File, posted without a caption
🔥5

Channel
@broncho_doc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,595subscribers
+34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002016380429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @broncho_doc |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/broncho_doc |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 3,595 | +6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 3,589 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 3,584 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 3,582 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 3,573 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,571 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 3,572 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 3,570 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 3,566 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 3,563 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 3,561 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 3,560 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 3,561 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
265 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 98 | 37.0% | |
| ❤ | 93 | 35.1% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 13.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 9.81% | |
| ✍ | 10 | 3.77% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.377% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
File, posted without a caption
🔥5
📚 Сочетание рака и туберкулёза легкого на настоящий момент активно изучается в лабораториях нашего института. Наши сотрудники написали интереснейшую статью по молекулярным механизмам сочетания данных заболеваний 👇
❤9
🫁🦞🦠 Рак и туберкулёз лёгких - что общего у этих двух казалось бы совершенно разных заболеваний? 🩻🫁 Кроме того, что на компьютерной томографии некоторые формы этих заболеваний могут быть похожи друг на друга, а также и при бронхоскопии центральный рак и туберкулез бронхов иногда сложно дифференцировать, может встречаться и СОЧЕТАНИЕ этих заболеваний! ☝️ 📚 Из научной литературы известно, что туберкулез повышает риск …
❤13👍6🔥1
👊🦞 🫁 Сегодня Всемирный день борьбы с одним из главных врагов бронхолога - раком легкого! 🩻🫁 Сложно переоценить роль бронхоскопии в диагностике и лечении этого заболевания. Но не забываем, что основным методом скрининга является низкодозная компьютерная томография у пациентов из групп риска (в первую очередь курильщиков !🚭) 🫁 Самое время вспомнить базу про рак легкого с точки зрения эндоскописта ⏬ https://t.me/bron…
❤14👍6🔥2
#НеделяБронхоскопии Редкие заболевания трахеи и бронхов на пяти клинических случаях — от остеохондропластической трахеобронхопатии и трахеобронхиального амилоидоза до лёгочного альвеолярного протеиноза и метастатического лёгочного кальциноза. Часть пациентов годами наблюдалась с неверными диагнозами (туберкулёз, пневмофиброз, саркоидоз), пока бронхоскопия с конфокальной лазерной эндомикроскопией и биопсией не расста…
🔥16❤4👍4
Грядет 1 августа — Всемирный день борьбы с раком лёгких 🫁 Всю эту неделю посвящаем теме бронхоскопии - одному из ключевых методов ранней диагностики рака лёгких. Вас ждут наши постоянные рубрики #смотрим_с_АВЭ и #читаем_с_АВЭ Ранняя диагностика спасает жизни — делитесь публикациями с коллегами. #НеделяБронхоскопии Rusendo-Бот | Сайт | Тезисы | Vk-Видео
❤8🔥4
🫁 Ваш broncho_doc в отпуске! Набираюсь сил и эмоций для создания нового контента! Всем отличного лета и отпусков! Увидимся в августе 😉
❤🔥26👍17❤8🔥8😘1
📖 И вот хорошая статья на эту тему из NEJM 👇 https://t.me/broncho_doc/1743
❤10🔥2
🫁 🩻 Пост про сравнение двух методик биопсии периферических новообразований был выше ⬆️ https://t.me/broncho_doc/1443
❤5🔥3
🗣️ До сих пор встречаюсь на конференциях с мнением торакальных хирургов: "Зачем все эти ваши навигационные трансбронхиальные биопсии, когда можно быстро и информативно сделать трансторакальную биопсию!" 🩺 Однако живые примеры показывают нам немного другую картину: 🩻 Пациент 67 лет наблюдался по поводу инфильтрата в нижней доле левого легкого, проведена антибактериальная терапия без эффекта, направлен в ПТД, данных …
🔥15❤6👍1
broncho_doc pinned a photo
⚪️👍 Преимущества транспищеводного доступа к патологии средостения с помощью ультразвукового бронхоскопа по сравнению с трансбронхиальным: - можно использовать при выраженной компрессии дыхательных путей у пациента или при небольшом размере дыхательных путей, в частности у детей (по данным литературы стандартный ультразвуковой бронхоскоп через трахею можно безопасно использовать у детей старше 12 лет и больше 50 кг, …
❤13🔥7✍6👍1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @broncho_doc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“broncho_doc” (@broncho_doc), 3,595 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/broncho_doc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.