новое лето) Всех с началом учебного года, пусть он будет простым и без нервов. Мамам 11-классников желаю сил, терпения и дзена. Все будет хорошо)
❤214🎉15😭5
Но лечение «на всякий случай» это реально плохо -не забываем про цену этого: диарея, тошнота, аллергические реакции, риск серьезных побочных эффектов и вклад в антибиотикорезистентность. При большинстве случаев острой боли в горле отказ от антибиотика редко приводит к осложнениям. ❗️Важно: ✅ Не начинайте антибиотик самостоятельно из домашней аптечки, по совету родственника или по старому рецепту. Неподходящий препа…
❤90👍24
Антибиотики при ангине: когда они действительно нужны? Постоянно сталкиваюсь с двумя мифами в своей практике. Первый - что при ангине всегда нужен антибиотик. Второй - что любая боль в горле или налеты - это ангина. На самом деле боль в горле, высокая температура и налет на миндалинах не всегда повод начинать антибиотик. Большинство острых болей в горле связано с вирусами, проходит примерно за неделю и не требует а…
❤64👍27
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @sovetdaymotiv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doctor_marusenyka” (@sovetdaymotiv), 23,895 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sovetdaymotiv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.