Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ruslan_cardio

Channel

Ruslan_cardio

@studywithcardio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,712subscribers

+79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001408946993
TypeChannel
Username@studywithcardio
Created14 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/studywithcardio

Growth

14,61714,71214,664.56 August 2026 — 14,633 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,632 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,630 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,629 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,628 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,627 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,624 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,627 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,628 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,626 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,624 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,622 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,618 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,617 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,619 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,623 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,619 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,633 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,647 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,655 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,657 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,655 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,656 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,654 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,661 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,688 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,712 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 31 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,603–14,726 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 02:4014,712+24
3 Sept 2026, 19:0114,688+27
2 Sept 2026, 08:2914,661+7
1 Sept 2026, 08:1414,654-2
31 Aug 2026, 06:4414,656+1
30 Aug 2026, 04:5614,655-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:3614,657+2
28 Aug 2026, 03:3514,655+8
26 Aug 2026, 03:5414,647+14
25 Aug 2026, 02:2214,633+14
23 Aug 2026, 14:4714,619-4
22 Aug 2026, 03:3414,623+4
20 Aug 2026, 20:2514,619+2
19 Aug 2026, 17:0314,617-1
18 Aug 2026, 20:3314,618-4
17 Aug 2026, 20:2614,622-2
16 Aug 2026, 17:3714,624-2
14 Aug 2026, 23:5514,626-2
13 Aug 2026, 16:2714,628+1
12 Aug 2026, 19:1714,627first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 14,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held27 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total28,022
Reactions total614
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 26s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

860 reactions across 27 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
51960.3%
🔥20523.8%
😁11012.8%
🤓111.28%
🥰101.16%
💯50.581%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 860 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 27 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @studywithcardio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC588 views30 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

📌 Перевёл целиĸом на руссĸий - Пятое универсальное определение инфарĸта миоĸарда от ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF. 63 страницы, без соĸращений и пересĸаза. То, что ты учил про типы ИМ 1-5, официально устарело. Коротĸо: — типы 1-5 заменены на 3 ĸатегории: первичный ИМ, вторичный ИМ, ИМ связанный с процедурой + алгоритм ĸ ĸаждому — MINOCA переименован и переосмыслен — новые ĸритерии бессимптомного инфарĸта — усĸоренные алгоритмы

22🔥8

1 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTC994 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

❓Почему БПНПГ выглядит именно так? Показываю в видео 🔼 Базовые критерии полной БПНПГ: 🔹 QRS > 120 мс 🔹 RSR'-паттерн в V1-V3 (тот самый «М», формы могут отличаться) 🔹 широкий зубец S в V5-V6 и I отведении 🎁 👉 Ко дню знаний забирайте базовый гайд по чтению ЭКГ для новичков тут: @cardio_preparaty_bot (если у вас бот уже запущен, выберете в меню «список полезностей» и забирайте то, что вам нужно)

22

31 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,210 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😧 После восстановления ĸровотоĸа при инфарĸте ĸлетĸи миоĸарда иногда гибнут ещё аĸтивнее, чем во время самой ишемии. Каĸ это вообще возможно? Это реперфузионное повреждение - и в его основе лежат три механизма ĸлеточной гибели, ĸоторые часто путают между собой: апоптоз, неĸроптоз и повреждение свободными радиĸалами. Разница между ними не терминологичесĸая, а ĸлиничесĸая: от неё зависит, что происходит в зоне поврежд

18

29 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,570 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Новые рекомендации ESC 2026! 1. Сердечная недостаточность 2. 5 универсальное определение ИМ 3. ССЗ и ХБП 4. Реабилитация Ну что, делать от меня видеоразборы и полный перевод? Пишите в комментариях и я тогда сажусь прям сегодня) Вот вам ссылка на новые реки. https://disk.yandex.ru/d/Gdh2UR-3zOF71A

88🔥9

28 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,450 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Запоминайте и пересылайте коллеге, у которого плохо с английским.

🔥20😁2

27 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,590 views50 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

28🔥15🤓7

26 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,290 views57 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Изучаем ЭКГ на мониторе. Сохраняйте и накидайте сердечек, если любите анимации❤️

45🔥9🤓3

25 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,470 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❓️Сможете выбрать правильную тактику лечения? Пациент 68 лет с сахарным диабетом и заболеванием периферических артерий обратился с жалобами на усиливающуюся боль в правой стопе в течение 3 дней. Пациент сообщает, что боль изначально была слабой, но постепенно усилилась, несмотря на приём НПВС. Объективно: АД 95/60, пульс 118, частота дыхания 22, температура 38,9°С. При осмотре: второй и третий пальцы имеют серова

19🔥6

24 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,680 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Почему клетки сердца после инфаркта не восстанавливаются? Ответ не в в БАЗовой патофизиологии, которую многие проходят для галочки на 2–3 курсе и потом не вспоминают вплоть до ординатуры. А зря: без неё не понять зону некроза при ИМ. Сегодня вышла новая лекция «Патофизиология №1. Клеточная адаптация, клеточное повреждение, некроз». Разбираю: — чем гипертрофия отличается от гиперплазии и метаплазии — где проходит гр

28🔥10🥰3

21 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,780 views44 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Дигидрон-паук: давно не было дома 😁

😁27🔥17

20 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,950 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

⚡️ ВПВ + ФП — опасное сочетание Представьте: у пациента фибрилляция предсердий. Предсердия сокращаются с частотой около 600 в минуту. В норме АВ-узел работает как фильтр — он физически не способен провести все эти импульсы на желудочки и пропускает лишь часть, например каждый четвёртый. Но если у пациента есть синдром ВПВ, ситуация меняется. У него есть дополнительный путь проведения между предсердиями и желудочкам

19

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @studywithcardio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@studywithcardio edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 16:29 UTCAnonymous Poll143 voters

Какой диагноз наиболее вероятен?

  1. A) Интерстициальное заболевание лёгких8%
  2. B) Гиперчувствительный пневмонит1%
  3. C) Хроническая обструктивная болезнь лёгких85%
  4. D) Бронхоэктатическая болезнь2%
  5. E) Бронхиальная астма4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin · 44,662
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
SYNAPSE I СИНАПС
@synapse_channel1 · 40,050
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Reclin - live
@reclinlive · 30,121
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 137,258
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Медицинская Литература
@clinirec · 33,846
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ruslan_cardio” (@studywithcardio), 14,712 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studywithcardio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.